PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

European Union · Record · CJ

CELEX 62019CJ0495_SUM

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 June 2020.#Kancelaria Medius SA v RN.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 93/13/EEC – Article 7(1) – Consumer credit – Review of whether the contractual terms are unfair – Failure of the consumer to appear at the hearing – Scope of the court’s powers and obligations.#Case C-495/19.

decidedEuropean Union· Court of Justice of the European Union· EN

Introduced

4 June 2020

Last action

Status

decided

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

4 June 2020

Records

Official record CELEX 62019CJ0495_SUM from European Union at Court of Justice of the European Union. Dated 4 June 2020. Status: decided.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

6 official files

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 June 2020.#Kancelaria Medius SA v RN.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 93/13/EEC – Article 7(1) – Consumer credit – Review of whether the contractual terms are unfair – Failure of the consumer to appear at the hearing – Scope of the court’s powers and obligations.#Case C-495/19.

View fileDownload file

  • Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 June 2020.#Kancelaria Medius SA v RN.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 93/13/EEC – Article 7(1) – Consumer credit – Review of whether the contractual terms are unfair – Failure of the consumer to appear at the hearing – Scope of the court’s powers and obligations.#Case C-495/19.

    judgment · EN · 4 June 2020

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Wyrok Trybunału (szósta izba) z dnia 4 czerwca 2020 r.#Kancelaria Medius SA przeciwko RN.#Odesłanie prejudycjalne – Ochrona konsumentów – Dyrektywa 93/13/EWG – Artykuł 7 ust. 1 – Kredyt konsumencki – Kontrola nieuczciwego charakteru warunków umownych – Brak stawiennictwa konsumenta – Zakres kognicji sądu.#Sprawa C-495/19.

    judgment · PL · 4 June 2020

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Arrêt de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 4 juin 2020.#Kancelaria Medius SA contre RN.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Protection des consommateurs – Directive 93/13/CEE – Article 7, paragraphe 1 – Crédit à la consommation – Contrôle du caractère abusif des clauses – Absence de comparution du consommateur – Étendue de l’office du juge.#Affaire C-495/19.

    judgment · FR · 4 June 2020

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Unionin tuomioistuimen tuomio (kuudes jaosto) 4.6.2020.#Kancelaria Medius SA vastaan RN.#Ennakkoratkaisupyyntö – Kuluttajansuoja – Direktiivi 93/13/ETY – 7 artiklan 1 kohta – Kulutusluotto – Sopimusehtojen kohtuuttomuuden valvonta – Kuluttaja ei ole saapunut vastaamaan asiassa – Tuomioistuimen viran puolesta suorittaman tutkinnan laajuus.#Asia C-495/19.

    judgment · FI · 4 June 2020

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Urteil des Gerichtshofs (Sechste Kammer) vom 4. Juni 2020.#Kancelaria Medius SA gegen RN.#Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung – Verbraucherschutz – Richtlinie 93/13/EWG – Art. 7 Abs. 1 – Verbraucherkredit – Kontrolle der Missbräuchlichkeit von Vertragsklauseln – Nichterscheinen des Verbrauchers – Umfang der von Amts wegen wahrzunehmenden richterlichen Befugnisse.#Rechtssache C-495/19.

    judgment · DE · 4 June 2020

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Rozsudek Soudního dvora (šestého senátu) ze dne 4. června 2020.#Kancelaria Medius SA z siedzibą w Krakowie v. RN.#Řízení o předběžné otázce – Ochrana spotřebitele – Směrnice 93/13/EHS – Článek 7 odst. 1 – Spotřebitelský úvěr – Přezkum zneužívající povahy smluvních ujednání – Nedostavení se spotřebitele k soudnímu jednání – Rozsah povinnosti soudu rozhodnout i bez návrhu.#Věc C-495/19.

    judgment · CS · 4 June 2020

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.