European Union · Record · CO
CELEX 62018CO0392
Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 7 March 2019.#Mauro Bettani v European Commission.#Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Article 19, third and fourth paras of the Statute of the European Court of Justice– Article 119(2) and (3), of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Applicant being a lawyer and acting by himself before the Court — Appeal manifestly inadmissible.#Case C-392/18 P.
Introduced
7 March 2019
Last action
7 March 2019 · Decided
Status
decided
Sponsors
—
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
7 March 2019
Records
Official record CELEX 62018CO0392 from European Union at Court of Justice of the European Union. Dated 7 March 2019. Status: decided.
Timeline
7 March 2019
Decided
Source: work_date_document
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
23 official files
Ordinanza della Corte (Sesta Sezione) del 7 marzo 2019.#Mauro Bettani contro Commissione europea.#Impugnazione – Articolo 181 del regolamento di procedura della Corte – Articolo 19, terzo e quarto comma, dello Statuto della Corte di giustizia dell’Unione europea – Articolo 119, paragrafi 2 e 3, del regolamento di procedura della Corte – Ricorrente in possesso della qualifica di avvocato e che agisce con tale qualifica dinanzi alla Corte – Impugnazione manifestamente irricevibile.#Causa C-392/18 P.
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Ordinanza della Corte (Sesta Sezione) del 7 marzo 2019.#Mauro Bettani contro Commissione europea.#Impugnazione – Articolo 181 del regolamento di procedura della Corte – Articolo 19, terzo e quarto comma, dello Statuto della Corte di giustizia dell’Unione europea – Articolo 119, paragrafi 2 e 3, del regolamento di procedura della Corte – Ricorrente in possesso della qualifica di avvocato e che agisce con tale qualifica dinanzi alla Corte – Impugnazione manifestamente irricevibile.#Causa C-392/18 P.
judgment · IT · 7 March 2019
Ordonnance de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 7 mars 2019.#Mauro Bettani contre Commission européenne.#Pourvoi – Article 181 du règlement de procédure de la Cour ‑ Article 19, troisième et quatrième alinéas, du statut de la Cour de justice de l’Union européenne – Article 119, paragraphes 2 et 3, du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Partie requérante ayant la qualité d’avocat et agissant par elle-même devant la Cour – Pourvoi manifestement irrecevable.#Affaire C-392/18 P.
judgment · FR · 7 March 2019
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Domstolens beslut (sjätte avdelningen) av den 7 mars 2019.#Mauro Bettani mot Europeiska kommissionen.#Överklagande – Artikel 181 i rättegångsreglerna – Artikel 19 andra och tredje styckena i stadgan för Europeiska unionens domstol – Artikel 119.2 och 119.3 i domstolens rättegångsregler – Sökanden är advokat och företräder sig själv vid domstolen – Uppenbart att överklagandet inte kan tas upp till prövning.#Mål C-392/18 P.
judgment · SV · 7 March 2019
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Sklep Sodišča (šesti senat) z dne 7. marca 2019.#Mauro Bettani proti Evropski komisiji.#Pritožba – Člen 181 Poslovnika Sodišča – Člen 19, tretji in četrti pododstavek, Statuta Sodišča Evropske unije – Člen 119(2) in (3) Poslovnika Sodišča – Tožeča stranka, ki je odvetnik in ki pred Sodiščem nastopa v svojem imenu – Očitno nedopustna pritožba.#Zadeva C-392/18 P.
judgment · SL · 7 March 2019
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Uznesenie Súdneho dvora (šiesta komora) zo 7. marca 2019.#Mauro Bettani proti Európskej komisii.#Odvolanie – Článok 181 Rokovacieho poriadku Súdneho dvora – Článok 19 tretí a štvrtý odsek Štatútu Súdneho dvora Európskej únie – Článok 119 ods. 2 a 3 Rokovacieho poriadku Súdneho dvora – Žalobca, ktorý má postavenie advokáta a ktorý sám vystupuje pred Súdnym dvorom – Zjavne neprípustné odvolanie.#Vec C-392/18 P.
judgment · SK · 7 March 2019
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Ordonanța Curții (Camera a șasea) din 7 martie 2019.#Mauro Bettani împotriva Comisiei Europene.#Recurs – Articolul 181 din Regulamentul de procedură al Curții – Articolul 19 al treilea și al patrulea paragraf din Statutul Curții de Justiție a Uniunii Europene – Articolul 119 alineatele (2) și (3) din Regulamentul de procedură al Curții – Reclamant având calitatea de avocat și care acționează în nume propriu în fața Curții – Recurs vădit inadmisibil.#Cauza C-392/18 P.
judgment · RO · 7 March 2019
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Despacho do Tribunal de Justiça (Sexta Secção) de 7 de março de 2019.#Mauro Bettani contra Comissão Europeia.#Recurso de decisão do Tribunal Geral — Artigo 181.° do Regulamento de Processo do Tribunal de Justiça — Artigo 19.°, terceiro e quarto parágrafos, do Estatuto do Tribunal de Justiça da União Europeia — Artigo 119.°, n.os 2 e 3, do Regulamento de Processo do Tribunal de Justiça — Recorrente que tem a qualidade de advogado e atua em representação própria — Recurso manifestamente inadmissível.#Processo C-392/18 P.
