European Union · Record · CJ
CELEX 62024CJ0666_RES
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 16 July 2026.#Criminal proceedings against EGB and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Combating terrorism – Article 83(1) TFEU – Directive (EU) 2017/541 – Article 3 – Terrorist offences – Article 4 – Offences relating to a terrorist group – Article 15(1) – Obligation to provide for effective, proportionate and dissuasive criminal penalties – Effectiveness – Principle of legal certainty – Principle of equal treatment and non-discrimination – Primacy of EU law – Principle of sincere cooperation – National amnesty law which provides for the extinction of criminal liability – Acts which have not intentionally caused serious breaches of human rights.#Case C-666/24.
Introduced
16 July 2026
Last action
16 July 2026 · Decided
Status
decided
Sponsors
—
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
16 July 2026
Records
Official record CELEX 62024CJ0666_RES from European Union at Court of Justice of the European Union. Dated 16 July 2026. Status: decided.
Timeline
16 July 2026
Decided
Source: work_date_document
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
16 official files
Domstolens dom (stora avdelningen) av den 16 juli 2026.#Brottmål mot EGB m.fl.#Begäran om förhandsavgörande – och säkerhetspolitik – Artikel 83.1 FEUF – Direktiv (EU) 2017/541 – Artikel 3 – Terroristbrott – Artikel 4 – Brott med anknytning till en terroristgrupp – Artikel 15.1 – Skyldighet att föreskriva effektiva, proportionerliga och avskräckande straffrättsliga påföljder – Ändamålsenlig verkan – Rättssäkerhetsprincipen – Principerna om likabehandling och icke-diskriminering – Unionsrättens företräde – Principen om lojalt samarbete – Nationell amnestilag som medför ansvarsfrihet – Gärningar som begåtts utan att gärningspersonen därigenom uppsåtligen orsakat allvarliga kränkningar av mänskliga rättigheter.#Mål C-666/24.
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Domstolens dom (stora avdelningen) av den 16 juli 2026.#Brottmål mot EGB m.fl.#Begäran om förhandsavgörande – och säkerhetspolitik – Artikel 83.1 FEUF – Direktiv (EU) 2017/541 – Artikel 3 – Terroristbrott – Artikel 4 – Brott med anknytning till en terroristgrupp – Artikel 15.1 – Skyldighet att föreskriva effektiva, proportionerliga och avskräckande straffrättsliga påföljder – Ändamålsenlig verkan – Rättssäkerhetsprincipen – Principerna om likabehandling och icke-diskriminering – Unionsrättens företräde – Principen om lojalt samarbete – Nationell amnestilag som medför ansvarsfrihet – Gärningar som begåtts utan att gärningspersonen därigenom uppsåtligen orsakat allvarliga kränkningar av mänskliga rättigheter.#Mål C-666/24.
judgment · SV · 16 July 2026
Tiesas spriedums (virspalāta), 2026. gada 16. jūlijs.#Kriminālprocess pret EGB u.c.#Lūgums sniegt prejudiciālu nolēmumu – Cīņa pret terorismu – LESD 83. panta 1. punkts – Direktīva (ES) 2017/541 – 3. pants – Teroristu nodarījumi – 4. pants – Nodarījumi, kas saistīti ar teroristu grupu – 15. panta 1. punkts – Pienākums paredzēt iedarbīgus, samērīgus un atturošus kriminālsodus – Lietderīgā iedarbība – Tiesiskās drošības princips – Vienlīdzīgas attieksmes un diskriminācijas aizlieguma principi – Savienības tiesību pārākums – Lojālas sadarbības princips – Valsts amnestijas likums, kas paredz atbrīvošanu no kriminālatbildības – Rīcība, kas nav tīši izraisījusi nopietnus cilvēktiesību pārkāpumus.#Lieta C-666/24.
judgment · LV · 16 July 2026
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Breithiúnas na Cúirte (Mór-Dhlísheomra) 2026 Iúil 16.#Imeachtaí coiriúla i gcoinne EGB e.a.#Tarchur chun réamhrialú – Frithsceimhlitheoireacht – Airteagal 83(1) CFAE – Treoir (AE) 2017/541 – Airteagal 3 – Cionta sceimhlitheoireachta – Airteagal 4 – Cionta a bhaineann le grúpa sceimhlitheoireachta – Airteagal 15(1) – Oibleagáid foráil a dhéanamh maidir le pionóis choiriúla éifeachtúla, chomhréireacha agus athchomhairleacha – Éifeachtacht – Prionsabal na deimhneachta dlíthiúla – Prionsabail na córa comhionainne agus an neamh-idirdhealaithe – Tosaíocht dhlí an Aontais – Prionsabal an chomhair dhílis – Dlí náisiúnta maithiúnais lena bhforáiltear do dhíothú dliteanais choiriúil – Gníomhartha nach raibh ina gcúis le sáruithe tromchúiseacha ar chearta an duine d’aon ghnó.#Cás C-666/24.
