PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

European Union · Record · CJ

CELEX 62023CJ0176

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of May 30, 2024.#UG v. SC Raiffeisen Bank SA.#Preliminary referral – Directive 93/13/EEC – Abusive clauses in contracts concluded with consumers – Article 1 paragraph (2) – Scope – Exclusion of contractual clauses that reflect binding legal acts or administrative rules – Additional act to a credit agreement notified by the professional to the consumer in order to ensuring its compliance with a national regulation – Article 3 paragraph (2) – Contractual clause that was not individually negotiated – Non-signing of the additional act by the consumer – Presumption of tacit acceptance of this additional act – National jurisprudence that excludes jurisdictional control of the abusive character of a contractual clause contained in such an additional act. #Case C-176/23.

decidedEuropean Union· Court of Justice of the European Union· RO

Introduced

30 May 2024

Last action

Status

decided

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

30 May 2024

Records

Official record CELEX 62023CJ0176 from European Union at Court of Justice of the European Union. Dated 30 May 2024. Status: decided.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

  • Hotărârea Curții (Camera a opta) din 30 mai 2024.#UG împotriva SC Raiffeisen Bank SA.#Trimitere preliminară – Directiva 93/13/CEE – Clauze abuzive în contractele încheiate cu consumatorii – Articolul 1 alineatul (2) – Domeniu de aplicare – Excluderea clauzelor contractuale care reflectă acte cu putere de lege sau norme administrative obligatorii – Act adițional la un contract de credit notificat de profesionist consumatorului în vederea asigurării conformității acestuia cu o reglementare națională – Articolul 3 alineatul (2) – Clauză contractuală care nu s‑a negociat individual – Nesemnarea actului adițional de către consumator – Prezumție de acceptare tacită a acestui act adițional – Jurisprudență națională care exclude controlul jurisdicțional al caracterului abuziv al unei clauze contractuale cuprinse într‑un asemenea act adițional.#Cauza C-176/23.

    judgment · RO · 30 May 2024

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.