PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

European Union · Record · CJ

CELEX 62024CJ0412_SUM

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 26 March 2026.#Fauré Le Page Maroquinier SAS and Fauré Le Page Paris SAS v Goyard ST-Honoré SAS.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Trade marks – Directive 2008/95/EC – Article 3(1)(g) – Grounds for refusal of registration or invalidity of a trade mark – Trade mark of such a nature as to deceive the public – Luxury leather goods – Trade mark which includes a number perceived by the relevant public as indicating the year of establishment of a business – Evocation, because that year is in the distant past, of long-standing know-how bestowing on the product concerned a perceived guarantee of quality and a prestigious image – Misleading indication as to the characteristics of the product.#Case C-412/24.

decidedEuropean Union· Court of Justice of the European Union· EN

Introduced

26 March 2026

Last action

Status

decided

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

26 March 2026

Records

Official record CELEX 62024CJ0412_SUM from European Union at Court of Justice of the European Union. Dated 26 March 2026. Status: decided.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

8 official files

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 26 March 2026.#Fauré Le Page Maroquinier SAS and Fauré Le Page Paris SAS v Goyard ST-Honoré SAS.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Trade marks – Directive 2008/95/EC – Article 3(1)(g) – Grounds for refusal of registration or invalidity of a trade mark – Trade mark of such a nature as to deceive the public – Luxury leather goods – Trade mark which includes a number perceived by the relevant public as indicating the year of establishment of a business – Evocation, because that year is in the distant past, of long-standing know-how bestowing on the product concerned a perceived guarantee of quality and a prestigious image – Misleading indication as to the characteristics of the product.#Case C-412/24.

View fileDownload file

  • Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 26 March 2026.#Fauré Le Page Maroquinier SAS and Fauré Le Page Paris SAS v Goyard ST-Honoré SAS.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Trade marks – Directive 2008/95/EC – Article 3(1)(g) – Grounds for refusal of registration or invalidity of a trade mark – Trade mark of such a nature as to deceive the public – Luxury leather goods – Trade mark which includes a number perceived by the relevant public as indicating the year of establishment of a business – Evocation, because that year is in the distant past, of long-standing know-how bestowing on the product concerned a perceived guarantee of quality and a prestigious image – Misleading indication as to the characteristics of the product.#Case C-412/24.

    judgment · EN · 26 March 2026

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • 2026 m. kovo 26 d. Teisingumo Teismo (trečioji kolegija) sprendimas.#Fauré Le Page Maroquinier SAS ir Fauré Le Page Paris SAS prieš Goyard ST-Honoré SAS.#Prašymas priimti prejudicinį sprendimą – Prekių ženklai – Direktyva 2008/95/EB – 3 straipsnio 1 dalies g punktas – Atsisakymo registruoti arba registracijos pripažinimo negaliojančia pagrindai – Visuomenę galintis suklaidinti prekių ženklas – Prabangūs odos gaminiai – Prekių ženklas, kuriame nurodytas skaičius, kurį atitinkama visuomenė supranta kaip įmonės įsteigimo metus – Dėl to, kad įmonė įsteigta prieš daug metų, įsivaizduojama ilgametė praktinė patirtis, užtikrinanti atitinkamo produkto kokybę ir prestižinį įvaizdį – Klaidinanti nuoroda dėl prekės savybių.#Byla C-412/24.

    judgment · LT · 26 March 2026

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Rozsudok Súdneho dvora (tretia komora) z 26. marca 2026.#Fauré Le Page Maroquinier SAS a Fauré Le Page Paris SAS proti Goyard ST-Honoré SAS.#Návrh na začatie prejudiciálneho konania – Ochranné známky – Smernica 2008/95/ES – Článok 3 ods. 1 písm. g) – Dôvody zamietnutia zápisu alebo neplatnosti ochrannej známky – Ochranná známka, ktorá môže klamať verejnosť – Luxusné kožené výrobky – Ochranná známka zahŕňajúca číselný údaj, ktorý príslušná skupina verejnosti vníma ako číselný údaj označujúci rok založenia podniku – Evokovanie dlhodobého knowhow, ktoré priznáva dotknutému tovaru záruku kvality a obraz prestíže, z dôvodu, že tento rok je dávno minulý – Klamlivé údaje o vlastnostiach tovaru.#Vec C-412/24.

