European Union · Record · CO
CELEX 62018CO0577(01)
Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 2 April 2020.#Petrus Kerstens v European Commission.#Application for revision — Article 159 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Conditions — No evidence — No fact of such a nature as to be a decisive factor — Inadmissibility.#Case C-577/18 P-REV.
Introduced
2 April 2020
Last action
—
Status
decided
Sponsors
—
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
2 April 2020
Records
Official record CELEX 62018CO0577(01) from European Union at Court of Justice of the European Union. Dated 2 April 2020. Status: decided.
Timeline
No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
20 official files
Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 2 April 2020.#Petrus Kerstens v European Commission.#Application for revision — Article 159 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Conditions — No evidence — No fact of such a nature as to be a decisive factor — Inadmissibility.#Case C-577/18 P-REV.
Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 2 April 2020.#Petrus Kerstens v European Commission.#Application for revision — Article 159 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Conditions — No evidence — No fact of such a nature as to be a decisive factor — Inadmissibility.#Case C-577/18 P-REV.
judgment · EN · 2 April 2020
Beschikking van het Hof (Achtste kamer) van 2 april 2020.#Petrus Kerstens tegen Europese Commissie.#Verzoek tot herziening – Artikel 159 van het Reglement voor de procesvoering van het Hof – Voorwaarden – Geen bewijsmiddelen – Geen feit dat van beslissende invloed kan zijn – Niet-ontvankelijkheid.#Zaak C-577/18 P-REV.
judgment · NL · 2 April 2020
Unionin tuomioistuimen määräys (kahdeksas jaosto) 2.4.2020.#Petrus Kerstens vastaan Euroopan komissio.#Asia C-577/18 P-REV.
judgment · FI · 2 April 2020
Ordonnance de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 2 avril 2020.#Petrus Kerstens contre Commission européenne.#Demande en révision – Article 159 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Conditions – Absence de moyens de preuve – Absence d’un fait de nature à exercer une influence décisive – Irrecevabilité.#Affaire C-577/18 P-REV.
judgment · FR · 2 April 2020
Despacho do Tribunal de Justiça (Oitava Secção) de 2 de abril de 2020.#Petrus Kerstens contra Comissão Europeia.#Processo C-577/18 P-REV.
judgment · PT · 2 April 2020
Sklep Sodišča (osmi senat) z dne 2. aprila 2020.#Petrus Kerstens proti Evropski komisiji.#Zadeva C-577/18 P-REV.
judgment · SL · 2 April 2020
Ordonanța Curții (Camera a opta) din 2 aprilie 2020.#Petrus Kerstens împotriva Comisiei Europene.#Cauza C-577/18 P-REV.
judgment · RO · 2 April 2020
Tiesas (astotā palāta) rīkojums, 2020. gada 2. aprīlis.#Petrus Kerstens pret Eiropas Komisiju.#Lieta C-577/18 P-REV.
judgment · LV · 2 April 2020
2020 m. balandžio 2 d. Teisingumo Teismo (aštuntoji kolegija) nutartis.#Petrus Kerstens prieš Europos Komisiją.#Byla C-577/18 P-REV.
judgment · LT · 2 April 2020
Ordinanza della Corte (Ottava Sezione) del 2 aprile 2020.#Petrus Kerstens contro Commissione europea.#Causa C-577/18 P-REV.
judgment · IT · 2 April 2020
Domstolens kendelse (Ottende Afdeling) af 2. april 2020.#Petrus Kerstens mod Europa-Kommissionen.#Sag C-577/18 P-REV.
judgment · DA · 2 April 2020
Rješenje Suda (osmo vijeće) od 2. travnja 2020.#Petrus Kerstens protiv Europske komisije.#Prijedlog za ponavljanje postupka – Članak 159. Poslovnika Suda – Pretpostavke – Nepostojanje dokaza – Nepostojanje činjenice koja ima odlučujući utjecaj – Nedopuštenost.#Predmet C-577/18 P-REV.
judgment · HR · 2 April 2020
Uznesenie Súdneho dvora (ôsma komora) z 2. apríla 2020.#Petrus Kerstens proti Európskej komisii.#Návrh na obnovu konania – Článok 159 Rokovacieho poriadku Súdneho dvora – Podmienky – Neexistencia dôkazov – Neexistencia skutočnosti, ktorá môže mať rozhodujúci vplyv – Neprípustnosť.#Vec C-577/18 P-REV.
judgment · SK · 2 April 2020
Euroopa Kohtu määrus (kaheksas koda), 2.4.2020.#Petrus Kerstens versus Euroopa Komisjon.#Teistmisavaldus – Euroopa Kohtu kodukorra artikkel 159 – Tingimused – Tõendite puudumine – Sellise asjaolu puudumine, millel on otsustav tähtsus – Vastuvõetamatus.#Kohtuasi C-577/18 P-REV.
judgment · ET · 2 April 2020
Domstolens beslut (åttonde avdelningen) av den 2 april 2020.#Petrus Kerstens mot Europeiska kommissionen.#Mål C-577/18 P-REV.
judgment · SV · 2 April 2020
Digriet tal-Qorti tal-Ġustizzja (It-Tmien Awla) tat-2 ta’ April 2020.#Petrus Kerstens vs Il-Kummissjoni Ewropea.#Kawża C-577/18 P-REV.
judgment · MT · 2 April 2020
Auto del Tribunal de Justicia (Sala Octava) de 2 de abril de 2020.#Petrus Kerstens contra Comisión Europea.#Demanda de revisión — Artículo 159 del Reglamento de Procedimiento del Tribunal de Justicia — Requisitos — Falta de medios de prueba — Falta de un hecho que pueda tener una influencia decisiva — Inadmisibilidad.#Asunto C-577/18 P-REV.
judgment · ES · 2 April 2020
Beschluss des Gerichtshofs (Achte Kammer) vom 2. April 2020.#Petrus Kerstens gegen Europäische Kommission.#Wiederaufnahmeantrag – Art. 159 der Verfahrensordnung des Gerichtshofs – Voraussetzungen – Keine Beweise – Keine Tatsache von entscheidender Bedeutung – Unzulässigkeit.#Rechtssache C-577/18 P-REV.
judgment · DE · 2 April 2020
Postanowienie Trybunału (ósma izba) z dnia 2 kwietnia 2020 r.#Petrus Kerstens przeciwko Komisji Europejskiej.#Skarga o wznowienie postępowania – Artykuł 159 regulaminu postępowania przed Trybunałem – Przesłanki – Brak środków dowodowych – Brak okoliczności mogącej mieć decydujący wpływ – Niedopuszczalność.#Sprawa C-577/18 P-REV.
judgment · PL · 2 April 2020
Определение на Съда (осми състав) от 2 април 2020 г.#Petrus Kerstens срещу Европейска комисия.#Молба за отмяна на влязъл в сила съдебен акт — Член 159 от Процедурния правилник на Съда — Условия — Липса на доказателства — Липса на обстоятелство с решаващо значение — Недопустимост.#Дело C-577/18 P-REV.
judgment · BG · 2 April 2020
Sponsors
No sponsors or actors listed by the source.
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.