Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 11 January 2024.#Societatea Civilă Profesională de Avocaţi AB & CD v Consiliul Judeţean Suceava and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Aarhus Convention – Article 9(3) to (5) – Access to justice – Law firm partnership – Action seeking to challenge administrative measures – Admissibility – Conditions laid down by national law – No impairment of a right or undermining of a legitimate interest – Not prohibitively expensive judicial proceedings – Allocation of costs – Criteria.#Case C-252/22.

decidedEuropean Union· Court of Justice of the European Union· EN

Introduced

11 January 2024

Last action

11 January 2024 · Decided

Status

decided

Records

Official record CELEX 62022CJ0252_SUM from European Union at Court of Justice of the European Union. Dated 11 January 2024. Status: decided.

Timeline

11 January 2024
Decided
Source: work_date_document

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

23 official files

Wyrok Trybunału (czwarta izba) z dnia 11 stycznia 2024 r.#Societatea Civilă Profesională de Avocaţi AB & CD przeciwko Consiliul Judeţean Suceava i in.#Odesłanie prejudycjalne – Środowisko naturalne – Konwencja z Aarhus – Artykuł 9 ust. 3 – 5 – Dostęp do wymiaru sprawiedliwości – Adwokacka spółka partnerska – Skarga mająca na celu zakwestionowanie aktów administracyjnych – Dopuszczalność – Wymogi przewidziane w prawie krajowym – Brak naruszenia praw i uzasadnionych interesów – Niedyskryminacyjny ze względu na koszty charakter postępowań sądowych – Podział kosztów – Kryteria.#Sprawa C-252/22.

