European Union · Record · CJ
CELEX 62019CJ0363
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 10 September 2020.#Consumer Ombudsman v Mezina AB.#Request for a preliminary ruling - Food safety - Nutrition and health claims made on food - Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 - Articles 5 and 6 - Scientific evidence for claims - Generally accepted scientific documentation - Article 10.1 - Article 28.5 – Transitional provisions – Unfair business practices practiced by traders vis-à-vis consumers in the internal market - Directive 2005/29/EC - Article 3(4) - Relationship between the provisions of Directive 2005/29 and other Union provisions regulating specific aspects of unfair commercial practices.#Case C-363/19.
Introduced
10 September 2020
Last action
—
Status
decided
Sponsors
—
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
10 September 2020
Records
Official record CELEX 62019CJ0363 from European Union at Court of Justice of the European Union. Dated 10 September 2020. Status: decided.
Timeline
No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
1 official file
Domstolens dom (tionde avdelningen) av den 10 september 2020.#Konsumentombudsmannen mot Mezina AB.#Begäran om förhandsavgörande – Livsmedelssäkerhet – Näringspåståenden och hälsopåståenden om livsmedel – Förordning (EG) nr 1924/2006 – Artiklarna 5 och 6 – Vetenskapliga belägg för påståenden – Allmänt vedertagen vetenskaplig dokumentation – Artikel 10.1 – Artikel 28.5 – Övergångsbestämmelser – Otillbörliga affärsmetoder som tillämpas av näringsidkare gentemot konsumenter på den inre marknaden – Direktiv 2005/29/EG – Artikel 3.4 – Förhållandet mellan bestämmelserna i direktiv 2005/29 och andra unionsbestämmelser som reglerar specifika aspekter av otillbörliga affärsmetoder.#Mål C-363/19.
judgment · SV · 10 September 2020
Sponsors
No sponsors or actors listed by the source.
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.