European Union · Record · TJ
CELEX 62019TJ0185
Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 14 July 2021.#Public.Resource.Org, Inc. and Right to Know CLG v European Commission.#Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Harmonised standards – Documents concerning four harmonised standards approved by CEN – Refusal to grant access – Exception relating to the protection of the commercial interests of a third party – Protection deriving from copyright.#Case T-185/19.
Introduced
14 July 2021
Last action
—
Status
decided
Sponsors
—
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
14 July 2021
Records
Official record CELEX 62019TJ0185 from European Union at Court of Justice of the European Union. Dated 14 July 2021. Status: decided.
Timeline
No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
1 official file
Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 14 July 2021.#Public.Resource.Org, Inc. and Right to Know CLG v European Commission.#Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Harmonised standards – Documents concerning four harmonised standards approved by CEN – Refusal to grant access – Exception relating to the protection of the commercial interests of a third party – Protection deriving from copyright.#Case T-185/19.
Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 14 July 2021.#Public.Resource.Org, Inc. and Right to Know CLG v European Commission.#Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Harmonised standards – Documents concerning four harmonised standards approved by CEN – Refusal to grant access – Exception relating to the protection of the commercial interests of a third party – Protection deriving from copyright.#Case T-185/19.
judgment · EN · 14 July 2021
Sponsors
No sponsors or actors listed by the source.
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.