Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 17 March 2022.#NP v Daimler AG, Mercedes-Benz Werk Berlin.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesarbeitsgericht Berlin-Brandenburg.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Directive 2008/104/EC – Temporary agency work – Article 1(1) – “Temporarily” assigned – Concept – Employment in a permanent job – Article 5(5) – Successive assignments – Article 10 – Sanctions – Article 11 – Derogation by the parties to a collective agreement from the maximum assignment period prescribed by the national legislature.#Case C-232/20.

decidedEuropean Union· Court of Justice of the European Union· EN

Introduced

17 March 2022

Last action

17 March 2022 · Decided

Status

decided

Records

Official record CELEX 62020CJ0232 from European Union at Court of Justice of the European Union. Dated 17 March 2022. Status: decided.

Timeline

17 March 2022
Decided
Source: work_date_document

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

23 official files

Domstolens dom (andra avdelningen) av den 17 mars 2022.#NP mot Daimler AG, Mercedes-Benz Werk Berlin.#Begäran om förhandsavgörande från Landesarbeitsgericht Berlin-Brandenburg.#Begäran om förhandsavgörande – Socialpolitik – Direktiv 2008/104/EG – Arbetstagare som hyrs ut av bemanningsföretag – Artikel 1.1 – Uthyrning för ’temporärt arbete’ – Begrepp – Innehav av en varaktig tjänst – Artikel 5.5 – På varandra följande uppdrag – Artikel 10 – Sanktioner – Artikel 11 – Arbetsmarknadens parter har avvikit från den längsta tidsperiod som föreskrivs i nationell lag.#Mål C-232/20.

