PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

European Union · Record · CJ

CELEX 62024CJ0752_SUM

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 April 2026.#mBank S.A. v KŁ and JŁ.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in contracts concluded with consumers – Effects of the finding of the unfair nature of a term – Nullity of the credit contract – Actions for restitution – Limitation period for the professional's action – Interruption of the period of prescription – Principle of effectiveness – Principle of legal certainty – Principle of proportionality – Right of access to a court – Unjust enrichment.#Case C-752/24.

decidedEuropean Union· Court of Justice of the European Union· FR

Introduced

16 April 2026

Last action

Status

decided

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

16 April 2026

Records

Official record CELEX 62024CJ0752_SUM from European Union at Court of Justice of the European Union. Dated 16 April 2026. Status: decided.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

  • Arrêt de la Cour (neuvième chambre) du 16 avril 2026.#mBank S.A. contre KŁ et JŁ.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Protection des consommateurs – Directive 93/13/CEE – Clauses abusives dans les contrats conclus avec les consommateurs – Effets de la constatation du caractère abusif d’une clause – Nullité du contrat de crédit – Actions en restitution – Délai de prescription de l’action du professionnel – Interruption du délai de prescription – Principe d’effectivité – Principe de sécurité juridique – Principe de proportionnalité – Droit d’accès à un tribunal – Enrichissement sans cause.#Affaire C-752/24.

    judgment · FR · 16 April 2026

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.