European Union · Record · CO
CELEX 62023CO0274
Order of the Court (Appeal Admission Chamber) of 28 September 2023.#Romedor Pharma SRL v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).#Appeal – European Union trade mark – Admission of appeals – Article 170 ter of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – Request not demonstrating the importance of a question for the unity, coherence or development of Union law – Non‑admission of appeal.#Case C-274/23 P.
Introduced
28 September 2023
Last action
—
Status
decided
Sponsors
—
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
28 September 2023
Records
Official record CELEX 62023CO0274 from European Union at Court of Justice of the European Union. Dated 28 September 2023. Status: decided.
Timeline
No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
2 official files
Ordonanța Curții din 28 septembrie 2023.#Romedor Pharma SRL împotriva Oficiul Uniunii Europene pentru Proprietate Intelectuală.#Recurs – Marcă a Uniunii Europene – Admiterea în principiu a recursurilor – Articolul 170b din Regulamentul de procedură al Curții – Cerere care nu demonstrează importanța unei chestiuni pentru unitatea, coerența sau dezvoltarea dreptului Uniunii – Neadmitere în principiu a recursului.#Cauza C-274/23 P.
judgment · RO · 28 September 2023
Ordonnance de la Cour (chambre d'admission des pourvois) du 28 septembre 2023.#Romedor Pharma SRL contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle (EUIPO).#Pourvoi – Marque de l’Union européenne – Admission des pourvois – Article 170 ter du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Demande ne démontrant pas l’importance d’une question pour l’unité, la cohérence ou le développement du droit de l’Union – Non‑admission du pourvoi.#Affaire C-274/23 P.
judgment · FR · 28 September 2023
Sponsors
No sponsors or actors listed by the source.
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.