European Union · Record · TJ
CELEX 62021TJ0398
Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 2 April 2025.#Ryanair DAC and Ryanair Sun S.A. v European Commission.#State aid – Polish air transport market – Aid granted by Poland to LOT in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic – Subsidised loan and capital injection – Decision not to raise any objections – Article 107(3)(b) TFEU – Temporary Framework for State aid measures – Principle of non-discrimination – Freedom to provide services – Freedom of establishment – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-398/21.
Introduced
2 April 2025
Last action
—
Status
decided
Sponsors
—
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
2 April 2025
Records
Official record CELEX 62021TJ0398 from European Union at Court of Justice of the European Union. Dated 2 April 2025. Status: decided.
Timeline
No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
23 official files
Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 2 April 2025.#Ryanair DAC and Ryanair Sun S.A. v European Commission.#State aid – Polish air transport market – Aid granted by Poland to LOT in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic – Subsidised loan and capital injection – Decision not to raise any objections – Article 107(3)(b) TFEU – Temporary Framework for State aid measures – Principle of non-discrimination – Freedom to provide services – Freedom of establishment – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-398/21.
Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 2 April 2025.#Ryanair DAC and Ryanair Sun S.A. v European Commission.#State aid – Polish air transport market – Aid granted by Poland to LOT in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic – Subsidised loan and capital injection – Decision not to raise any objections – Article 107(3)(b) TFEU – Temporary Framework for State aid measures – Principle of non-discrimination – Freedom to provide services – Freedom of establishment – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-398/21.
judgment · EN · 2 April 2025
Tribunalens dom (sjunde avdelningen) av den 2 april 2025.#Ryanair DAC och Ryanair Sun S.A. mot Europeiska kommissionen.#Mål T-398/21.
judgment · SV · 2 April 2025
Sodba Splošnega sodišča (sedmi senat) z dne 2. aprila 2025.#Ryanair DAC in Ryanair Sun S.A. proti Evropski komisiji.#Zadeva T-398/21.
judgment · SL · 2 April 2025
Rozsudok Všeobecného súdu (siedma komora) z 2. apríla 2025.#Ryanair DAC a Ryanair Sun S.A. v. Európska komisia.#Vec T-398/21.
judgment · SK · 2 April 2025
Hotărârea Tribunalului (Camera a șaptea) din 2 aprilie 2025.#Ryanair DAC și Ryanair Sun S.A. împotriva Comisiei Europene.#Cauza T-398/21.
judgment · RO · 2 April 2025
Acórdão do Tribunal Geral (Sétima Secção) de 2 de abril de 2025.#Ryanair DAC e Ryanair Sun S.A. contra Comissão Europeia.#Processo T-398/21.
judgment · PT · 2 April 2025
Wyrok Sądu (siódma izba) z dnia 2 kwietnia 2025 r.#Ryanair DAC i Ryanair Sun S.A. przeciwko Komisji Europejskiej.#Sprawa T-398/21.
judgment · PL · 2 April 2025
Arrest van het Gerecht (Zevende kamer) van 2 april 2025.#Ryanair DAC en Ryanair Sun S.A. tegen Europese Commissie.#Zaak T-398/21.
judgment · NL · 2 April 2025
Sentenza tal-Qorti Ġenerali (Is-Seba’ Awla) tat-2 ta’ April 2025.#Ryanair DAC u Ryanair Sun S.A. vs Il-Kummissjoni Ewropea.#Kawża T-398/21.
judgment · MT · 2 April 2025
Vispārējās tiesas spriedums (septītā palāta), 2025. gada 2. aprīlis.#Ryanair DAC un Ryanair Sun S.A. pret Eiropas Komisiju.#Valsts atbalsts – Polijas gaisa transporta tirgus – Atbalsts, ko saistībā ar Covid 19 pandēmiju Polija piešķīrusi LOT – Subsidēts aizdevums un kapitāla iepludināšana – Lēmums necelt iebildumus – LESD 107. panta 3. punkta b) apakšpunkts – Pagaidu regulējums valsts atbalsta pasākumiem – Diskriminācijas aizlieguma princips – Pakalpojumu sniegšanas brīvība – Brīvība veikt uzņēmējdarbību – Pienākums norādīt pamatojumu.#Lieta T-398/21.