judgment · PT · 7 March 2019
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Postanowienie Trybunału (szósta izba) z dnia 7 marca 2019 r.#Mauro Bettani przeciwko Komisji Europejskiej.#Odwołanie – Artykuł 181 regulaminu postępowania przed Trybunałem – Artykuł 19 akapity trzeci i czwarty statutu Trybunału Sprawiedliwości Unii Europejskiej – Artykuł 119 § 2 i 3 regulaminu postępowania przed Trybunałem – Strona skarżąca posiadająca status adwokata i występująca sama przed Trybunałem – Odwołanie oczywiście niedopuszczalne.#Sprawa C-392/18 P.
judgment · PL · 7 March 2019
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Beschikking van het Hof (Zesde kamer) van 7 maart 2019.#Mauro Bettani tegen Europese Commissie.#Zaak C-392/18 P.
judgment · NL · 7 March 2019
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Digriet tal-Qorti tal-Ġustizzja (Is-Sitt Awla) tas-7 ta’ Marzu 2019.#Mauro Bettani vs Il-Kummissjoni Ewropea.#Appell – Artikolu 181 tar-Regoli tal-Proċedura tal-Qorti tal-Ġustizzja – It-tielet u r-raba’ paragrafu tal-Artikolu 19 tal-Istatut tal-Qorti tal-Ġustizzja tal-Unjoni Ewropea – Artikolu 119(2) u (3) tar-Regoli tal-Proċedura tal-Qorti tal-Ġustizzja – Rikorrent li għandu l-kwalità ta’ avukat u li jaġixxi huwa stess quddiem il-Qorti tal-Ġustizzja – Appell manifestament inammissibbli.#Kawża C-392/18 P.
judgment · MT · 7 March 2019
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Tiesas (sestā palāta) rīkojums, 2019. gada 7. marts.#Mauro Bettani pret Eiropas Komisiju.#Apelācija – Tiesas Reglamenta 181. pants – Eiropas Savienības Tiesas statūtu 19. panta trešā un ceturtā daļa – Tiesas Reglamenta 119. panta 2. un 3. punkts – Prasītājs, kurš ir advokāts un kurš pats sevi pārstāv Tiesā – Acīmredzami nepieņemama apelācijas sūdzība.#Lieta C-392/18 P.
judgment · LV · 7 March 2019
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
2019 m. kovo 7 d. Teisingumo Teismo (šeštoji kolegija) nutartis.#Mauro Bettani prieš Europos Komisiją.#Apeliacinis skundas – Teisingumo Teismo procedūros reglamento 181 straipsnis – Europos Sąjungos Teisingumo Teismo statuto 19 straipsnio trečia ir ketvirta pastraipos – Teisingumo Teismo procedūros reglamento 119 straipsnio 2 ir 3 dalys – Ieškovas, turintis advokato profesinį vardą ir atstovaujantis sau Teisingumo Teisme – Akivaizdžiai nepriimtinas apeliacinis skundas.#Byla C-392/18 P.
judgment · LT · 7 March 2019
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
A Bíróság végzése (hatodik tanács), 2019. március 7.#Mauro Bettani kontra Európai Bizottság.#Fellebbezés – A Bíróság eljárási szabályzatának 181. cikke – Az Európai Unió Bírósága alapokmánya 19. cikkének második és harmadik bekezdése – A Bíróság eljárási szabályzata 119. cikkének (2) és (3) bekezdése – Ügyvédi minőséggel rendelkező és a Bíróság előtti eljárásban önmagát képviselő felperes Nyilvánvalóan elfogadhatatlan fellebbezés.#C-392/18. P. sz. ügy.
judgment · HU · 7 March 2019
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Rješenje Suda (šesto vijeće) od 7. ožujka 2019.#Mauro Bettani protiv Europske komisije.#Žalba – Članak 181. Poslovnika Suda - Članak 19. treći i četvrti podstavak Statuta Suda Europske unije – Članak 119. stavci 2. i 3. Poslovnika Suda – Tužitelj koji je odvjetnik i samostalno djeluje pred Sudom – Očito nedopuštena žalba.#Predmet C-392/18 P.
judgment · HR · 7 March 2019
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Unionin tuomioistuimen määräys (kuudes jaosto) 7.3.2019.#Mauro Bettani vastaan Euroopan komissio.#Muutoksenhaku – Unionin tuomioistuimen työjärjestyksen 181 artikla – Euroopan unionin tuomioistuimen perussäännön 19 artiklan kolmas ja neljäs kohta – Unionin tuomioistuimen työjärjestyksen 119 artiklan 2 ja 3 kohta – Kantaja, joka on asianajaja ja joka toimii itse unionin tuomioistuimessa – Valitus, jonka tutkittavaksi ottamisen edellytykset selvästi puuttuvat.#Asia C-392/18 P.
