Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

European Union · Record · CJ

CELEX 62024CJ0876

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 17 September 2026.#I.G.V. v Vueling Airlines SA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Carriage of passengers and their baggage by air – Regulation (EC) No 2027/97 – Article 1 – Article 3(1) – Carriage by air within a single Member State – Montreal Convention – Article 33(1) – Court having jurisdiction – Place where the carrier has a place of business through which the contract has been entered into – Contract of carriage entered into online – Loss of baggage.#Case C-876/24.

decidedEuropean Union· Court of Justice of the European Union· EN

Introduced

17 September 2026

Last action

Status

decided

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

17 September 2026

Official titles

Authentic titles published by the source. The stored canonical title is not replaced.

23 official languages
  • Bulgarian

    Решение на Съда (трети състав) от 17 септември 2026 г.#I.G.V. срещу Vueling Airlines SA.#Преюдициално запитване — Въздушен превоз на пътници и на техния багаж — Регламент (ЕО) № 2027/97 — Член 1 — Член 3, параграф 1 — Въздушен превоз, осъществен на територията на отделна държава членка — Конвенция от Монреал — Член 33, параграф 1 — Компетентна юрисдикция — Място на дейност на превозвача, чрез което е сключен договорът — Договор за превоз, сключен онлайн — Загуба на багаж.#Дело C-876/24.

  • Czech

    Rozsudek Soudního dvora (třetího senátu) ze dne 17. září 2026.#I.G.V. v. Vueling Airlines SA.#Řízení o předběžné otázce – Letecká doprava cestujících a jejich zavazadel – Nařízení (ES) č. 2027/97 – Článek 1 – Článek 3 odst. 1 – Letecká doprava uskutečňovaná na území jediného členského státu – Montrealská úmluva – Článek 33 odst. 1 – Příslušný soud – Místo provozovny dopravce, kde byla uzavřena smlouva – Přepravní smlouva uzavřená on-line – Ztráta zavazadel.#Věc C-876/24.

  • Danish

    Domstolens dom (Tredje Afdeling) af 17. september 2026.#I.G.V. mod Vueling Airlines SA.#Præjudiciel forelæggelse – lufttransport af passagerer og deres bagage – forordning (EF) nr. 2027/97 – artikel 1 – artikel 3, stk. 1 – lufttransport inden for én medlemsstat – Montrealkonventionen – artikel 33, stk. 1 – kompetent domstol – det sted, hvor luftfartsselskabet har det kontor, som afsluttede kontrakten – transportkontrakt indgået online – bortkomst af bagage.#Sag C-876/24.

  • German

    Urteil des Gerichtshofs (Dritte Kammer) vom 17. September 2026.#I.G.V. gegen Vueling Airlines SA.#Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung – Beförderung von Fluggästen und deren Gepäck im Luftverkehr – Verordnung (EG) Nr. 2027/97 – Art. 1 – Art. 3 Abs. 1 – Beförderung im Luftverkehr innerhalb eines einzelnen Mitgliedstaats – Übereinkommen von Montreal – Art. 33 Abs. 1 – Zuständiges Gericht – Ort, an dem sich die Geschäftsstelle des Luftfrachtführers befindet, durch die der Vertrag geschlossen worden ist – Online geschlossener Beförderungsvertrag – Verlust des Reisegepäcks.#Rechtssache C-876/24.

  • Greek

    Απόφαση του Δικαστηρίου (τρίτο τμήμα) της 17ης Σεπτεμβρίου 2026.#I.G.V. κατά Vueling Airlines SA.#Προδικαστική παραπομπή – Αεροπορική μεταφορά επιβατών και των αποσκευών τους – Κανονισμός (ΕΚ) 2027/97 – Άρθρο 1 – Άρθρο 3, παράγραφος 1 – Αερομεταφορές που εκτελούνται στο εσωτερικό ενός και μόνον κράτους μέλους – Σύμβαση του Μόντρεαλ – Άρθρο 33, παράγραφος 1 – Δικαιοδοσία – Τόπος στον οποίο ο μεταφορέας έχει εγκατάσταση μέσω της οποίας συνήφθη η σύμβαση – Σύμβαση μεταφοράς συναφθείσα μέσω διαδικτύου – Απώλεια αποσκευών.#Υπόθεση C-876/24.

