European Union · Record · CJ
CELEX 62020CJ0226
Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 24 February 2022.#Eurofer, Association Européenne de l'Acier, AISBL v European Commission.#Appeal – Dumping – Imports of hot-rolled flat products of iron, non-alloy or other alloy steel originating in Brazil, Iran, Russia, Serbia and Ukraine – Termination of the proceedings against imports originating in Serbia – Determination of injury – Cumulative assessment of the effects of imports from more than one third country – Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 – Article 3(4) – Termination of the proceedings without measures – Article 9(2) – ‘Negligible’ imports – De minimis threshold – European Commission’s discretion.#Case C-226/20 P.
Introduced
24 February 2022
Last action
—
Status
decided
Sponsors
—
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
24 February 2022
Records
Official record CELEX 62020CJ0226 from European Union at Court of Justice of the European Union. Dated 24 February 2022. Status: decided.
Timeline
No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
1 official file
Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 24 February 2022.#Eurofer, Association Européenne de l'Acier, AISBL v European Commission.#Appeal – Dumping – Imports of hot-rolled flat products of iron, non-alloy or other alloy steel originating in Brazil, Iran, Russia, Serbia and Ukraine – Termination of the proceedings against imports originating in Serbia – Determination of injury – Cumulative assessment of the effects of imports from more than one third country – Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 – Article 3(4) – Termination of the proceedings without measures – Article 9(2) – ‘Negligible’ imports – De minimis threshold – European Commission’s discretion.#Case C-226/20 P.
judgment · EN · 24 February 2022
Sponsors
No sponsors or actors listed by the source.
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.