View file Download file

Reading translation

Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

Translate to

On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

Domstolens dom (andra avdelningen) av den 17 mars 2022.#NP mot Daimler AG, Mercedes-Benz Werk Berlin.#Begäran om förhandsavgörande från Landesarbeitsgericht Berlin-Brandenburg.#Begäran om förhandsavgörande – Socialpolitik – Direktiv 2008/104/EG – Arbetstagare som hyrs ut av bemanningsföretag – Artikel 1.1 – Uthyrning för ’temporärt arbete’ – Begrepp – Innehav av en varaktig tjänst – Artikel 5.5 – På varandra följande uppdrag – Artikel 10 – Sanktioner – Artikel 11 – Arbetsmarknadens parter har avvikit från den längsta tidsperiod som föreskrivs i nationell lag.#Mål C-232/20.
judgment · SV · 17 March 2022
View Download Open at official source
Sentenza tal-Qorti tal-Ġustizzja (It-Tieni Awla) tas-17 ta’ Marzu 2022.#NP vs Daimler AG, Mercedes-Benz Werk Berlin.#Talba għal deċiżjoni preliminari, imressqa mil-Landesarbeitsgericht Berlin-Brandenburg.#Rinviju għal deċiżjoni preliminari – Politika soċjali – Direttiva 2008/104/KE – Xogħol temporanju – Artikolu 1(1) – Assenjazzjoni ‘b’mod temporanju’ – Kunċett – Okkupazzjoni ta’ pożizzjoni permanenti – Artikolu 5(5) – Assenjazzjonijiet suċċessivi – Artikolu 10 – Sanzjonijiet – Artikolu 11 – Deroga mill-imsieħba soċjali għall-perijodu massimu stabbilit mil-leġiżlatur nazzjonali.#Kawża C-232/20.
judgment · MT · 17 March 2022
View Download Open at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
Translate to
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Arrêt de la Cour (deuxième chambre) du 17 mars 2022.#NP contre Daimler AG, Mercedes-Benz Werk Berlin.#Demande de décision préjudicielle, introduite par le Landesarbeitsgericht Berlin-Brandenburg.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Politique sociale – Directive 2008/104/CE – Travail intérimaire – Article 1er, paragraphe 1 – Mise à disposition “de manière temporaire” – Notion – Occupation d’un poste existant durablement – Article 5, paragraphe 5 – Missions successives – Article 10 – Sanctions – Article 11 – Dérogation par les partenaires sociaux à la durée maximale fixée par le législateur national.#Affaire C-232/20.
judgment · FR · 17 March 2022
View Download Open at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
Translate to
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Urteil des Gerichtshofs (Zweite Kammer) vom 17. März 2022.#NP gegen Daimler AG, Mercedes-Benz Werk Berlin.#Vorabentscheidungsersuchen des Landesarbeitsgerichts Berlin-Brandenburg.#Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung – Sozialpolitik – Richtlinie 2008/104/EG – Leiharbeit – Art. 1 Abs. 1 – „Vorübergehende“ Überlassung – Begriff – Besetzung eines dauerhaften Arbeitsplatzes – Art. 5 Abs. 5 – Aufeinanderfolgende Überlassungen – Art. 10 – Sanktionen – Art. 11 – Abweichung von der vom nationalen Gesetzgeber festgelegten Höchstdauer durch die Sozialpartner.#Rechtssache C-232/20.
judgment · DE · 17 March 2022
View Download Open at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
Translate to
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Unionin tuomioistuimen tuomio (toinen jaosto) 17.3.2022.#NP vastaan Daimler AG, Mercedes-Benz Werk Berlin.#Landesarbeitsgericht Berlin-Brandenburgin esittämä ennakkoratkaisupyyntö.#Ennakkoratkaisupyyntö – Sosiaalipolitiikka – Direktiivi 2008/104/EY – Vuokratyö – 1 artiklan 1 kohta – Palvelukseen asettaminen ”tilapäisesti” – Käsite – Pysyvän tehtävän hoitaminen – 5 artiklan 5 kohta – Peräkkäiset toimeksiannot – 10 artikla – Seuraamukset – 11 artikla – Työmarkkinaosapuolet poikkeavat kansallisen lainsäätäjän vahvistamasta enimmäiskestosta.#Asia C-232/20.
judgment · FI · 17 March 2022
View Download Open at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
Translate to
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Presuda Suda (drugo vijeće) od 17. ožujka 2022.#NP protiv Daimler AG, Mercedes-Benz Werk Berlin.#Zahtjev za prethodnu odluku koji je uputio Landesarbeitsgericht Berlin-Brandenburg.#Zahtjev za prethodnu odluku – Socijalna politika – Direktiva 2008/104/EZ – Rad preko poduzeća za privremeno zapošljavanje – Članak 1. stavak 1. – Ustupanje ‚na određeno vrijeme’ – Pojam – Popunjavanje stalnog radnog mjesta – Članak 5. stavak 5. – Uzastopna ustupanja – Članak 10. – Kazne – Članak 11. – Odstupanje socijalnih partnera od maksimalnog trajanja koje je propisao nacionalni zakonodavac.#Predmet C-232/20.