  • Spanish

    Sentencia del Tribunal de Justicia (Sala Tercera) de 17 de septiembre de 2026.#I.G.V. contra Vueling Airlines SA.#Procedimiento prejudicial — Transporte aéreo de pasajeros y su equipaje — Reglamento (CE) n.º 2027/97 — Artículo 1 — Artículo 3, apartado 1 — Transporte aéreo en el interior de un Estado miembro — Convenio de Montreal — Artículo 33, apartado 1 — Órgano jurisdiccional competente — Lugar en que el transportista tiene una oficina por cuyo conducto se ha celebrado el contrato — Contrato de transporte celebrado en línea — Pérdida del equipaje.#Asunto C-876/24.

  • Estonian

    Euroopa Kohtu otsus (kolmas koda), 17.9.2026.#I.G.V. versus Vueling Airlines SA.#Eelotsusetaotlus – Reisijate ja nende pagasi õhuvedu – Määrus (EÜ) nr 2027/97 – Artikkel 1 – Artikli 3 lõige 1 – Liikmesriigisisene õhuvedu – Montréali konventsioon – Artikli 33 lõige 1 – Kohtualluvus – Vedaja tegevuskoht, mille kaudu leping sõlmiti – Interneti teel sõlmitud veoleping – Pagasi kaotsiminek.#Kohtuasi C-876/24.

  • Finnish

    Unionin tuomioistuimen tuomio (kolmas jaosto) 17.9.2026.#I.G.V. vastaan Vueling Airlines SA.#Ennakkoratkaisupyyntö – Matkustajien ja heidän matkatavaroidensa ilmakuljetukset – Asetus (EY) N:o 2027/97 – 1 artikla – 3 artiklan 1 kohta – Jäsenvaltion sisäinen ilmakuljetus – Montrealin yleissopimus – 33 artiklan 1 kappale – Toimivaltainen tuomioistuin – Paikka, jossa rahdinkuljettajalla on toimipaikka, jonka välityksellä kuljetussopimus on tehty – Verkossa tehty kuljetussopimus – Matkatavaroiden katoaminen.#Asia C-876/24.

  • French

    Arrêt de la Cour (troisième chambre) du 17 septembre 2026.#I.G.V. contre Vueling Airlines SA.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Transport aérien de passagers et de leurs bagages – Règlement (CE) no 2027/97 – Article 1er – Article 3, paragraphe 1 – Transport aérien effectué sur le territoire d’un seul État membre – Convention de Montréal – Article 33, paragraphe 1 – Juridiction compétente – Lieu où le transporteur possède un établissement par le soin duquel le contrat a été conclu – Contrat de transport conclu en ligne – Perte des bagages.#Affaire C-876/24.

  • Irish

    Breithiúnas na Cúirte (An Tríú Dlísheomra) 2026 Méan Fómhair 17.#I.G.V. v Vueling Airlines SA.#Tarchur chun réamhrialú – Iompar paisinéirí agus a gcuid bagáiste d’aer – Rialachán (CE) Uimh. 2027/97 – Airteagal 1 – Airteagal 3(1) – Iompar d’aer laistigh de chríoch Ballstáit aonair – Coinbhinsiún Montréal – Airteagal 33(1) – An chúirt a bhfuil dlínse aici – Áit ina bhfuil bunaíocht ag an iompróir inar tugadh an conradh i gcrích – Conradh iompair arna thabhairt i gcrích ar líne – Bagáiste a chailleadh.#Cás C-876/24.

  • Croatian

    Presuda Suda (treće vijeće) 17. rujna 2026.#I.G.V. protiv Vueling Airlines SA.#Zahtjev za prethodnu odluku – Zračni prijevoz putnika i njihove prtljage – Uredba (EZ) br. 2027/97 – Članak 1. – Članak 3. stavak 1. – Zračni prijevoz na državnom području samo jedne države članice – Montrealska konvencija – Članak 33. stavak 1. – Nadležni sud – Mjesto u kojem prijevoznik ima poslovnu jedinicu posredstvom koje je sklopljen ugovor – Ugovor o prijevozu sklopljen na internetu – Gubitak prtljage.#Predmet C-876/24.

