PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

European Union · Record · CJ

CELEX 62024CJ0887_SUM

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 23 April 2026.#YH v Widl GmbH.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to machinery – Technical standards and regulations – Directive 98/37/EC – Machine fitted with normal and emergency stopping devices – Essential safety and health requirements – Risks to the safety and health of people – Unconscious or conscious triggering of one of the stopping devices – Blocking of the emergency stopping device – Appropriate maneuver capable of unlocking the emergency stopping device.#Case C-887/24.

decidedEuropean Union· Court of Justice of the European Union· FR

Introduced

23 April 2026

Last action

Status

decided

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

23 April 2026

Records

Official record CELEX 62024CJ0887_SUM from European Union at Court of Justice of the European Union. Dated 23 April 2026. Status: decided.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

  • Arrêt de la Cour (neuvième chambre) du 23 avril 2026.#YH contre Widl GmbH.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Rapprochement des législations des États membres relatives aux machines – Normes et réglementations techniques – Directive 98/37/CE – Machine munie de dispositifs d’arrêt normal et d’urgence – Exigences essentielles de sécurité et de santé – Risques pour la sécurité et la santé des personnes – Déclenchement inconscient ou conscient de l’un des dispositifs d’arrêt – Blocage du dispositif d’arrêt d’urgence – Manœuvre appropriée pouvant débloquer le dispositif d’arrêt d’urgence.#Affaire C-887/24.

    judgment · FR · 23 April 2026

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.