European Union · Record · CJ
CELEX 62023CJ0176
Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of May 30, 2024.#UG v. SC Raiffeisen Bank SA.#Preliminary referral – Directive 93/13/EEC – Abusive clauses in contracts concluded with consumers – Article 1 paragraph (2) – Scope – Exclusion of contractual clauses that reflect binding legal acts or administrative rules – Additional act to a credit agreement notified by the professional to the consumer in order to ensuring its compliance with a national regulation – Article 3 paragraph (2) – Contractual clause that was not individually negotiated – Non-signing of the additional act by the consumer – Presumption of tacit acceptance of this additional act – National jurisprudence that excludes jurisdictional control of the abusive character of a contractual clause contained in such an additional act. #Case C-176/23.
Introduced
30 May 2024
Last action
—
Status
decided
Sponsors
—
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
30 May 2024
Records
Official record CELEX 62023CJ0176 from European Union at Court of Justice of the European Union. Dated 30 May 2024. Status: decided.
Timeline
No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
1 official file
Hotărârea Curții (Camera a opta) din 30 mai 2024.#UG împotriva SC Raiffeisen Bank SA.#Trimitere preliminară – Directiva 93/13/CEE – Clauze abuzive în contractele încheiate cu consumatorii – Articolul 1 alineatul (2) – Domeniu de aplicare – Excluderea clauzelor contractuale care reflectă acte cu putere de lege sau norme administrative obligatorii – Act adițional la un contract de credit notificat de profesionist consumatorului în vederea asigurării conformității acestuia cu o reglementare națională – Articolul 3 alineatul (2) – Clauză contractuală care nu s‑a negociat individual – Nesemnarea actului adițional de către consumator – Prezumție de acceptare tacită a acestui act adițional – Jurisprudență națională care exclude controlul jurisdicțional al caracterului abuziv al unei clauze contractuale cuprinse într‑un asemenea act adițional.#Cauza C-176/23.
judgment · RO · 30 May 2024
Sponsors
No sponsors or actors listed by the source.
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.