judgment · GA · 16 July 2026
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Domstolens dom (Store Afdeling) af 16. juli 2026.#Ministerio Fiscal m.fl. mod EGB m.fl.#Præjudiciel forelæggelse – bekæmpelse af terrorisme – artikel 83, stk. 1, TEUF – direktiv (EU) 2017/541 – artikel 3 – terrorhandlinger – artikel 4 – lovovertrædelser med forbindelse til en terrorgruppe – artikel 15, stk. 1 – forpligtelse til at fastsætte strafferetlige sanktioner, der er effektive, står i et rimeligt forhold til lovovertrædelsen og har afskrækkende virkning – effektiv virkning – retssikkerhedsprincippet – ligebehandlingsprincippet og princippet om forbud mod forskelsbehandling – EU-rettens forrang – princippet om loyalt samarbejde – national amnestilov, hvorefter strafansvar bortfalder – handlinger, der ikke forsætligt har forvoldt alvorlige krænkelser af menneskerettighederne.#Sag C-666/24.
judgment · DA · 16 July 2026
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Wyrok Trybunału (wielka izba) z dnia 16 lipca 2026 r.#Ministerio Fiscal i in. przeciwko EGB i in.#Odesłanie prejudycjalne – Zwalczanie terroryzmu – Artykuł 83 ust. 1 TFUE – Dyrektywa (UE) 2017/541 – Artykuł 3 – Przestępstwa terrorystyczne – Artykuł 4 – Przestępstwa dotyczące grupy terrorystycznej – Artykuł 15 ust. 1 – Obowiązek ustanowienia skutecznych, proporcjonalnych i odstraszających sankcji karnych – Skuteczność (effet utile) – Zasada pewności prawa – Zasady równego traktowania i niedyskryminacji – Pierwszeństwo prawa Unii – Zasada lojalnej współpracy – Krajowa ustawa o abolicji przewidująca wygaśnięcie odpowiedzialności karnej – Czyny, które nie doprowadziły do umyślnych poważnych naruszeń praw człowieka.#Sprawa C-666/24.
judgment · PL · 16 July 2026
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Sentencia del Tribunal de Justicia (Gran Sala) de 16 de julio de 2026.#Procedimento penal entablado contra EGB y otros.#Procedimiento prejudicial — Lucha contra el terrorismo — Artículo 83 TFUE, apartado 1 — Directiva (UE) 2017/541 — Artículo 3 — Delitos de terrorismo — Artículo 4 — Delitos relacionados con un grupo terrorista — Artículo 15, apartado 1 — Obligación de establecer sanciones penales eficaces, proporcionadas y disuasorias — Efecto útil — Principio de seguridad jurídica — Principios de igualdad de trato y de no discriminación — Primacía del Derecho de la Unión — Principio de cooperación leal — Ley nacional de amnistía que establece la extinción de la responsabilidad penal — Actos que no hayan causado de forma intencionada graves violaciones de derechos humanos.#Asunto C-666/24.
judgment · ES · 16 July 2026
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Urteil des Gerichtshofs (Große Kammer) vom 16. Juli 2026.#Strafverfahren gegen EGB u. a.#Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung – Terrorismusbekämpfung – Art. 83 Abs. 1 AEUV – Richtlinie (EU) 2017/541 – Art. 3 – Terroristische Straftaten – Art. 4 – Straftaten im Zusammenhang mit einer terroristischen Vereinigung – Art. 15 Abs. 1 – Verpflichtung, wirksame, angemessene und abschreckende Strafen vorzusehen – Praktische Wirksamkeit – Grundsatz der Rechtssicherheit – Grundsätze der Gleichbehandlung und der Nichtdiskriminierung – Vorrang des Unionsrechts – Grundsatz der loyalen Zusammenarbeit – Nationales Amnestiegesetz, das das Erlöschen der strafrechtlichen Haftung vorsieht – Handlungen, die nicht vorsätzlich schwere Menschenrechtsverletzungen verursacht haben.#Rechtssache C-666/24.