View file Download file

Reading translation

Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

Translate to

On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

Wyrok Trybunału (czwarta izba) z dnia 11 stycznia 2024 r.#Societatea Civilă Profesională de Avocaţi AB & CD przeciwko Consiliul Judeţean Suceava i in.#Odesłanie prejudycjalne – Środowisko naturalne – Konwencja z Aarhus – Artykuł 9 ust. 3 – 5 – Dostęp do wymiaru sprawiedliwości – Adwokacka spółka partnerska – Skarga mająca na celu zakwestionowanie aktów administracyjnych – Dopuszczalność – Wymogi przewidziane w prawie krajowym – Brak naruszenia praw i uzasadnionych interesów – Niedyskryminacyjny ze względu na koszty charakter postępowań sądowych – Podział kosztów – Kryteria.#Sprawa C-252/22.
judgment · PL · 11 January 2024
View Download Open at official source
Απόφαση του Δικαστηρίου (τέταρτο τμήμα) της 11ης Ιανουαρίου 2024.#Societatea Civilă Profesională de Avocaţi AB & CD κατά Consiliul Judeţean Suceava κ.λπ.#Προδικαστική παραπομπή – Περιβάλλον – Σύμβαση του Ώρχους – Άρθρο 9, παράγραφοι 3 έως 5 – Πρόσβαση στη δικαιοσύνη – Αστική επαγγελματική δικηγορική εταιρία – Ένδικη προσφυγή κατά διοικητικών πράξεων – Παραδεκτό – Προϋποθέσεις προβλεπόμενες από το εθνικό δίκαιο – Μη ύπαρξη προσβολής των δικαιωμάτων και των εννόμων συμφερόντων – Μη απαγορευτικό κόστος των ένδικων διαδικασιών – Κατανομή των δικαστικών εξόδων – Κριτήρια.#Υπόθεση C-252/22.
judgment · EL · 11 January 2024
View Download Open at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
Translate to
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Sodba Sodišča (četrti senat) z dne 11. januarja 2024.#Societatea Civilă Profesională de Avocaţi AB & CD proti Consiliul Judeţean Suceava in drugim.#Predhodno odločanje – Okolje – Aarhuška konvencija – Člen 9, od (3) do (5) – Dostop do pravnega varstva – Civilno poklicno združenje odvetnikov – Tožba za izpodbijanje upravnih aktov – Dopustnost – Pogoji, določeni v nacionalnem pravu – Neobstoj posega v pravice in legitimne interese – Ne pretirano dragi sodni postopki – Porazdelitev stroškov – Merila.#Zadeva C-252/22.
judgment · SL · 11 January 2024
View Download Open at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
Translate to
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Rozsudok Súdneho dvora (štvrtá komora) z 11. januára 2024.#Societatea Civilă Profesională de Avocaţi AB & CD proti Consiliul Judeţean Suceava a i.#Návrh na začatie prejudiciálneho konania – Životné prostredie – Aarhuský dohovor – Článok 9 ods. 3 až 5 – Prístup k spravodlivosti – Občianska profesijná spoločnosť advokátov – Žaloba smerujúca k napadnutiu správnych aktov – Prípustnosť – Podmienky stanovené vnútroštátnym právom – Neexistencia porušenia práv a legitímnych záujmov – Súdne konania, ktoré nie sú nedostupne drahé – Rozdelenie trov konania – Kritériá.#Vec C-252/22.
judgment · SK · 11 January 2024
View Download Open at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
Translate to
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Hotărârea Curții (Camera a patra) din 11 ianuarie 2024.#Societatea Civilă Profesională de Avocaţi AB & CD împotriva Consiliului Judeţean Suceava și alții.#Trimitere preliminară – Mediu – Convenția de la Aarhus – Articolul 9 alineatele (3)-(5) – Acces la justiție – Societate civilă profesională de avocați – Acțiune prin care se contestă acte administrative – Admisibilitate – Condiții prevăzute de dreptul național – Lipsa afectării drepturilor și a intereselor legitime – Proceduri jurisdicționale care nu sunt exagerat de costisitoare – Repartizare a cheltuielilor – Criterii.#Cauza C-252/22.
judgment · RO · 11 January 2024
View Download Open at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
Translate to
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Acórdão do Tribunal de Justiça (Quarta Secção) de 11 de janeiro de 2024.#Societatea Civilă Profesională de Avocaţi AB & CD contra Consiliul Judeţean Suceava e o.#Reenvio prejudicial — Ambiente — Convenção de Aarhus — Artigo 9.°, n.os 3 a 5 — Acesso à justiça — Sociedade civil profissional de advogados — Ação destinada a impugnar atos administrativos — Admissibilidade — Requisitos previstos pelo direito nacional — Inexistência de violação de direitos e de interesses legítimos — Custo não exageradamente dispendioso dos processos judiciais — Repartição das custas — Critérios.#Processo C-252/22.
