Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 2 September 2026.#Opera Norway AS v European Commission.#Digital services — Regulation (EU) 2022/1925 — Designation of a gatekeeper — Web browser — Article 3(2) and (5) of Regulation 2022/1925 — Important gateway for professional users to reach their end users — Presumption — Article 17(3) of Regulation 2022/1925 — Investigation market for the purpose of appointing gatekeepers — Action for annulment — Individual allocation — Admissibility — Duty to state reasons — Error of law — Error of assessment — Principle of good administration.#Case T-357/24.

Official titles

Authentic titles published by the source. The stored canonical title is not replaced.

Records

Official record CELEX 62024TJ0357_RES from European Union at Court of Justice of the European Union. Dated 2 September 2026. Status: decided.

Timeline

1. 2 September 2026

   Decided

   Source: work_date_document

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

2 official files

• Arrêt du Tribunal (huitième chambre élargie) du 2 septembre 2026.#Opera Norway AS contre Commission européenne.#Services numériques – Règlement (UE) 2022/1925 – Désignation d’un contrôleur d’accès – Navigateur Internet – Article 3, paragraphes 2 et 5, du règlement 2022/1925 – Point d’accès majeur permettant aux entreprises utilisatrices d’atteindre leurs utilisateurs finaux – Présomption – Article 17, paragraphe 3, du règlement 2022/1925 – Enquête de marché pour la désignation des contrôleurs d’accès – Recours en annulation – Affectation individuelle – Recevabilité – Obligation de motivation – Erreur de droit – Erreur d’appréciation – Principe de bonne administration.#Affaire T-357/24.

  judgment · FR · 2 September 2026

  ViewDownloadOpen at official source

• Acórdão do Tribunal Geral (Oitava Secção alargada) de 2 de setembro de 2026.#Opera Norway AS contra Comissão Europeia.#Serviços digitais — Regulamento (UE) 2022/1925 — Designação de um controlador de acesso — Navegador Web — Artigo 3.°, n.os 2 e 5, do Regulamento 2022/1925 — Porta de acesso importante para os utilizadores profissionais chegarem aos seus utilizadores finais — Presunção — Artigo 17.°, n.° 3, do Regulamento 2022/1925 — Investigação de mercado para fins de designação de controladores de acesso — Recurso de anulação — Afetação individual — Admissibilidade — Dever de fundamentação — Erro de direito — Erro de apreciação — Princípio da boa administração.#Processo T-357/24.

  judgment · PT · 2 September 2026

  ViewDownloadOpen at official source

Sponsors

• · GCEU · General Court

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.