  • Hungarian

    A Bíróság ítélete (harmadik tanács), 2026. szeptember 17.#I.G.V. kontra Vueling Airlines SA.#Előzetes döntéshozatal – Utasok és poggyászuk légi szállítása – 2027/97/EK rendelet – 1. cikk – A 3. cikk (1) bekezdése – Egyetlen tagállam területén végzett légi szállítás – Montreali Egyezmény – A 33. cikk (1) bekezdése – Joghatósággal rendelkező bíróság – Az a hely, ahol a fuvarozó olyan üzleti tevékenységet folytat, amelyen keresztül a szerződést megkötötte – Online kötött szállítási szerződés – Poggyász elvesztése.#C-876/24. sz. ügy.

  • Italian

    Sentenza della Corte (Terza Sezione) del 17 settembre 2026.#I.G.V. contro Vueling Airlines SA.#Rinvio pregiudiziale – Trasporto aereo dei passeggeri e dei loro bagagli – Regolamento (CE) n. 2027/97 – Articolo 1 – Articolo 3, paragrafo 1 – Trasporto aereo effettuato in un unico Stato membro – Convenzione di Montreal – Articolo 33, paragrafo 1 – Competenza giurisdizionale – Luogo in cui il vettore possiede un’impresa che ha provveduto a stipulare il contratto – Contratto di trasporto concluso online – Perdita dei bagagli.#Causa C-876/24.

  • Lithuanian

    2026 m. rugsėjo 17 d. Teisingumo Teismo (trečioji kolegija) sprendimas.#I.G.V. prieš Vueling Airlines SA.#Prašymas priimti prejudicinį sprendimą – Keleivių ir jų bagažo vežimas oro transportu – Reglamentas (EB) Nr. 2027/97 – 1 straipsnis – 3 straipsnio 1 dalis – Vežimas oro transportu tos pačios valstybės narės teritorijoje – Monrealio konvencija – 33 straipsnio 1 dalis – Teismingumas – Vežėjo ūkinė – komercinė verslo vieta, kurioje buvo sudaryta sutartis – Internetu sudaryta vežimo sutartis – Bagažo praradimas.#Byla C-876/24.

  • Latvian

    Tiesas spriedums (trešā palāta), 2026. gada 17. septembris.#I.G.V. pret Vueling Airlines SA.#Lūgums sniegt prejudiciālu nolēmumu – Pasažieru un viņu bagāžas gaisa pārvadājumi – Regula (EK) Nr. 2027/97 – 1. pants – 3. panta 1. punkts – Gaisa pārvadājumi vienas dalībvalsts teritorijā – Monreālas konvencija – 33. panta 1. punkts – Tiesa, kurai ir jurisdikcija – Vieta, kur pārvadātājam ir uzņēmējdarbība, par ko līgums ticis noslēgts – Tiešsaistē noslēgts pārvadājuma līgums – Bagāžas nozaudēšana.#Lieta C-876/24.

  • Maltese

    Sentenza tal-Qorti tal-Ġustizzja (It-Tielet Awla) tas-17 ta’ Settembru 2026.#I.G.V. vs Vueling Airlines SA.#Rinviju għal deċiżjoni preliminari – Trasport bl-ajru ta’ passiġġieri u l-bagalji tagħhom – Regolament (KE) Nru 2027/97 – Artikolu 1 – Artikolu 3(1) – Trasport bl-ajru mwettaq fit-territorju ta’ Stat Membru wieħed biss – Konvenzjoni ta’ Montréal – Artikolu 33(1) – Qorti kompetenti – Post fejn it-trasportatur għandu uffiċċju li permezz tiegħu ġie konkluż il-kuntratt – Kuntratt ta’ trasport konkluż online – Telf tal-bagalji.#Kawża C-876/24.