judgment · DE · 16 July 2026
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Arrêt de la Cour (grande chambre) du 16 juillet 2026.#Ministerio Fiscal e.a. contre EGB e.a.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Lutte contre le terrorisme – Article 83, paragraphe 1, TFUE – Directive (UE) 2017/541 – Article 3 – Infractions terroristes – Article 4 – Infractions liées à un groupe terroriste – Article 15, paragraphe 1 – Obligation de prévoir des sanctions pénales effectives, proportionnées et dissuasives – Effet utile – Principe de sécurité juridique – Principes d’égalité de traitement et de non-discrimination – Primauté du droit de l’Union – Principe de coopération loyale – Loi nationale d’amnistie qui prévoit l’extinction de la responsabilité pénale – Actes n’ayant pas intentionnellement causé de graves violations des droits de l’homme.#Affaire C-666/24.
judgment · FR · 16 July 2026
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Unionin tuomioistuimen tuomio (suuri jaosto) 16.7.2026.#Rikosoikeudenkäynti, jossa vastaajana on EGB ym.#Ennakkoratkaisupyyntö – Terrorismin torjuminen – SEUT 83 artiklan 1 kohta – Direktiivi (EU) 2017/541 – 3 artikla – Terrorismirikokset – 4 artikla – Terroristiryhmään liittyvät rikokset – 15 artiklan 1 kohta – Velvollisuus säätää tehokkaista, oikeasuhteisista ja varoittavista rikosoikeudellisista seuraamuksista – Tehokas vaikutus – Oikeus tulla kuulluksi – Yhdenvertaisen kohtelun ja syrjintäkiellon periaatteet – Unionin oikeuden ensisijaisuus – Vilpittömän yhteistyön periaate – Kansallinen armahduslaki, jossa säädetään rikosoikeudellisen vastuun lakkaamisesta – Teot, joilla ei ole tahallisesti aiheutettu vakavia ihmisoikeusrikkomuksia.#Asia C-666/24.
judgment · FI · 16 July 2026
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Sentenza tal-Qorti tal-Ġustizzja (Awla Manja) tas-16 ta’ Lulju 2026.#Proċeduri kriminali kontra EGB et.#Rinviju għal deċiżjoni preliminari – Ġlieda kontra t-terroriżmu – Artikolu 83(1) TFUE – Direttiva (UE) 2017/541 – Artikolu 3 – Reati terroristiċi – Artikolu 4 – Reati relatati ma’ grupp terroristiku – Artikolu 15(1) – Obbligu li jiġu previsti sanzjonijiet kriminali effettivi, proporzjonati u dissważivi – Effett utli – Prinċipju ta’ ċertezza legali – Prinċipji ta’ ugwaljanza fit-trattament u ta’ nondiskriminazzjoni – Supremazija tad-dritt tal-Unjoni – Prinċipju ta’ kooperazzjoni leali – Liġi nazzjonali ta’ amnestija li tipprevedi l-estinzjoni tar-responsabbiltà kriminali – Atti li ma jkunux ikkawżaw intenzjonalment ksur gravi tad-drittijiet tal-bniedem.#Kawża C-666/24.
judgment · MT · 16 July 2026
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Sodba Sodišča (veliki senat) z dne 16. julija 2026.#Ministerio Fiscal in drugi proti EGB in drugim.#Predhodno odločanje – Boj proti terorizmu – Člen 83(1) PDEU – Direktiva (EU) 2017/541 – Člen 3 – Teroristična kazniva dejanja – Člen 4 – Kazniva dejanja, povezana s teroristično skupino – Člen 15(1) – Obveznost določitve učinkovitih, sorazmernih in odvračilnih kazenskih sankcij – Polni učinek – Načelo pravne varnosti – Načeli enakega obravnavanja in prepovedi diskriminacije – Primarnost prava Unije – Načelo lojalnega sodelovanja – Nacionalni zakon o amnestiji, ki določa prenehanje kazenske odgovornosti – Dejanja, s katerimi niso bile namerno povzročene hude kršitve človekovih pravic.#Zadeva C-666/24.