judgment · PT · 11 January 2024
View Download Open at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
Translate to
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Arrest van het Hof (Vierde kamer) van 11 januari 2024.#Societatea Civilă Profesională de Avocaţi AB & CD tegen Consiliul Judeţean Suceava e.a.#Prejudiciële verwijzing – Milieu – Verdrag van Aarhus – Artikel 9, leden 3 tot en met 5 – Toegang tot de rechter – Maatschap van advocaten – Beroep waarin bestuurshandelingen worden betwist – Ontvankelijkheid – In het nationale recht gestelde voorwaarden – Geen schending van een recht of een rechtmatig belang – Niet onevenredig kostbare gerechtelijke procedures – Kostenverdeling – Criteria.#Zaak C-252/22.
judgment · NL · 11 January 2024
View Download Open at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
Translate to
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Sentenza tal-Qorti tal-Ġustizzja (Ir-Raba' Awla) tal-11 ta’ Jannar 2024.#Societatea Civilă Profesională de Avocaţi AB & CD vs Consiliul Judeţean Suceava et.#Rinviju għal deċiżjoni preliminari – Ambjent – Konvenzjoni ta’ Aarhus – Artikolu 9(3) sa (5) – Aċċess għall-ġustizzja – Soċjetà ċivili professjonali ta’ avukati – Rikors intiż li jikkontesta atti amministrattivi – Ammissibbiltà – Kundizzjonijiet previsti mid-dritt nazzjonali – Assenza ta’ ksur tad-drittijiet jew interessi leġittimi – Spejjeż mhux projbittivi tal-proċeduri ġudizzjarji – Tqassim tal-ispejjeż – Kriterji.#Kawża C-252/22.
judgment · MT · 11 January 2024
View Download Open at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
Translate to
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Tiesas spriedums (ceturtā palāta), 2024. gada 11. janvāris.#Societatea Civilă Profesională de Avocaţi AB & CD pret Consiliul Judeţean Suceava u.c.#Lūgums sniegt prejudiciālu nolēmumu – Vide – Orhūsas konvencija – 9. panta 3. – 5. punkts – Iespēja vērsties tiesā – Advokātu līgumsabiedrība – Prasība, ar kuru tiek apstrīdēti administratīvi akti – Pieņemamība – Valsts tiesībās paredzētie nosacījumi – Tiesību un leģitīmo interešu aizskāruma neesamība – Tiesvedība, kas nav pārmērīgi dārga – Tiesāšanās izdevumu sadale – Kritēriji.#Lieta C-252/22.
judgment · LV · 11 January 2024
View Download Open at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
Translate to
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
A Bíróság ítélete (negyedik tanács), 2024. január 11.#Societatea Civilă Profesională de Avocaţi AB & CD kontra Consiliul Judeţean Suceava és társai.#Előzetes döntéshozatal – Környezet – Aarhusi Egyezmény – A 9. cikk (3) – (5) bekezdése – Az igazságszolgáltatáshoz való jog biztosítása – Ügyvédi iroda – Közigazgatási aktusok vitatására irányuló kereset – Elfogadhatóság – A nemzeti jog által előírt feltételek – A jogok vagy jogos érdekek sérelmének hiánya – A bírósági eljárások nem megfizethetetlen költsége – A költségek megosztása – Szempontok.#C-252/22. sz. ügy.
judgment · HU · 11 January 2024
View Download Open at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
Translate to
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Presuda Suda (četvrto vijeće) od 11. siječnja 2024.#Societatea Civilă Profesională de Avocaţi AB & CD protiv Consiliul Judeţean Suceava i dr.#Zahtjev za prethodnu odluku – Okoliš – Arhuška konvencija – Članak 9. stavci 3. do 5. – Pristup pravosuđu – Strukovno građansko udruženje odvjetnika – Tužba kojom se pobijaju upravni akti – Dopuštenost – Zahtjevi utvrđeni nacionalnim pravom – Nepostojanje povrede prava i legitimnih interesa – Sudski postupci koji ne smiju biti preskupi – Podjela troškova – Mjerila.#Predmet C-252/22.
judgment · HR · 11 January 2024
View Download Open at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
Translate to
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Euroopa Kohtu otsus (neljas koda), 11.1.2024.#Societatea Civilă Profesională de Avocaţi AB & CD versus Consiliul Judeţean Suceava jt.#Eelotsusetaotlus – Keskkond – Århusi konventsioon – Artikli 9 lõiked 3 – 5 – Õigus kohtusse pöörduda – Tsiviilõiguslik advokaatide kutseühendus – Kaebused haldusaktide vaidlustamiseks – Vastuvõetavus – Liikmesriigi õiguses ette nähtud tingimused – Õiguste ja õigustatud huvide riive puudumine – Takistavalt kallid kohtukulud – Kohtukulude jaotus – Kriteeriumid.#Kohtuasi C-252/22.
judgment · ET · 11 January 2024