  • Dutch

    Arrest van het Hof (Derde kamer) van 17 september 2026.#I.G.V. tegen Vueling Airlines SA.#Prejudiciële verwijzing – Luchtvervoer van passagiers en hun bagage – Verordening (EG) nr. 2027/97 – Artikel 1 – Artikel 3, lid 1 – Luchtvervoer op het grondgebied van één enkele lidstaat – Verdrag van Montreal – Artikel 33, lid 1 – Bevoegde rechter – Plaats waar de vervoerder een vestiging heeft, door de zorg waarvan de overeenkomst is gesloten – Online gesloten vervoersovereenkomst – Verlies van bagage.#Zaak C-876/24.

  • Polish

    Wyrok Trybunału (trzecia izba) z dnia 17 września 2026 r.#I.G.V. przeciwko Vueling Airlines SA.#Odesłanie prejudycjalne – Przewóz pasażerów i ich bagażu drogą powietrzną – Rozporządzenie (WE) nr 2027/97 – Artykuł 1 – Artykuł 3 ust. 1 – Przewóz lotniczy wewnątrz jednego państwa członkowskiego – Konwencja montrealska – Artykuł 33 ust. 1 – Właściwość sądów – Miejsce, gdzie przewoźnik posiada placówkę, za pośrednictwem której została zawarta umowa – Umowa przewozu zawarta przez Internet – Zaginięcie bagażu.#Sprawa C-876/24.

  • Portuguese

    Acórdão do Tribunal de Justiça (Terceira Secção) de 17 de setembro de 2026.#I.G.V. contra Vueling Airlines SA.#Reenvio prejudicial — Transporte aéreo de passageiros e respetiva bagagem — Regulamento (CE) n.° 2027/97 — Artigo 1.° — Artigo 3.°, n.° 1 — Transporte aéreo efetuado no território de um único Estado‑Membro — Convenção de Montreal — Artigo 33.°, n.° 1 — Jurisdição — Lugar do estabelecimento da transportadora em que foi celebrado o contrato — Contrato de transporte celebrado em linha — Perda de bagagem.#Processo C-876/24.

  • Romanian

    Hotărârea Curții (Camera a treia) din 17 septembrie 2026.#I.G.V. împotriva Vueling Airlines SA.#Trimitere preliminară – Transport aerian de pasageri și de bagaje ale acestora – Regulamentul (CE) nr. 2027/97 – Articolul 1 – Articolul 3 alineatul (1) – Transport aerian efectuat pe teritoriul unui singur stat membru – Convenția de la Montreal – Articolul 33 alineatul (1) – Instanța competentă – Sediul de afaceri al transportatorului unde a fost încheiat contractul – Contract de transport încheiat online – Pierderea bagajelor.#Cauza C-876/24.

  • Slovak

    Rozsudok Súdneho dvora (tretia komora) zo 17. septembra 2026.#I.G.V. v. Vueling Airlines SA.#Návrh na začatie prejudiciálneho konania – Preprava cestujúcich a ich batožiny v leteckej doprave – Nariadenie (ES) č. 2027/97 – Článok 1 – Článok 3 ods. 1 – Preprava v leteckej doprave v rámci jedného členského štátu – Montrealský dohovor – Článok 33 ods. 1 – Príslušný súd – Miesto, kde má dopravca obchodné miesto, v ktorom bola uzavretá zmluva – Zmluva o preprave uzavretá online – Strata batožiny.#Vec C-876/24.

  • Slovenian

    Sodba Sodišča (tretji senat) z dne 17. septembra 2026.#I. G. V. proti Vueling Airlines SA.#Predhodno odločanje – Letalski prevoz potnikov in njihove prtljage – Uredba (ES) št. 2027/97 – Člen 1 – Člen 3(1) – Letalski prevoz znotraj ozemlja ene same države članice – Montrealska konvencija – Člen 33(1) – Pristojno sodišče – Kraj, kjer ima prevoznik poslovno enoto, prek katere je bila sklenjena pogodba – Pogodba o prevozu, sklenjena prek spleta – Izguba prtljage.#Zadeva C-876/24.

