Judgment of the General Court (Intermediate Chamber) of 30 September 2026.#Állatorvostudományi Egyetem v Council of the European Union.#Implementation of the Union budget – Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2092 – General regime of conditionality for the protection of the Union budget – Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/2506 – Measures for the protection of the Union budget against breaches of the principles of the rule of law in Hungary – Article 2(2) of Implementing Decision 2022/2506 – Prohibition preventing the Commission from entering into legal commitments with any public interest trust or any entity maintained by such a trust – Article 4(1) of Regulation 2020/2092 – Obligation to state reasons – Legal certainty – Legitimate expectations – Rights of the defence – Intensity of judicial review – Proportionality – Right to operate on an undistorted market – Article 16 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Principle of equal treatment and non-discrimination – Plea of illegality.#Case T-133/23.

Official titles

Authentic titles published by the source. The stored canonical title is not replaced.

Records

Official record CELEX 62023TJ0133 from European Union at Court of Justice of the European Union. Dated 30 September 2026. Status: decided.

Timeline

1. 30 September 2026

   Decided

   Source: work_date_document

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

2 official files

• Arrêt du Tribunal (chambre intermédiaire) du 30 septembre 2026.#Állatorvostudományi Egyetem contre Conseil de l'Union européenne.#Exécution du budget de l’Union – Règlement (UE, Euratom) 2020/2092 – Régime général de conditionnalité pour la protection du budget de l’Union – Décision d’exécution (UE) 2022/2506 – Mesures de protection du budget de l’Union contre les violations des principes de l’État de droit en Hongrie – Article 2, paragraphe 2, de la décision d’exécution 2022/2506 – Interdiction pour la Commission de contracter des engagements juridiques avec une fiducie (trust) d’intérêt public ou avec une entité détenue par une telle fiducie (trust) – Article 4, paragraphe 1, du règlement 2020/2092 – Obligation de motivation – Sécurité juridique – Confiance légitime – Droits de la défense – Intensité du contrôle juridictionnel – Proportionnalité – Droit d’opérer sur un marché non faussé – Article 16 de la charte des droits fondamentaux – Principe d’égalité de traitement et de non-discrimination – Exception d’illégalité.#Affaire T-133/23.

  judgment · FR · 30 September 2026

  ViewDownloadOpen at official source

• Judgment of the General Court (Intermediate Chamber) of 30 September 2026.#Állatorvostudományi Egyetem v Council of the European Union.#Implementation of the Union budget – Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2092 – General regime of conditionality for the protection of the Union budget – Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/2506 – Measures for the protection of the Union budget against breaches of the principles of the rule of law in Hungary – Article 2(2) of Implementing Decision 2022/2506 – Prohibition preventing the Commission from entering into legal commitments with any public interest trust or any entity maintained by such a trust – Article 4(1) of Regulation 2020/2092 – Obligation to state reasons – Legal certainty – Legitimate expectations – Rights of the defence – Intensity of judicial review – Proportionality – Right to operate on an undistorted market – Article 16 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Principle of equal treatment and non-discrimination – Plea of illegality.#Case T-133/23.

  judgment · EN · 30 September 2026

  ViewDownloadOpen at official source

Sponsors

• · GCEU · General Court

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.