PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

European Union · Record · CO

CELEX 62018CO0392(01)

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 3 September 2020.#Mauro Bettani v European Commission.#Application for interpretation – Lack of legal representation – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-392/18 P-INT.

decidedEuropean Union· Court of Justice of the European Union· EN

Introduced

3 September 2020

Last action

Status

decided

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

3 September 2020

Records

Official record CELEX 62018CO0392(01) from European Union at Court of Justice of the European Union. Dated 3 September 2020. Status: decided.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

19 official files

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 3 September 2020.#Mauro Bettani v European Commission.#Application for interpretation – Lack of legal representation – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-392/18 P-INT.

View fileDownload file

  • Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 3 September 2020.#Mauro Bettani v European Commission.#Application for interpretation – Lack of legal representation – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-392/18 P-INT.

    judgment · EN · 3 September 2020

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Διάταξη του Δικαστηρίου (έκτο τμήμα) της 3ης Σεπτεμβρίου 2020.#Mauro Bettani κατά Ευρωπαϊκής Επιτροπής.#Αίτηση ερμηνείας – Μη εκπροσώπηση από δικηγόρο – Προδήλως απαράδεκτο.#Υπόθεση C-392/18 P-INT.

    judgment · EL · 3 September 2020

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Определение на Съда (шести състав) от 3 септември 2020 г.#Mauro Bettani срещу Европейска комисия.#Молба за тълкуване — Липса на представителство от адвокат — Явна недопустимост.#Дело C-392/18 P-INT.

    judgment · BG · 3 September 2020

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Rješenje Suda (šesto vijeće) od 3. rujna 2020.#Mauro Bettani protivEuropske komisije.#Zahtjev za tumačenje – Nepostojanje zastupanja odvjetnika – Očita nedopuštenost.#Predmet C-392/18 P-INT.

    judgment · HR · 3 September 2020

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Tiesas (sestā palāta) rīkojums, 2020. gada 3. septembris.#Mauro Bettani pret Eiropas Komisiju.#Lieta C-392/18 P-INT.

    judgment · LV · 3 September 2020

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Sklep Sodišča (šesti senat) z dne 3. septembra 2020.#Mauro Bettani proti Evropski komisiji.#Zadeva C-392/18 P-INT.

    judgment · SL · 3 September 2020

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Euroopa Kohtu määrus (kuues koda), 3.9.2020.#Mauro Bettani versus Euroopa Komisjon.#Kohtuotsuse tõlgendamistaotlus – Advokaadist esindaja puudumine – Ilmselge vastuvõetamatus.#Kohtuasi C-392/18 P-INT.

    judgment · ET · 3 September 2020

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Digriet tal-Qorti tal-Ġustizzja (Is-Sitt Awla) tat-3 ta’ Settembru 2020.#Mauro Bettani vs Il-Kummissjoni Ewropea.#Kawża C-392/18 P-INT.

    judgment · MT · 3 September 2020

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • 2020 m. rugsėjo 3 d. Teisingumo Teismo (šeštoji kolegija) nutartis.#Mauro Bettani prieš Europos Komisiją.#Byla C-392/18 P-INT.

    judgment · LT · 3 September 2020

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Ordonanța Curții (Camera a șasea) din 3 septembrie 2020.#Mauro Bettani împotriva Comisiei Europene.#Cauza C-392/18 P-INT.

    judgment · RO · 3 September 2020

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Unionin tuomioistuimen määräys (kuudes jaosto) 3.9.2020.#Mauro Bettani vastaan Euroopan komissio.#Tulkintapyyntö – Edustajana ei käytetä asianajajaa – Tutkittavaksi ottamisen edellytysten selvä puuttuminen.#Asia C-392/18 P-INT.

    judgment · FI · 3 September 2020

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Domstolens kendelse (Sjette Afdeling) af 3. september 2020.#Mauro Bettani mod Europa-Kommissionen.#Sag C-392/18 P-INT.

    judgment · DA · 3 September 2020

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Usnesení Soudního dvora (šestého senátu) ze dne 3. září 2020.#Mauro Bettani v. Evropská komise.#Žádost o výklad – Nezastoupení advokátem – Zjevná nepřípustnost.#Věc C-392/18 P-INT.

    judgment · CS · 3 September 2020

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Uznesenie Súdneho dvora (šiesta komora) z 3. septembra 2020.#Mauro Bettani proti Európskej komisii.#Návrh na výklad – Nedostatok zastúpenia advokátom – Zjavná neprípustnosť.#Vec C-392/18 P-INT.

    judgment · SK · 3 September 2020

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Despacho do Tribunal de Justiça (Sexta Secção) de 3 de setembro de 2020.#Mauro Bettani contra Comissão Europeia.#Pedido de interpretação — Falta de representação por advogado — Inadmissibilidade manifesta.#Processo C-392/18 P-INT.

    judgment · PT · 3 September 2020

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Domstolens beslut (sjätte avdelningen) av den 3 september 2020.#Mauro Bettani mot Europeiska kommissionen.#Mål C-392/18 P-INT.

    judgment · SV · 3 September 2020

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Beschikking van het Hof (Zesde kamer) van 3 september 2020.#Mauro Bettani tegen Europese Commissie.#Verzoek tot interpretatie – Geen vertegenwoordiging door een advocaat – Kennelijke niet-ontvankelijkheid.#Zaak C-392/18 P-INT.

    judgment · NL · 3 September 2020

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Ordinanza della Corte (Sesta Sezione) del 3 settembre 2020.#Domanda di interpretazione – Mancata rappresentanza da parte di un avvocato – Irricevibilità manifesta.#Causa C-392/18 P-INT.

    judgment · IT · 3 September 2020

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Ordonnance de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 3 septembre 2020.#Mauro Bettani contre Commission européenne.#Demande en interprétation – Absence de représentation par un avocat – Irrecevabilité manifeste.#Affaire C-392/18 P-INT.

    judgment · FR · 3 September 2020

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.