European Union · Record · CO
CELEX 62018CO0392(01)_INF
Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 3 September 2020.#Mauro Bettani v European Commission.#Application for interpretation – Lack of legal representation – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-392/18 P-INT.
Introduced
3 September 2020
Last action
—
Status
decided
Sponsors
—
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
3 September 2020
Records
Official record CELEX 62018CO0392(01)_INF from European Union at Court of Justice of the European Union. Dated 3 September 2020. Status: decided.
Timeline
No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
19 official files
Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 3 September 2020.#Mauro Bettani v European Commission.#Application for interpretation – Lack of legal representation – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-392/18 P-INT.
Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 3 September 2020.#Mauro Bettani v European Commission.#Application for interpretation – Lack of legal representation – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-392/18 P-INT.
judgment · EN · 3 September 2020
Ordinanza della Corte (Sesta Sezione) del 3 settembre 2020.#Domanda di interpretazione – Mancata rappresentanza da parte di un avvocato – Irricevibilità manifesta.#Causa C-392/18 P-INT.
judgment · IT · 3 September 2020
Euroopa Kohtu määrus (kuues koda), 3.9.2020.#Mauro Bettani versus Euroopa Komisjon.#Kohtuotsuse tõlgendamistaotlus – Advokaadist esindaja puudumine – Ilmselge vastuvõetamatus.#Kohtuasi C-392/18 P-INT.
judgment · ET · 3 September 2020
Rješenje Suda (šesto vijeće) od 3. rujna 2020.#Mauro Bettani protivEuropske komisije.#Zahtjev za tumačenje – Nepostojanje zastupanja odvjetnika – Očita nedopuštenost.#Predmet C-392/18 P-INT.
judgment · HR · 3 September 2020
Domstolens kendelse (Sjette Afdeling) af 3. september 2020.#Mauro Bettani mod Europa-Kommissionen.#Anmodning om fortolkning – manglende repræsentation ved en advokat – åbenbart afvisningsgrundlag.#Sag C-392/18 P-INT.
judgment · DA · 3 September 2020
Определение на Съда (шести състав) от 3 септември 2020 г.#Молба за тълкуване — Липса на представителство от адвокат — Явна недопустимост.#Дело C-392/18 P-INT.
judgment · BG · 3 September 2020
Postanowienie Trybunału (szósta izba) z dnia 3 września 2020 r.#Mauro Bettani przeciwko Komisji Europejskiej.#Wniosek o wykładnię – Brak reprezentowania przez adwokata – Oczywista niedopuszczalność.#Sprawa C-392/18 P-INT.
judgment · PL · 3 September 2020
Domstolens beslut (sjätte avdelningen) av den 3 september 2020.#Mauro Bettani mot Europeiska kommissionen.#Ansökan om tolkning – Parten företräds inte av en advokat – Uppenbart att talan ska avvisas.#Mål C-392/18 P-INT.
judgment · SV · 3 September 2020
Ordonanța Curții (Camera a șasea) din 3 septembrie 2020.#Mauro Bettani împotriva Comisiei Europene.#Cerere de interpretare – Lipsa reprezentării prin avocat – Inadmisibilitate vădită.#Cauza C-392/18 P-INT.
judgment · RO · 3 September 2020
Digriet tal-Qorti tal-Ġustizzja (Is-Sitt Awla) tat-3 ta’ Settembru 2020.#Mauro Bettani vs Il-Kummissjoni Ewropea.#Talba għal interpretazzjoni – Assenza ta’ rappreżentazzjoni minn avukat – Inammissibbiltà manifesta.#Kawża C-392/18 P-INT.
judgment · MT · 3 September 2020
2020 m. rugsėjo 3 d. Teisingumo Teismo (šeštoji kolegija) nutartis.#Mauro Bettani prieš Europos Komisiją.#Prašymas išaiškinti – Atstovavimo pasitelkiant advokatą nebuvimas – Akivaizdus nepriimtinumas.#Byla C-392/18 P-INT.
judgment · LT · 3 September 2020
Tiesas (sestā palāta) rīkojums, 2020. gada 3. septembris.#Mauro Bettani pret Eiropas Komisiju.#Pieteikums interpretēt nolēmumu – Advokāta pārstāvības trūkums – Acīmredzama nepieņemamība.#Lieta C-392/18 P-INT.
judgment · LV · 3 September 2020
Ordonnance de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 3 septembre 2020.#Mauro Bettani contre Commission européenne.#Demande en interprétation – Absence de représentation par un avocat – Irrecevabilité manifeste.#Affaire C-392/18 P-INT.
judgment · FR · 3 September 2020
Sklep Sodišča (šesti senat) z dne 3. septembra 2020.#Mauro Bettani proti Evropski komisiji.#Zahteva za razlago – Neobstoj zastopanja po odvetniku – Očitna nedopustnost.#Zadeva C-392/18 P-INT.
judgment · SL · 3 September 2020
Despacho do Tribunal de Justiça (Sexta Secção) de 3 de setembro de 2020.#Mauro Bettani contra Comissão Europeia.#Pedido de interpretação — Falta de representação por advogado — Inadmissibilidade manifesta.#Processo C-392/18 P-INT.
judgment · PT · 3 September 2020
Uznesenie Súdneho dvora (šiesta komora) z 3. septembra 2020.#Návrh na výklad – Nedostatok zastúpenia advokátom – Zjavná neprípustnosť.#Vec C-392/18 P-INT.
judgment · SK · 3 September 2020
A Bíróság végzése (hatodik tanács), 2020. szeptember 3.#Értelmezés iránti kérelem – Az ügyvédi képviselet hiánya – Nyilvánvaló elfogadhatatlanság.#C-392/18 P-INT. sz. ügy.
judgment · HU · 3 September 2020
Beschikking van het Hof (Zesde kamer) van 3 september 2020.#Mauro Bettani tegen Europese Commissie.#Verzoek tot interpretatie – Geen vertegenwoordiging door een advocaat – Kennelijke niet-ontvankelijkheid.#Zaak C-392/18 P-INT.
judgment · NL · 3 September 2020
Usnesení Soudního dvora (šestého senátu) ze dne 3. září 2020.#Mauro Bettani v. Evropská komise.#Žádost o výklad – Nezastoupení advokátem – Zjevná nepřípustnost.#Věc C-392/18 P-INT.
judgment · CS · 3 September 2020
Sponsors
No sponsors or actors listed by the source.
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.