  • Swedish

    Domstolens dom (tredje avdelningen) av den 17 september 2026.#I.G.V. mot Vueling Airlines SA.#Begäran om förhandsavgörande – Lufttransport av passagerare och deras bagage – Förordning (EG) nr 2027/97 – Artikel 1 – Artikel 3.1 – Lufttransport inom en enda medlemsstat – Montrealkonventionen – Artikel 33.1 – Behörig domstol – Den ort där transportören har ett kontor genom vilket avtalet slutits – Transportavtal som ingåtts online – Förlorat bagage.#Mål C-876/24.

Records

Official record CELEX 62024CJ0876 from European Union at Court of Justice of the European Union. Dated 17 September 2026. Status: decided.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

24 official files

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 17 September 2026.#I.G.V. v Vueling Airlines SA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Carriage of passengers and their baggage by air – Regulation (EC) No 2027/97 – Article 1 – Article 3(1) – Carriage by air within a single Member State – Montreal Convention – Article 33(1) – Court having jurisdiction – Place where the carrier has a place of business through which the contract has been entered into – Contract of carriage entered into online – Loss of baggage.#Case C-876/24.

View fileDownload file

  • Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 17 September 2026.#I.G.V. v Vueling Airlines SA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Carriage of passengers and their baggage by air – Regulation (EC) No 2027/97 – Article 1 – Article 3(1) – Carriage by air within a single Member State – Montreal Convention – Article 33(1) – Court having jurisdiction – Place where the carrier has a place of business through which the contract has been entered into – Contract of carriage entered into online – Loss of baggage.#Case C-876/24.

    judgment · EN · 17 September 2026

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 17 September 2026.#I.G.V. v Vueling Airlines SA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Carriage of passengers and their baggage by air – Regulation (EC) No 2027/97 – Article 1 – Article 3(1) – Carriage by air within a single Member State – Montreal Convention – Article 33(1) – Court having jurisdiction – Place where the carrier has a place of business through which the contract has been entered into – Contract of carriage entered into online – Loss of baggage.#Case C-876/24.

    judgment · CS · 17 September 2026

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 17 September 2026.#I.G.V. v Vueling Airlines SA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Carriage of passengers and their baggage by air – Regulation (EC) No 2027/97 – Article 1 – Article 3(1) – Carriage by air within a single Member State – Montreal Convention – Article 33(1) – Court having jurisdiction – Place where the carrier has a place of business through which the contract has been entered into – Contract of carriage entered into online – Loss of baggage.#Case C-876/24.

    judgment · RO · 17 September 2026

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 17 September 2026.#I.G.V. v Vueling Airlines SA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Carriage of passengers and their baggage by air – Regulation (EC) No 2027/97 – Article 1 – Article 3(1) – Carriage by air within a single Member State – Montreal Convention – Article 33(1) – Court having jurisdiction – Place where the carrier has a place of business through which the contract has been entered into – Contract of carriage entered into online – Loss of baggage.#Case C-876/24.

    judgment · PL · 17 September 2026

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 17 September 2026.#I.G.V. v Vueling Airlines SA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Carriage of passengers and their baggage by air – Regulation (EC) No 2027/97 – Article 1 – Article 3(1) – Carriage by air within a single Member State – Montreal Convention – Article 33(1) – Court having jurisdiction – Place where the carrier has a place of business through which the contract has been entered into – Contract of carriage entered into online – Loss of baggage.#Case C-876/24.

    judgment · HR · 17 September 2026

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 17 September 2026.#I.G.V. v Vueling Airlines SA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Carriage of passengers and their baggage by air – Regulation (EC) No 2027/97 – Article 1 – Article 3(1) – Carriage by air within a single Member State – Montreal Convention – Article 33(1) – Court having jurisdiction – Place where the carrier has a place of business through which the contract has been entered into – Contract of carriage entered into online – Loss of baggage.#Case C-876/24.