judgment · HR · 17 March 2022
View Download Open at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
Translate to
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
2022 m. kovo 17 d. Teisingumo Teismo (antroji kolegija) sprendimas.#NP prieš Daimler AG, Mercedes-Benz Werk Berlin.#Landesarbeitsgericht Berlin-Brandenburg prašymas priimti prejudicinį sprendimą.#Prašymas priimti prejudicinį sprendimą – Socialinė politika – Direktyva 2008/104/EB – Darbas per laikinojo įdarbinimo įmones – 1 straipsnio 1 dalis – Paskyrimas „laikinai“ dirbti – Sąvoka – Darbas nuolatinėje darbo vietoje – 5 straipsnio 5 dalis – Vėlesni paskyrimai – 10 straipsnis – Sankcijos – 11 straipsnis – Socialinių partnerių sutarta kitokia nei nacionalinės teisės aktų leidėjo nustatyta maksimali trukmė.#Byla C-232/20.
judgment · LT · 17 March 2022
View Download Open at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
Translate to
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Wyrok Trybunału (druga izba) z dnia 17 marca 2022 r.#NP przeciwko Daimler AG, Mercedes-Benz Werk Berlin.#Wniosek o wydanie orzeczenia w trybie prejudycjalnym złożony przez Landesarbeitsgericht Berlin-Brandenburg.#Odesłanie prejudycjalne – Polityka społeczna – Dyrektywa 2008/104/WE – Praca tymczasowa – Artykuł 1 ust. 1 – Udostępnianie „tymczasowo” – Pojęcie – Zajmowanie stale istniejącego stanowiska – Artykuł 5 ust. 5 – Kolejne okresy skierowania – Artykuł 10 – Sankcje – Artykuł 11 – Odstąpienie przez partnerów społecznych od maksymalnego okresu ustalonego przez ustawodawcę krajowego.#Sprawa C-232/20.
judgment · PL · 17 March 2022
View Download Open at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
Translate to
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Sentenza della Corte (Seconda Sezione) del 17 marzo 2022.#NP contro Daimler AG, Mercedes-Benz Werk Berlin.#Domanda di pronuncia pregiudiziale proposta dal Landesarbeitsgericht Berlin-Brandenburg.#Rinvio pregiudiziale – Politica sociale – Direttiva 2008/104/CE – Lavoro tramite agenzia interinale – Articolo 1, paragrafo 1 – Assegnazione conferita “temporaneamente” – Nozione – Occupazione di un posto permanente – Articolo 5, paragrafo 5 – Missioni successive – Articolo 10 – Sanzioni – Articolo 11 – Deroga ad opera delle parti sociali alla durata massima stabilita dal legislatore nazionale.#Causa C-232/20.
judgment · IT · 17 March 2022
View Download Open at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
Translate to
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Arrest van het Hof (Tweede kamer) van 17 maart 2022.#NP tegen Daimler AG, Mercedes-Benz Werk Berlin.#Verzoek van het Landesarbeitsgericht Berlin-Brandenburg om een prejudiciële beslissing.#Prejudiciële verwijzing – Sociale politiek – Richtlijn 2008/104/EG – Uitzendarbeid – Artikel 1, lid 1 – ‚Tijdelijke’ terbeschikkingstelling – Begrip – Vervulling van een functie die permanent bestaat – Artikel 5, lid 5 – Achtereenvolgende opdrachten – Artikel 10 – Sancties – Artikel 11 – Afwijking door de sociale partners van de door de nationale wetgever vastgestelde maximumduur.#Zaak C-232/20.
judgment · NL · 17 March 2022
View Download Open at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
Translate to
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Hotărârea Curții (Camera a doua) din 17 martie 2022.#NP împotriva Daimler AG, Mercedes-Benz Werk Berlin.#Cerere de decizie preliminară formulată de Landesarbeitsgericht Berlin-Brandenburg.#Trimitere preliminară – Politica socială – Directiva 2008/104/CE – Munca prin agent de muncă temporară – Articolul 1 alineatul (1) – Punere la dispoziție «temporară» – Noțiune – Ocuparea unui loc de muncă disponibil permanent – Articolul 5 alineatul (5) – Misiuni de muncă temporară succesive – Articolul 10 – Sancțiuni – Articolul 11 – Derogare din partea partenerilor sociali de la durata maximă stabilită de legiuitorul național.#Cauza C-232/20.
judgment · RO · 17 March 2022
View Download Open at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
Translate to
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Acórdão do Tribunal de Justiça (Segunda Secção) de 17 de março de 2022.#NP contra Daimler AG, Mercedes-Benz Werk Berlin.#Pedido de decisão prejudicial apresentado pelo Landesarbeitsgericht Berlin-Brandenburg.#Reenvio prejudicial – Política social – Diretiva 2008/104/CE – Trabalho temporário – Artigo 1.°, n.° 1 – Cedência “temporária” – Conceito – Ocupação de modo duradouro de um lugar existente – Artigo 5.°, n.° 5 – Cedências sucessivas – Artigo 10.° – Sanções – Artigo 11.° – Derrogação pelos parceiros sociais da duração máxima fixada pelo legislador nacional.#Processo C-232/20.
