PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

European Union · Record · CJ

CELEX 62022CJ0049_SUM

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 8 June 2023.#Austrian Airlines AG v TW.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Article 5(1)(a) – Cancellation of a flight – Article 8(1) – Obligation to provide assistance – Concept of ‘re-routing’ – Compensation for air passengers in the event of cancellation of a flight – COVID‑19 pandemic – Repatriation flight organised by a Member State in the context of consular assistance – Flight operated by the same operating air carrier and at the same time as the cancelled flight – Costs to be borne by the passenger in excess of the net costs of that flight.#Case C-49/22.

decidedEuropean Union· Court of Justice of the European Union· EN

Introduced

8 June 2023

Last action

Status

decided

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

8 June 2023

Records

Official record CELEX 62022CJ0049_SUM from European Union at Court of Justice of the European Union. Dated 8 June 2023. Status: decided.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

3 official files

  • Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 8 June 2023.#Austrian Airlines AG v TW.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Article 5(1)(a) – Cancellation of a flight – Article 8(1) – Obligation to provide assistance – Concept of ‘re-routing’ – Compensation for air passengers in the event of cancellation of a flight – COVID‑19 pandemic – Repatriation flight organised by a Member State in the context of consular assistance – Flight operated by the same operating air carrier and at the same time as the cancelled flight – Costs to be borne by the passenger in excess of the net costs of that flight.#Case C-49/22.

    judgment · EN · 8 June 2023

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Urteil des Gerichtshofs (Dritte Kammer) vom 8. Juni 2023.#Austrian Airlines AG gegen TW.#Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung – Luftverkehr – Verordnung (EG) Nr. 261/2004 – Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. a – Annullierung eines Fluges – Art. 8 Abs. 1 – Beistandspflicht – Begriff ‚anderweitige Beförderung‘ – Ausgleichsleistungen für Fluggäste bei Annullierung von Flügen – Covid‑19-Pandemie – Repatriierungsflug, der von einem Mitgliedstaat im Rahmen der konsularischen Unterstützung organisiert wurde – Vom gleichen ausführenden Luftfahrtunternehmen zur gleichen Uhrzeit wie der annullierte Flug durchgeführter Flug – Dem Fluggast zur Last fallende Kosten, die die reinen Flugkosten übersteigen.#Rechtssache C-49/22.

    judgment · DE · 8 June 2023

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Arrêt de la Cour (troisième chambre) du 8 juin 2023.#Austrian Airlines AG contre TW.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Transports aériens – Règlement (CE) no 261/2004 – Article 5, paragraphe 1, sous a) – Annulation d’un vol – Article 8, paragraphe 1 – Obligation d’assistance – Notion de “réacheminement” – Indemnisation des passagers aériens en cas d’annulation d’un vol – Pandémie de Covid-19 – Vol de rapatriement organisé par un État membre dans le contexte d’une mission d’assistance consulaire – Vol effectué par le même transporteur aérien effectif et à la même heure que le vol annulé – Frais à la charge du passager excédant les coûts nets pour ce vol.#Affaire C-49/22.

    judgment · FR · 8 June 2023

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.