judgment · LV · 2 April 2025
2025 m. balandžio 2 d. Bendrojo Teismo (septintoji kolegija) sprendimas.#Ryanair DAC ir Ryanair Sun S.A. prieš Europos Komisiją.#Byla T-398/21.
judgment · LT · 2 April 2025
Sentenza del Tribunale (Settima Sezione) del 2 aprile 2025.#Ryanair DAC e Ryanair Sun S.A. contro Commissione europea.#Causa T-398/21.
judgment · IT · 2 April 2025
A Törvényszék ítélete (hetedik tanács), 2025. április 2.#Ryanair DAC és Ryanair Sun S.A. kontra Európai Bizottság.#T-398/21. sz. ügy.
judgment · HU · 2 April 2025
Presuda Općeg suda (sedmo vijeće) od 2. travnja 2025.#Ryanair DAC i Ryanair Sun S.A. protiv Europske komisije.#Predmet T-398/21.
judgment · HR · 2 April 2025
Unionin yleisen tuomioistuimen tuomio (seitsemäs jaosto) 2.4.2025.#Ryanair DAC ja Ryanair Sun S.A. vastaan Euroopan komissio.#Asia T-398/21.
judgment · FI · 2 April 2025
Üldkohtu otsus (seitsmes koda), 2.4.2025.#Ryanair DAC ja Ryanair Sun S.A. versus Euroopa Komisjon.#Kohtuasi T-398/21.
judgment · ET · 2 April 2025
Sentencia del Tribunal General (Sala Séptima) de 2 de abril de 2025.#Ryanair DAC y Ryanair Sun S.A. contra Comisión Europea.#Asunto T-398/21.
judgment · ES · 2 April 2025
Απόφαση του Γενικού Δικαστηρίου (έβδομο τμήμα) της 2ας Απριλίου 2025.#Ryanair DAC και Ryanair Sun S.A. κατά Ευρωπαϊκής Επιτροπής.#Υπόθεση T-398/21.
judgment · EL · 2 April 2025
Urteil des Gerichts (Siebte Kammer) vom 2. April 2025.#Ryanair DAC und Ryanair Sun S.A. gegen Europäische Kommission.#Rechtssache T-398/21.
judgment · DE · 2 April 2025
Rettens dom (Syvende Afdeling) af 2. april 2025.#Ryanair DAC og Ryanair Sun S.A. mod Europa-Kommissionen.#Sag T-398/21.
judgment · DA · 2 April 2025
Rozsudek Tribunálu (sedmého senátu) ze dne 2. dubna 2025.#Ryanair DAC a Ryanair Sun S.A. v. Evropská komise.#Věc T-398/21.
judgment · CS · 2 April 2025
Решение на Общия съд (седми състав) от 2 април 2025 г.#Ryanair DAC и Ryanair Sun S.A. срещу Европейска комисия.#Дело T-398/21.
judgment · BG · 2 April 2025
Arrêt du Tribunal (septième chambre) du 2 avril 2025.#Ryanair DAC et Ryanair Sun S.A. contre Commission européenne.#Aides d’État – Marché polonais du transport aérien – Aide accordée par la Pologne en faveur de LOT dans le cadre de la pandémie de COVID-19 – Prêt subventionné et injection de capital – Décision de ne pas soulever d’objections – Article 107, paragraphe 3, sous b), TFUE – Encadrement temporaire des mesures d’aide d’État – Principe de non-discrimination – Libre prestation de services – Liberté d’établissement – Obligation de motivation.#Affaire T-398/21.
judgment · FR · 2 April 2025
Sponsors
No sponsors or actors listed by the source.
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.