    judgment · SK · 26 March 2026

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Rozsudek Soudního dvora (třetího senátu) ze dne 26. března 2026.#Fauré Le Page Maroquinier SAS a Fauré Le Page Paris SAS v. Goyard ST-Honoré SAS.#Řízení o předběžné otázce – Ochranné známky – Směrnice 2008/95/ES – Článek 3 odst. 1 písm. g) – Důvody pro zamítnutí zápisu nebo prohlášení ochranné známky za neplatnou – Ochranná známka, která by mohla klamat veřejnost – Luxusní kožené zboží – Ochranná známka obsahující číslo vnímané relevantní veřejností jako údaj o roce založení podniku – Evokace dlouholetého know-how, které dotčenému výrobku propůjčuje záruku kvality a prestižní image, z důvodu že tento rok je dávný – Klamavý údaj o vlastnostech výrobku.#Věc C-412/24.

    judgment · CS · 26 March 2026

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Acórdão do Tribunal de Justiça (Terceira Secção) de 26 de março de 2026.#Fauré Le Page Maroquinier SAS e Fauré Le Page Paris SAS contra Goyard ST-Honoré SAS.#Reenvio prejudicial — Marcas — Diretiva 2008/95/CE — Artigo 3.°, n.° 1, alínea g) — Motivos de recusa do registo ou de nulidade de uma marca — Marca suscetível de enganar o público — Artigos de marroquinaria de luxo — Marca que inclui um número percecionado pelo público relevante no sentido de indicar um ano de criação de empresa — Evocação, devido à antiguidade desse ano, de um know‑how de longa data que confere ao produto em causa uma garantia de qualidade e uma imagem de prestígio — Indicação enganosa sobre as características do produto.#Processo C-412/24.

    judgment · PT · 26 March 2026

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Tiesas spriedums (trešā palāta), 2026. gada 26. marts.#Fauré Le Page Maroquinier SAS un Fauré Le Page Paris SAS pret Goyard ST-Honoré SAS.#Lūgums sniegt prejudiciālu nolēmumu – Preču zīmes – Direktīva 2008/95/EK – 3. panta 1. punkta g) apakšpunkts – Preču zīmes reģistrācijas atteikuma vai spēkā neesības pamati – Preču zīme, kas var maldināt sabiedrību – Luksusa ādas izstrādājumi – Preču zīme, kas ietver skaitli, kuru konkrētā sabiedrības daļa uztver kā tādu, kas norāda uz uzņēmuma dibināšanas gadu – Atsauce uz ilggadēju zinātību, kas attiecīgajai precei piešķir kvalitātes garantiju un prestižu tēlu, ņemot vērā šī gada senumu – Maldinoša norāde par preces īpašībām.#Lieta C-412/24.

    judgment · LV · 26 March 2026

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Unionin tuomioistuimen tuomio (kolmas jaosto) 26.3.2026.#Fauré Le Page Maroquinier SAS ja Fauré Le Page Paris SAS vastaan Goyard ST-Honoré SAS.#Ennakkoratkaisupyyntö – Tavaramerkit – Direktiivi 2008/95/EY – 3 artiklan 1 kohdan g alakohta – Tavaramerkin rekisteröinnin esteet ja mitättömyysperusteet – Tavaramerkki, joka on omiaan johtamaan yleisöä harhaan – Ylelliset nahkatavarat – Tavaramerkki, joka sisältää numeron, jonka kohdeyleisö katsoo osoittavan yrityksen perustamisvuotta – Vetoaminen kyseisestä vuodesta kuluneen ajan vuoksi pitkäaikaiseen taitotietoon, joka takaa asianomaisen tavaran laadun ja luo mielikuvan arvokkuudesta – Harhaanjohtava ilmaus tavaran ominaisuuksista.#Asia C-412/24.

    judgment · FI · 26 March 2026

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Arrêt de la Cour (troisième chambre) du 26 mars 2026.#Fauré Le Page Maroquinier SAS et Fauré Le Page Paris SAS contre Goyard ST-Honoré SAS.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Marques – Directive 2008/95/CE – Article 3, paragraphe 1, sous g) – Motifs de refus d’enregistrement ou de nullité d’une marque – Marque de nature à tromper le public – Articles de maroquinerie de luxe – Marque incluant un nombre perçu par le public pertinent comme indiquant une année de création d’entreprise – Évocation, en raison de l’ancienneté de cette année, d’un savoir-faire de longue date conférant au produit concerné un gage de qualité et une image de prestige – Indication trompeuse sur les caractéristiques du produit.#Affaire C-412/24.

    judgment · FR · 26 March 2026

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.