PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

European Union · Record · CO

CELEX 62022CO0074

Order of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 1 August 2022.#Soudal NV and Esko-Graphics BVBA v Magnetrol International NV and European Commission.#Appeal – Intervention – State aid – Aid scheme implemented by the Kingdom of Belgium – Admission of interventions in appeal proceedings against a judgment of the General Court – Annulment of the decision of the General Court – Referral of the case back to the General Court – Decision of the General Court refusing to place on the case file written observations on the judgment effecting that referral lodged by an intervener in the appeal – Implied decision of the General Court refusing to grant an intervener in the appeal the status of intervener before the General Court – Admissibility of the appeal – Status of intervener before the General Court of an intervener in the appeal – Appeal brought out of time – Excusable error.#Case C-74/22 P(I).

decidedEuropean Union· Court of Justice of the European Union· EN

Introduced

1 August 2022

Last action

Status

decided

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

1 August 2022

Records

Official record CELEX 62022CO0074 from European Union at Court of Justice of the European Union. Dated 1 August 2022. Status: decided.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

  • Order of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 1 August 2022.#Soudal NV and Esko-Graphics BVBA v Magnetrol International NV and European Commission.#Appeal – Intervention – State aid – Aid scheme implemented by the Kingdom of Belgium – Admission of interventions in appeal proceedings against a judgment of the General Court – Annulment of the decision of the General Court – Referral of the case back to the General Court – Decision of the General Court refusing to place on the case file written observations on the judgment effecting that referral lodged by an intervener in the appeal – Implied decision of the General Court refusing to grant an intervener in the appeal the status of intervener before the General Court – Admissibility of the appeal – Status of intervener before the General Court of an intervener in the appeal – Appeal brought out of time – Excusable error.#Case C-74/22 P(I).

    judgment · EN · 1 August 2022

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.