    judgment · ET · 17 September 2026

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 17 September 2026.#I.G.V. v Vueling Airlines SA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Carriage of passengers and their baggage by air – Regulation (EC) No 2027/97 – Article 1 – Article 3(1) – Carriage by air within a single Member State – Montreal Convention – Article 33(1) – Court having jurisdiction – Place where the carrier has a place of business through which the contract has been entered into – Contract of carriage entered into online – Loss of baggage.#Case C-876/24.

    judgment · SV · 17 September 2026

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 17 September 2026.#I.G.V. v Vueling Airlines SA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Carriage of passengers and their baggage by air – Regulation (EC) No 2027/97 – Article 1 – Article 3(1) – Carriage by air within a single Member State – Montreal Convention – Article 33(1) – Court having jurisdiction – Place where the carrier has a place of business through which the contract has been entered into – Contract of carriage entered into online – Loss of baggage.#Case C-876/24.

    judgment · MT · 17 September 2026

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 17 September 2026.#I.G.V. v Vueling Airlines SA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Carriage of passengers and their baggage by air – Regulation (EC) No 2027/97 – Article 1 – Article 3(1) – Carriage by air within a single Member State – Montreal Convention – Article 33(1) – Court having jurisdiction – Place where the carrier has a place of business through which the contract has been entered into – Contract of carriage entered into online – Loss of baggage.#Case C-876/24.

    judgment · LT · 17 September 2026

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 17 September 2026.#I.G.V. v Vueling Airlines SA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Carriage of passengers and their baggage by air – Regulation (EC) No 2027/97 – Article 1 – Article 3(1) – Carriage by air within a single Member State – Montreal Convention – Article 33(1) – Court having jurisdiction – Place where the carrier has a place of business through which the contract has been entered into – Contract of carriage entered into online – Loss of baggage.#Case C-876/24.

    judgment · DE · 17 September 2026

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 17 September 2026.#I.G.V. v Vueling Airlines SA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Carriage of passengers and their baggage by air – Regulation (EC) No 2027/97 – Article 1 – Article 3(1) – Carriage by air within a single Member State – Montreal Convention – Article 33(1) – Court having jurisdiction – Place where the carrier has a place of business through which the contract has been entered into – Contract of carriage entered into online – Loss of baggage.#Case C-876/24.

    judgment · HU · 17 September 2026

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 17 September 2026.#I.G.V. v Vueling Airlines SA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Carriage of passengers and their baggage by air – Regulation (EC) No 2027/97 – Article 1 – Article 3(1) – Carriage by air within a single Member State – Montreal Convention – Article 33(1) – Court having jurisdiction – Place where the carrier has a place of business through which the contract has been entered into – Contract of carriage entered into online – Loss of baggage.#Case C-876/24.

    judgment · GA · 17 September 2026

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 17 September 2026.#I.G.V. v Vueling Airlines SA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Carriage of passengers and their baggage by air – Regulation (EC) No 2027/97 – Article 1 – Article 3(1) – Carriage by air within a single Member State – Montreal Convention – Article 33(1) – Court having jurisdiction – Place where the carrier has a place of business through which the contract has been entered into – Contract of carriage entered into online – Loss of baggage.#Case C-876/24.

    judgment · LV · 17 September 2026

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 17 September 2026.#I.G.V. v Vueling Airlines SA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Carriage of passengers and their baggage by air – Regulation (EC) No 2027/97 – Article 1 – Article 3(1) – Carriage by air within a single Member State – Montreal Convention – Article 33(1) – Court having jurisdiction – Place where the carrier has a place of business through which the contract has been entered into – Contract of carriage entered into online – Loss of baggage.#Case C-876/24.

    judgment · SK · 17 September 2026

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 17 September 2026.#I.G.V. v Vueling Airlines SA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Carriage of passengers and their baggage by air – Regulation (EC) No 2027/97 – Article 1 – Article 3(1) – Carriage by air within a single Member State – Montreal Convention – Article 33(1) – Court having jurisdiction – Place where the carrier has a place of business through which the contract has been entered into – Contract of carriage entered into online – Loss of baggage.#Case C-876/24.