judgment · SL · 16 July 2026
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Hotărârea Curții (Marea Cameră) din 16 iulie 2026.#Ministerio Fiscal ș.a. împotriva lui EGB ș.a.#Trimitere preliminară – Combaterea terorismului – Articolul 83 alineatul (1) TFUE – Directiva (UE) 2017/541 – Articolul 3 – Infracțiuni de terorism – Articolul 4 – Infracțiuni legate de un grup terorist – Articolul 15 alineatul (1) – Obligația de a prevedea sancțiuni penale eficace, proporționale și disuasive – Efect util – Principiul securității juridice – Principiile egalității de tratament și nediscriminării – Supremația dreptului Uniunii – Principiul cooperării loiale – Lege națională de amnistie care prevede stingerea răspunderii penale – Acte care nu au cauzat în mod intenționat încălcări grave ale drepturilor omului.#Cauza C-666/24.
judgment · RO · 16 July 2026
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Sentenza della Corte (Grande Sezione) del 16 luglio 2026.#Procedimento penale a carico di EGB e a.#Rinvio pregiudiziale – Lotta al terrorismo – Articolo 83, paragrafo 1, TFUE – Direttiva (UE) 2017/541 – Articolo 3 – Reati di terrorismo – Articolo 4 – Reati riconducibili a un gruppo terroristico – Articolo 15, paragrafo 1 – Obbligo di prevedere sanzioni penali effettive, proporzionate e dissuasive – Effetto utile – Principio della certezza del diritto – Principi di parità di trattamento e di non discriminazione – Primato del diritto dell’Unione – Principio di leale cooperazione – Legge nazionale di amnistia che prevede l’estinzione della responsabilità penale – Atti che non hanno causato intenzionalmente gravi violazioni dei diritti umani.#Causa C-666/24.
judgment · IT · 16 July 2026
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Acórdão do Tribunal de Justiça (Grande Secção) de 16 de julho de 2026.#Processo penal contra EGB e o.#Reenvio prejudicial — Luta contra o terrorismo — Artigo 83.°, n.° 1, TFUE — Diretiva (UE) 2017/541 — Artigo 3.° — Infrações terroristas — Artigo 4.° — Infrações relacionadas com um grupo terrorista — Artigo 15.°, n.° 1 — Obrigação de prever sanções penais efetivas, proporcionadas e dissuasivas — Efeito útil — Princípio da segurança jurídica — Princípios da igualdade de tratamento e da não discriminação — Primado do direito da União — Princípio da cooperação leal — Lei nacional de amnistia que prevê a extinção da responsabilidade penal — Atos que não causaram dolosamente violações graves de direitos humanos.#Processo C-666/24.
judgment · PT · 16 July 2026
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
2026 m. liepos 16 d. Teisingumo Teismo (didžioji kolegija) sprendimas.#Baudžiamoji byla prieš EGB ir kt.#Prašymas priimti prejudicinį sprendimą – Kova su terorizmu – SESV 83 straipsnio 1 dalis – Direktyva (ES) 2017/541 – 3 straipsnis – Teroristiniai nusikaltimai – 4 straipsnis – Su teroristine grupe susijusios nusikalstamos veikos – 15 straipsnio 1 dalis – Pareiga numatyti veiksmingas, proporcingas ir atgrasančias baudžiamąsias sankcijas – Veiksmingumas – Teisinio saugumo principas – Vienodo požiūrio ir nediskriminavimo principai – Sąjungos teisės viršenybė – Lojalaus bendradarbiavimo principas – Nacionalinis amnestijos įstatymas, kuriame numatytas baudžiamosios atsakomybės panaikinimas – Veikos, dėl kurių nebuvo tyčia padaryta sunkių žmogaus teisių pažeidimų.#Byla C-666/24.
judgment · LT · 16 July 2026
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 16 July 2026.#Criminal proceedings against EGB and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Combating terrorism – Article 83(1) TFEU – Directive (EU) 2017/541 – Article 3 – Terrorist offences – Article 4 – Offences relating to a terrorist group – Article 15(1) – Obligation to provide for effective, proportionate and dissuasive criminal penalties – Effectiveness – Principle of legal certainty – Principle of equal treatment and non-discrimination – Primacy of EU law – Principle of sincere cooperation – National amnesty law which provides for the extinction of criminal liability – Acts which have not intentionally caused serious breaches of human rights.#Case C-666/24.
judgment · EN · 16 July 2026
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Leesvertaling
Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.
Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.
Sponsors
- · CJ · Court of Justice of the European Union
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.
- Official source: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:62024CJ0666_RES
- Open data entity: http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/c3986c34-8102-11f1-bf5e-01aa75ed71a1
- eurlex · 62024CJ0666_RES · source updated 16 July 2026