judgment · FI · 7 March 2019
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Euroopa Kohtu määrus (kuues koda), 7.3.2019.#Mauro Bettani versus Euroopa Komisjon.#Apellatsioonkaebus – Euroopa Kohtu kodukorra artikkel 181 – Euroopa Kohtu põhikirja artikli 19 kolmas ja neljas lõik – Euroopa Kohtu kodukorra artikli 119 lõiked 2 ja 3 – Hageja, kes on advokaat ja kes end Euroopa Kohtus ise esindab – Ilmselgelt vastuvõetamatu apellatsioonkaebus.#Kohtuasi C-392/18 P.
judgment · ET · 7 March 2019
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Auto del Tribunal de Justicia (Sala Sexta) de 7 de marzo de 2019.#Mauro Bettani contra Comisión Europea.#Recurso de casación — Artículo 181 del Reglamento de Procedimiento del Tribunal de Justicia — Artículo 19, párrafos tercero y cuarto, del Estatuto del Tribunal de Justicia de la Unión Europea — Artículo 119, apartados 2 y 3, del Reglamento de Procedimiento del Tribunal de Justicia — Parte recurrente que tiene la condición de abogado y que actúa por sí misma ante el Tribunal de Justicia — Recurso de casación manifiestamente inadmisible.#Asunto C-392/18 P.
judgment · ES · 7 March 2019
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Διάταξη του Δικαστηρίου (έκτο τμήμα) της 7ης Μαρτίου 2019.#Mauro Bettani κατά Ευρωπαϊκής Επιτροπής.#Αίτηση αναιρέσεως – Άρθρο 181 του Κανονισμού Διαδικασίας του Δικαστηρίου – Άρθρο 19, τρίτο και τέταρτο εδάφιο, του Οργανισμού του Δικαστηρίου της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης – Άρθρο 119, παράγραφοι 2 και 3, του Κανονισμού Διαδικασίας του Δικαστηρίου – Αναιρεσείων που έχει την ιδιότητα του δικηγόρου και παρίσταται ο ίδιος ενώπιον του Δικαστηρίου – Αίτηση αναιρέσεως προδήλως απαράδεκτη.#Υπόθεση C-392/18 P.
judgment · EL · 7 March 2019
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Beschluss des Gerichtshofs (Sechste Kammer) vom 7. März 2019.#Mauro Bettani gegen Europäische Kommission.#Rechtsmittel – Art. 181 der Verfahrensordnung des Gerichtshofs – Art. 19 Abs. 3 und 4 der Satzung des Gerichtshofs der Europäischen Union – Art. 119 Abs. 2 und 3 der Verfahrensordnung des Gerichtshofs – Kläger, der Rechtsanwalt ist und sich im Verfahren vor dem Gerichtshof selbst vertritt – Offensichtlich unzulässiges Rechtsmittel.#Rechtssache C-392/18 P.
judgment · DE · 7 March 2019
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Domstolens kendelse (Sjette Afdeling) af 7. marts 2019.#Mauro Bettani mod Europa-Kommissionen.#Appel – artikel 181 i Domstolens procesreglement – artikel 19, tredje og fjerde afsnit, i statutten for Den Europæiske Unions Domstol – artikel 119, stk. 2 og 3, i Domstolens procesreglement – sagsøger, som er advokat og selvmøder for Domstolen – åbenbart, at appellen skal afvises.#Sag C-392/18 P.
judgment · DA · 7 March 2019
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Usnesení Soudního dvora (šestého senátu) ze dne 7. března 2019.#Mauro Bettani v. Evropská komise.#Kasační opravný prostředek – Článek 181 jednacího řádu Soudního dvora – Článek 19 třetí a čtvrtý pododstavec statutu Soudního dvora Evropské unie – Článek 119 odst. 2 a 3 jednacího řádu Soudního dvora – Navrhovatel, který má postavení advokáta a který sám vystupuje před Soudním dvorem – Zjevně nepřípustný kasační opravný prostředek.#Věc C-392/18 P.
judgment · CS · 7 March 2019
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Определение на Съда (шести състав) от 7 март 2019 г.#Mauro Bettani срещу Европейска комисия.#Обжалване — Член 181 от Процедурния правилник на Съда — Член 19, трета и четвърта алинея от Статута на Съда на Европейския съюз — Член 119, параграфи 2 и 3 от Процедурния правилник на Съда — Жалбоподател, който е адвокат и се представлява сам пред Съда — Явно недопустима жалба.#Дело C-392/18 P.
judgment · BG · 7 March 2019
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 7 March 2019.#Mauro Bettani v European Commission.#Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Article 19, third and fourth paras of the Statute of the European Court of Justice– Article 119(2) and (3), of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Applicant being a lawyer and acting by himself before the Court — Appeal manifestly inadmissible.#Case C-392/18 P.
judgment · EN · 7 March 2019
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Leesvertaling
Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.
Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.
Sponsors
- · CJ · Court of Justice of the European Union
- · efbe2eef-8e65-4b47-ba73-ac0f0541c9a4 · efbe2eef-8e65-4b47-ba73-ac0f0541c9a4
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.
- Official source: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:62018CO0392
- Open data entity: http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/c56f3202-4708-11e9-a8ed-01aa75ed71a1
- eurlex · 62018CO0392 · source updated 7 March 2019