    judgment · EL · 17 September 2026

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 17 September 2026.#I.G.V. v Vueling Airlines SA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Carriage of passengers and their baggage by air – Regulation (EC) No 2027/97 – Article 1 – Article 3(1) – Carriage by air within a single Member State – Montreal Convention – Article 33(1) – Court having jurisdiction – Place where the carrier has a place of business through which the contract has been entered into – Contract of carriage entered into online – Loss of baggage.#Case C-876/24.

    judgment · NL · 17 September 2026

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 17 September 2026.#I.G.V. v Vueling Airlines SA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Carriage of passengers and their baggage by air – Regulation (EC) No 2027/97 – Article 1 – Article 3(1) – Carriage by air within a single Member State – Montreal Convention – Article 33(1) – Court having jurisdiction – Place where the carrier has a place of business through which the contract has been entered into – Contract of carriage entered into online – Loss of baggage.#Case C-876/24.

    judgment · PT · 17 September 2026

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 17 September 2026.#I.G.V. v Vueling Airlines SA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Carriage of passengers and their baggage by air – Regulation (EC) No 2027/97 – Article 1 – Article 3(1) – Carriage by air within a single Member State – Montreal Convention – Article 33(1) – Court having jurisdiction – Place where the carrier has a place of business through which the contract has been entered into – Contract of carriage entered into online – Loss of baggage.#Case C-876/24.

    judgment · BG · 17 September 2026

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 17 September 2026.#I.G.V. v Vueling Airlines SA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Carriage of passengers and their baggage by air – Regulation (EC) No 2027/97 – Article 1 – Article 3(1) – Carriage by air within a single Member State – Montreal Convention – Article 33(1) – Court having jurisdiction – Place where the carrier has a place of business through which the contract has been entered into – Contract of carriage entered into online – Loss of baggage.#Case C-876/24.

    judgment · FI · 17 September 2026

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 17 September 2026.#I.G.V. v Vueling Airlines SA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Carriage of passengers and their baggage by air – Regulation (EC) No 2027/97 – Article 1 – Article 3(1) – Carriage by air within a single Member State – Montreal Convention – Article 33(1) – Court having jurisdiction – Place where the carrier has a place of business through which the contract has been entered into – Contract of carriage entered into online – Loss of baggage.#Case C-876/24.

    judgment · DA · 17 September 2026

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 17 September 2026.#I.G.V. v Vueling Airlines SA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Carriage of passengers and their baggage by air – Regulation (EC) No 2027/97 – Article 1 – Article 3(1) – Carriage by air within a single Member State – Montreal Convention – Article 33(1) – Court having jurisdiction – Place where the carrier has a place of business through which the contract has been entered into – Contract of carriage entered into online – Loss of baggage.#Case C-876/24.

    judgment · SL · 17 September 2026

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 17 September 2026.#I.G.V. v Vueling Airlines SA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Carriage of passengers and their baggage by air – Regulation (EC) No 2027/97 – Article 1 – Article 3(1) – Carriage by air within a single Member State – Montreal Convention – Article 33(1) – Court having jurisdiction – Place where the carrier has a place of business through which the contract has been entered into – Contract of carriage entered into online – Loss of baggage.#Case C-876/24.

    judgment · IT · 17 September 2026

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 17 September 2026.#I.G.V. v Vueling Airlines SA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Carriage of passengers and their baggage by air – Regulation (EC) No 2027/97 – Article 1 – Article 3(1) – Carriage by air within a single Member State – Montreal Convention – Article 33(1) – Court having jurisdiction – Place where the carrier has a place of business through which the contract has been entered into – Contract of carriage entered into online – Loss of baggage.#Case C-876/24.

    judgment · ES · 17 September 2026

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 17 September 2026.#I.G.V. v Vueling Airlines SA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Carriage of passengers and their baggage by air – Regulation (EC) No 2027/97 – Article 1 – Article 3(1) – Carriage by air within a single Member State – Montreal Convention – Article 33(1) – Court having jurisdiction – Place where the carrier has a place of business through which the contract has been entered into – Contract of carriage entered into online – Loss of baggage.#Case C-876/24.

    judgment · FR · 17 September 2026

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.