judgment · PT · 17 March 2022
View Download Open at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
Translate to
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Tiesas spriedums (otrā palāta), 2022. gada 17. marts.#NP pret Daimler AG, Mercedes-Benz Werk Berlin.#Landesarbeitsgericht Berlin-Brandenburg lūgums sniegt prejudiciālu nolēmumu.#Lūgums sniegt prejudiciālu nolēmumu – Sociālā politika – Direktīva 2008/104/EK – Pagaidu darbs – 1. panta 1. punkts – Norīkošana “uz noteiktu laiku” – Jēdziens – Pastāvīgas amata vietas ieņemšana – 5. panta 5. punkts – Secīga norīkošana – 10. pants – Sodi – 11. pants – Sociālo partneru atkāpes no valsts likumdevēja noteiktā maksimālā ilguma.#Lieta C-232/20.
judgment · LV · 17 March 2022
View Download Open at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
Translate to
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Sentencia del Tribunal de Justicia (Sala Segunda) de 17 de marzo de 2022.#NP contra Daimler AG, Mercedes-Benz Werk Berlin.#Petición de decisión prejudicial planteada por el Landesarbeitsgericht Berlin-Brandenburg.#Procedimiento prejudicial — Política social — Directiva 2008/104/CE — Trabajo a través de empresas de trabajo temporal — Artículo 1, apartado 1 — Puesta a disposición “de manera temporal” — Concepto — Ocupación de un puesto que tenga carácter permanente — Artículo 5, apartado 5 — Cesiones sucesivas — Artículo 10 — Sanciones — Artículo 11 — Excepciones establecidas por los interlocutores sociales al período máximo previsto por el legislador nacional.#Asunto C-232/20.
judgment · ES · 17 March 2022
View Download Open at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
Translate to
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Απόφαση του Δικαστηρίου (δεύτερο τμήμα) της 17ης Μαρτίου 2022.#NP κατά Daimler AG, Mercedes-Benz Werk Berlin.#Αίτηση του Landesarbeitsgericht Berlin-Brandenburg για την έκδοση προδικαστικής αποφάσεως.#Προδικαστική παραπομπή – Κοινωνική πολιτική – Οδηγία 2008/104/ΕΚ – Εργασία μέσω εταιρίας προσωρινής απασχόλησης – Άρθρο 1, παράγραφος 1 – Τοποθέτηση εργαζομένου σε έμμεσο εργοδότη για να εργασθεί “προσωρινά” – Έννοια – Κάλυψη μόνιμης θέσης εργασίας – Άρθρο 5, παράγραφος 5 – Διαδοχικές τοποθετήσεις – Άρθρο 10 – Κυρώσεις – Άρθρο 11 – Συνομολογηθείσα από τους κοινωνικούς εταίρους παρέκκλιση από τη μέγιστη διάρκεια τοποθέτησης που καθόρισε ο εθνικός νομοθέτης.#Υπόθεση C-232/20.
judgment · EL · 17 March 2022
View Download Open at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
Translate to
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Domstolens dom (Anden Afdeling) af 17. marts 2022.#NP mod Daimler AG, Mercedes-Benz Werk Berlin.#Anmodning om præjudiciel afgørelse indgivet af Landesarbeitsgericht Berlin-Brandenburg.#Præjudiciel forelæggelse – socialpolitik – direktiv 2008/104/EF – vikararbejde – artikel 1, stk. 1 – »midlertidig« udsendelse – begreb – varig besættelse af en fast stilling – artikel 5, stk. 5 – successive udsendelser – artikel 10 – sanktioner – artikel 11 – arbejdsmarkedets parters fravigelse af den maksimale periode, der er fastsat af den nationale lovgiver.#Sag C-232/20.
judgment · DA · 17 March 2022
View Download Open at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
Translate to
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Rozsudek Soudního dvora (druhého senátu) ze dne 17. března 2022.#NP v. Daimler AG, Mercedes-Benz Werk Berlin.#Žádost o rozhodnutí o předběžné otázce podaná Landesarbeitsgericht Berlin-Brandenburg.#Řízení o předběžné otázce – Sociální politika – Směrnice 2008/104/ES – Agenturní zaměstnávání – Článek 1 odst. 1 – Přidělení ‚po přechodnou dobu‘ – Pojem – Zaměstnání na trvale existujícím pracovním místě – Článek 5 odst. 5 – Opakující se přidělení – Článek 10 – Sankce – Článek 11 – Odchylka učiněná sociálními partnery od maximální doby stanovené vnitrostátním zákonodárcem.#Věc C-232/20.
judgment · CS · 17 March 2022
View Download Open at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
Translate to