View Download Open at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
Translate to
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Sentencia del Tribunal de Justicia (Sala Cuarta) de 11 de enero de 2024.#Societatea Civilă Profesională de Avocaţi AB & CD contra Consiliul Judeţean Suceava y otros.#Procedimiento prejudicial — Medio ambiente — Convenio de Aarhus — Artículo 9, apartados 3 a 5 — Acceso a la justicia — Sociedad civil profesional de abogados — Recurso dirigido a impugnar actos administrativos — Admisibilidad — Requisitos establecidos por el Derecho nacional — Inexistencia de perjuicio para los derechos e intereses legítimos — Coste no prohibitivo de los procedimientos judiciales — Reparto de las costas — Criterios.#Asunto C-252/22.
judgment · ES · 11 January 2024
View Download Open at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
Translate to
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Domstolens dom (Fjerde Afdeling) af 11. januar 2024.#Societatea Civilă Profesională de Avocaţi AB & CD mod Consiliul Judeţean Suceava m.fl.#Præjudiciel forelæggelse – miljø – Århuskonventionen – artikel 9, stk. 3-5 – adgang til klage og domstolsprøvelse – advokatselskab – søgsmål til prøvelse af forvaltningsakter – antagelse til realitetsbehandling – betingelser fastsat i national ret – tilsidesættelse af rettigheder eller legitim interesse foreligger ikke – ikke uoverkommeligt dyre retslige procedurer – fordeling af sagsomkostninger – kriterier.#Sag C-252/22.
judgment · DA · 11 January 2024
View Download Open at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
Translate to
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Решение на Съда (четвърти състав) от 11 януари 2024 г.#Societatea Civilă Profesională de Avocaţi AB & CD срещу Consiliul Judeţean Suceava и др.#Преюдициално запитване — Околна среда — Орхуска конвенция — Член 9, параграфи 3 — 5 — Достъп до правосъдие — Адвокатско гражданско дружество — Жалба за оспорване на административни актове — Допустимост — Условия, предвидени в националното право — Липса на нарушение на права и законни интереси — Съдебни производства, които не са недостъпно скъпи — Разпределяне на съдебните разноски — Критерии.#Дело C-252/22.
judgment · BG · 11 January 2024
View Download Open at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
Translate to
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Unionin tuomioistuimen tuomio (neljäs jaosto) 11.1.2024.#Societatea Civilă Profesională de Avocaţi AB & CD vastaan Consiliul Judeţean Suceava ym.#Ennakkoratkaisupyyntö – Ympäristö – Århusin yleissopimus – 9 artiklan 3 – 5 kappale – Oikeus saada asia käsitellyksi tuomioistuimissa – Asianajajien ammattialan siviiliyhtiö – Kanne, jolla riitautetaan hallintotoimet – Tutkittavaksi ottaminen – Kansallisessa oikeudessa säädetyt vaatimukset – Oikeuksia ja oikeutettuja etuja ei ole loukattu – Tuomioistuinmenettelyt eivät saa olla niin kalliita, että se olisi esteenä menettelyyn osallistumiselle – Oikeudenkäyntikulujen jakaminen – Edellytykset.#Asia C-252/22.
judgment · FI · 11 January 2024
View Download Open at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
Translate to
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
2024 m. sausio 11 d. Teisingumo Teismo (ketvirtoji kolegija) sprendimas.#Societatea Civilă Profesională de Avocaţi AB & CD prieš Consiliul Judeţean Suceava ir kt.#Prašymas priimti prejudicinį sprendimą – Aplinka – Orhuso konvencija – 9 straipsnio 3 – 5 dalys – Teisė kreiptis į teismą – Advokatų profesinė bendrija – Teisinės gynybos priemonės administraciniams aktams užginčyti – Priimtinumas – Nacionalinėje teisėje numatytos sąlygos – Situacija, kai nepažeistos teisės ir teisėti interesai – Ne pernelyg brangus teismo procesas – Bylinėjimosi išlaidų paskirstymas – Kriterijai.#Byla C-252/22.
judgment · LT · 11 January 2024
View Download Open at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
Translate to
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Urteil des Gerichtshofs (Vierte Kammer) vom 11. Januar 2024.#Societatea Civilă Profesională de Avocaţi AB & CD gegen Consiliul Judeţean Suceava u. a.#Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung – Umwelt – Übereinkommen von Aarhus – Art. 9 Abs. 3 bis 5 – Zugang zu Gerichten – Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft bürgerlichen Rechts – Rechtsbehelf zur Anfechtung von Verwaltungshandlungen – Zulässigkeit – Voraussetzungen nach nationalem Recht – Keine Beeinträchtigung der Rechte und berechtigten Interessen – Nicht übermäßig teure Gerichtsverfahren – Kostenverteilung – Kriterien.#Rechtssache C-252/22.
