Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 4 March 2026.#Opticoelectron Group AD v European Border and Coast Guard Agency.#Public supply contracts – Tender procedure – Supply of surveillance equipment to Frontex – Rejection of a tenderer’s offer – Action for annulment – Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure – Interest in bringing proceedings – Admissibility – Violation of the minimum technical requirements of the award procedure – Equal treatment – ​​Transparency – Principle of good administration.#Case T-669/24.

Records

Official record CELEX 62024TJ0669_INF from European Union at Court of Justice of the European Union. Dated 4 March 2026. Status: decided.

Timeline

1. 4 March 2026

   Decided

   Source: Work_date_document

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

• Arrêt du Tribunal (dixième chambre) du 4 mars 2026.#Opticoelectron Group AD contre Agence européenne de garde-frontières et de garde-côtes.#Marchés publics de fournitures – Procédure d’appel d’offres – Fourniture d’équipements de surveillance à Frontex – Rejet de l’offre d’un soumissionnaire – Recours en annulation – Article 76, sous d), du règlement de procédure – Intérêt à agir – Recevabilité – Violation des exigences techniques minimales de la procédure d’attribution – Égalité de traitement – Transparence – Principe de bonne administration.#Affaire T-669/24.

  judgment · FR · 4 March 2026

  ViewDownloadOpen at official source

Sponsors

• · GCEU · General Court

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.