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Rozsudok Súdneho dvora (druhá komora) zo 17. marca 2022.#NP proti Daimler AG, Mercedes-Benz Werk Berlin.#Návrh na začatie prejudiciálneho konania, ktorý podal Landesarbeitsgericht Berlin-Brandenburg.#Návrh na začatie prejudiciálneho konania – Sociálna politika – Smernica 2008/104/ES – Dočasná agentúrna práca – Článok 1 ods. 1 – ‚Dočasné‘ pridelenie – Pojem – Obsadenie pracovného miesta, ktoré existuje trvale – Článok 5 ods. 5 – Nadväzujúce pridelenia – Článok 10 – Sankcie – Článok 11 – Odchýlenie sa sociálnych partnerov od maximálnej doby stanovenej vnútroštátnym zákonodarcom.#Vec C-232/20.
judgment · SK · 17 March 2022
View Download Open at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
Translate to
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
A Bíróság ítélete (második tanács), 2022. március 17.#NP kontra Daimler AG, Mercedes-Benz Werk Berlin.#A Landesarbeitsgericht Berlin-Brandenburg (Németország)által benyújtott előzetes döntéshozatal iránti kérelem.#Előzetes döntéshozatal – Szociálpolitika – 2008/104/EK irányelv – Munkaerő‑kölcsönzés – Az 1. cikk (1) bekezdése – »Ideiglenes« kikölcsönzés – Fogalom – Állandó jellegű munkakör betöltése – Az 5. cikk (5) bekezdése – Egymást követő kikölcsönzések – 10. cikk – Szankciók – 11. cikk – A szociális partnerek eltérése a nemzeti jogalkotó által megállapított maximális időtartamtól.#C-232/20. sz. ügy.
judgment · HU · 17 March 2022
View Download Open at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
Translate to
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Euroopa Kohtu otsus (teine koda), 17.3.2022.#NP versus Daimler AG, Mercedes-Benz Werk Berlin.#Eelotsusetaotlus, mille on esitanud Landesarbeitsgericht Berlin-Brandenburg.#Eelotsusetaotlus – Sotsiaalpoliitika – Direktiiv 2008/104/EÜ – Renditöö – Artikli 1 lõige 1 – Ajutiselt lähetamine – Mõiste – Olemasolevale ametikohale püsivalt asumine – Artikli 5 lõige 5 – Üksteisele järgnevad lähetused – Artikkel 10 – Karistused – Artikkel 11 – Tööturu osapoolte tehtav erand liikmesriigi seadusandja kehtestatud maksimaalsest kestusest.#Kohtuasi C-232/20.
judgment · ET · 17 March 2022
View Download Open at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
Translate to
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Sodba Sodišča (drugi senat) z dne 17. marca 2022.#NP proti Daimler AG, Mercedes-Benz Werk Berlin.#Predlog za sprejetje predhodne odločbe, ki ga je vložilo Landesarbeitsgericht Berlin-Brandenburg.#Predhodno odločanje – Socialna politika – Direktiva 2008/104/ES – Delo prek agencij za zagotavljanje začasnega dela – Člen 1(1) – ,Začasna‘ napotitev – Pojem – Zasedanje stalnega delovnega mesta – Člen 5(5) – Zaporedne napotitve – Člen 10 – Kazni – Člen 11 – Odstopanje socialnih partnerjev od maksimalnega trajanja, ki ga je določil nacionalni zakonodajalec.#Zadeva C-232/20.
judgment · SL · 17 March 2022
View Download Open at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
Translate to
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Решение на Съда (втори състав) от 17 март 2022 г.#NP срещу Daimler AG, Mercedes-Benz Werk Berlin.#Преюдициално запитване, отправено от Landesarbeitsgericht Berlin-Brandenburg.#Преюдициално запитване — Социална политика — Директива 2008/104/EО — Временна заетост — Член 1, параграф 1 — „Временно“ назначаване — Понятие — Заемане на трайно съществуваща длъжност — Член 5, параграф 5 — Последователни назначения — Член 10 — Санкции — Член 11 — Дерогация от страна на социалните партньори от максималната продължителност, определена от националния законодател.#Дело C-232/20.
judgment · BG · 17 March 2022
View Download Open at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
Translate to
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 17 March 2022.#NP v Daimler AG, Mercedes-Benz Werk Berlin.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesarbeitsgericht Berlin-Brandenburg.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Directive 2008/104/EC – Temporary agency work – Article 1(1) – “Temporarily” assigned – Concept – Employment in a permanent job – Article 5(5) – Successive assignments – Article 10 – Sanctions – Article 11 – Derogation by the parties to a collective agreement from the maximum assignment period prescribed by the national legislature.#Case C-232/20.
judgment · EN · 17 March 2022
View Download Open at official source
Leesvertaling
Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.
Vertaal naar
Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.

Official source: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:62020CJ0232
Open data entity: http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/e55104e3-a5d2-11ec-83e1-01aa75ed71a1
eurlex · 62020CJ0232 · source updated 17 March 2022