judgment · DE · 11 January 2024
View Download Open at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
Translate to
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Sentenza della Corte (Quarta Sezione) dell'11 gennaio 2024.#Societatea Civilă Profesională de Avocaţi AB & CD contro Consiliul Judeţean Suceava e a.#Rinvio pregiudiziale - Ambiente - Convenzione di Aarhus - Articolo 9, paragrafi da 3 a 5 - Accesso alla giustizia - Società civile professionale di avvocati - Ricorso diretto a contestare atti amministrativi - Ricevibilità - Requisiti previsti dal diritto nazionale - Assenza di violazioni di diritti e di interessi legittimi - Non eccessiva onerosità dei procedimenti giurisdizionali - Ripartizione delle spese - Criteri.#Causa C-252/22.
judgment · IT · 11 January 2024
View Download Open at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
Translate to
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Rozsudek Soudního dvora (čtvrtého senátu) ze dne 11. ledna 2024.#Societatea Civilă Profesională de Avocaţi AB & CD v. Consiliul Judeţean Suceava a další.#Řízení o předběžné otázce – Životní prostředí – Aarhuská úmluva – Článek 9 odst. 3 až 5 – Přístup k právní ochraně – Profesní občanská společnost advokátů – Žaloby napadající správní akty – Přípustnost – Podmínky stanovené vnitrostátním právem – Absence porušení práv nebo legitimních zájmů – Náklady soudních řízení, které nejsou nepřiměřené – Rozdělení nákladů řízení – Kritéria.#Věc C-252/22.
judgment · CS · 11 January 2024
View Download Open at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
Translate to
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Domstolens dom (fjärde avdelningen) av den 11 januari 2024.#Societatea Civilă Profesională de Avocaţi AB & CD mot Consiliul Judeţean Suceava m.fl.#Begäran om förhandsavgörande – Miljö – Århuskonventionen – Artikel 9.3 – 9.5 – Tillgång till rättslig prövning – Advokatbyrå med delägarskap – Talan mot administrativa rättsakter – Upptagande till prövning – Villkor som föreskrivs i nationell rätt – Rättigheter eller berättigade intressen har inte kränkts – Kravet på att rättsliga förfaranden inte ska vara oöverkomligt kostsamma – Fördelningen av rättegångskostnaderna – Kriterier.#Mål C-252/22.
judgment · SV · 11 January 2024
View Download Open at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
Translate to
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Arrêt de la Cour (quatrième chambre) du 11 janvier 2024.#Societatea Civilă Profesională de Avocaţi AB & CD contre Consiliul Judeţean Suceava e.a.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Environnement – Convention d’Aarhus – Article 9, paragraphes 3 à 5 – Accès à la justice – Société civile professionnelle d’avocats – Recours visant à contester des actes administratifs – Recevabilité – Conditions prévues par le droit national – Absence d’atteinte aux droits et aux intérêts légitimes – Coût non prohibitif des procédures juridictionnelles – Répartition des dépens – Critères.#Affaire C-252/22.
judgment · FR · 11 January 2024
View Download Open at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
Translate to
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 11 January 2024.#Societatea Civilă Profesională de Avocaţi AB & CD v Consiliul Judeţean Suceava and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Aarhus Convention – Article 9(3) to (5) – Access to justice – Law firm partnership – Action seeking to challenge administrative measures – Admissibility – Conditions laid down by national law – No impairment of a right or undermining of a legitimate interest – Not prohibitively expensive judicial proceedings – Allocation of costs – Criteria.#Case C-252/22.
judgment · EN · 11 January 2024
View Download Open at official source
Leesvertaling
Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.
Vertaal naar
Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.

Official source: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:62022CJ0252_SUM
Open data entity: http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/dc90b80c-eea9-11ef-b5e9-01aa75ed71a1
eurlex · 62022CJ0252_SUM · source updated 11 January 2024