PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

European Union · Record · CJ

CELEX 62019CJ0086

Judgment of the Court of Justice (Fourth Chamber) of 9 July 2020.#SL v Vueling Airlines SA.#Preliminary ruling procedure — Air transport — Montreal Convention — Article 17, paragraph 2 — Liability of the air carrier in respect of checked baggage — Proven loss of checked baggage — Right to compensation — Article 22, paragraph 2 — Limits of liability in the event of destruction, loss, damage or delay of luggage — Lack of information on lost luggage — Burden of proof — Procedural autonomy of the Member States — Principles of equivalence and effectiveness.#Case C-86/19.

decidedEuropean Union· Court of Justice of the European Union· ES

Introduced

9 July 2020

Last action

Status

decided

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

9 July 2020

Records

Official record CELEX 62019CJ0086 from European Union at Court of Justice of the European Union. Dated 9 July 2020. Status: decided.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

  • Sentencia del Tribunal de Justicia (Sala Cuarta) de 9 de julio de 2020.#SL contra Vueling Airlines SA.#Procedimiento prejudicial — Transporte aéreo — Convenio de Montreal — Artículo 17, apartado 2 — Responsabilidad del transportista aéreo en materia de equipaje facturado — Pérdida acreditada del equipaje facturado — Derecho a indemnización — Artículo 22, apartado 2 — Límites de responsabilidad en caso de destrucción, pérdida, avería o retraso del equipaje — Falta de información sobre el equipaje perdido — Carga de la prueba — Autonomía procesal de los Estados miembros — Principios de equivalencia y de efectividad.#Asunto C-86/19.

    judgment · ES · 9 July 2020

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.