European Union · Record · CJ
CELEX 62025CJ0132
Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 23 April 2026.#M.M. Ristorazione Srl v Villa Ramazzini Srl.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Intellectual property – Directive 2004/48/EC – Enforcement of intellectual property rights – Article 9(5) – Provisional measures – Failure to institute proceedings leading to a decision on the merits of the case – National legislation providing for the continuation of the effects of provisional measures intended to anticipate the effects of a decision on the merits of the case.#Case C-132/25.
Introduced
23 April 2026
Last action
23 April 2026 · Decided
Status
decided
Sponsors
—
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
23 April 2026
Records
Official record CELEX 62025CJ0132 from European Union at Court of Justice of the European Union. Dated 23 April 2026. Status: decided.
Timeline
23 April 2026
Decided
Source: work_date_document
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
24 official files
Sodba Sodišča (osmi senat) z dne 23. aprila 2026.#M. M. Ristorazione Srl proti Villa Ramazzini Srl.#Predhodno odločanje – Intelektualna lastnina – Direktiva 2004/48/ES – Spoštovanje pravic intelektualne lastnine – Člen 9(5) – Začasni ukrepi – Nevložitev tožbe, ki bi pripeljala do meritorne odločbe – Nacionalna ureditev, ki določa ohranitev učinkov začasnih ukrepov, ki naj bi predvidevali učinke meritorne odločbe.#Zadeva C-132/25.
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Sodba Sodišča (osmi senat) z dne 23. aprila 2026.#M. M. Ristorazione Srl proti Villa Ramazzini Srl.#Predhodno odločanje – Intelektualna lastnina – Direktiva 2004/48/ES – Spoštovanje pravic intelektualne lastnine – Člen 9(5) – Začasni ukrepi – Nevložitev tožbe, ki bi pripeljala do meritorne odločbe – Nacionalna ureditev, ki določa ohranitev učinkov začasnih ukrepov, ki naj bi predvidevali učinke meritorne odločbe.#Zadeva C-132/25.
judgment · SL · 23 April 2026
Unionin tuomioistuimen tuomio (kahdeksas jaosto) 23.4.2026.#M.M. Ristorazione Srl vastaan Villa Ramazzini Srl.#Corte suprema di cassazionen esittämä ennakkoratkaisupyyntö.#Ennakkoratkaisupyyntö – Immateriaalioikeudet – Direktiivi 2004/48/EY – Teollis- ja tekijänoikeuksien noudattamisen varmistaminen – 9 artiklan 5 kohta – Väliaikaiset toimenpiteet – Tilanne, jossa pääasiaa koskevaa menettelyä ei ole pantu vireille – Kansallinen säännöstö, jossa säädetään sellaisten väliaikaisten toimenpiteiden voimassa pitämisestä, joilla voidaan ennakoida pääasiaa koskevan ratkaisun vaikutuksia.#Asia C-132/25.
judgment · FI · 23 April 2026
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Domstolens dom (Ottende Afdeling) af 23. april 2026.#M.M. Ristorazione Srl mod Villa Ramazzini Srl.#Præjudiciel forelæggelse – intellektuel ejendomsret – direktiv 2004/48/EF – håndhævelse af intellektuelle ejendomsrettigheder – artikel 9, stk. 5 – foreløbige foranstaltninger – manglende anlæggelse af en sag vedrørende realiteten – national lovgivning om opretholdelse af virkningerne af foreløbige foranstaltninger, der kan foregribe virkningerne af en afgørelse vedrørende realiteten.#Sag C-132/25.
judgment · DA · 23 April 2026
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Решение на Съда (осми състав) от 23 април 2026 г.#M.M. Ristorazione Srl срещу Villa Ramazzini Srl.#Преюдициално запитване, отправено от Corte suprema di cassazione.#Преюдициално запитване — Интелектуална собственост — Директива 2004/48/ЕО — Упражняване на права върху интелектуалната собственост — Член 9, параграф 5 — Временни мерки — Непредявяване на иск, водещ до решение по същество — Национална правна уредба, предвиждаща запазване на действието на временни мерки, които изпреварват последиците от решението по същество.#Дело C-132/25.
judgment · BG · 23 April 2026
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Urteil des Gerichtshofs (Achte Kammer) vom 23. April 2026.#M.M. Ristorazione Srl gegen Villa Ramazzini Srl.#Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung – Geistiges Eigentum – Richtlinie 2004/48/EG – Durchsetzung der Rechte des geistigen Eigentums – Art. 9 Abs. 5 – Einstweilige Maßnahmen – Keine Einleitung eines Verfahrens, das zu einer Sachentscheidung führt – Nationale Rechtsvorschrift, nach der einstweilige Maßnahmen, mit denen die Wirkungen einer Sachentscheidung vorweggenommen werden, erhalten bleiben.#Rechtssache C-132/25.
judgment · DE · 23 April 2026
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Domstolens dom (åttonde avdelningen) av den 23 april 2026.#M.M. Ristorazione Srl mot Villa Ramazzini Srl.#Begäran om förhandsavgörande från Corte suprema di cassazione.#Begäran om förhandsavgörande – Immateriella rättigheter – Direktiv 2004/48/EG – Skydd för immateriella rättigheter – Artikel 9.5 – Interimistiska åtgärder – Talan om saken har inte väckts – Nationell lagstiftning i vilken det föreskrivs att verkningarna av interimistiska åtgärder som kan föregripa verkningarna av ett avgörande i sak ska bibehållas.#Mål C-132/25.
judgment · SV · 23 April 2026
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Euroopa Kohtu otsus (kaheksas koda), 23.4.2026.#M.M. Ristorazione Srl versus Villa Ramazzini Srl.#Eelotsusetaotlus – Intellektuaalomand – Direktiiv 2004/48/EÜ – Intellektuaalomandi õiguste jõustamine – Artikli 9 lõige 5 – Ajutised meetmed – Põhikohtuotsuseni viiva menetluse algatamiseks hagi esitamata jätmine – Riigisisesed õigusnormid, mis näevad ette selliste ajutiste meetmete mõju säilitamise, mille eesmärk on ennetada põhikohtuotsuse tagajärgi.#Kohtuasi C-132/25.
judgment · ET · 23 April 2026
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Presuda Suda (osmo vijeće) 23. travnja 2026.#M.M. Ristorazione Srl protiv Villa Ramazzini Srl.#Zahtjev za prethodnu odluku – Intelektualno vlasništvo – Direktiva 2004/48/EZ – Provedba prava intelektualnog vlasništva – Članak 9. stavak 5. – Privremene mjere – Nepokretanje postupka koji dovodi do odluke o meritumu – Nacionalni propis koji predviđa održavanje na snazi učinaka privremenih mjera kojima se nastoje predvidjeti učinci odluke o meritumu.#Predmet C-132/25.
judgment · HR · 23 April 2026
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Απόφαση του Δικαστηρίου (όγδοο τμήμα) της 23ης Απριλίου 2026.#M.M. Ristorazione Srl κατά Villa Ramazzini Srl.#Προδικαστική παραπομπή – Διανοητική ιδιοκτησία – Οδηγία 2004/48/ΕΚ – Επιβολή των δικαιωμάτων διανοητικής ιδιοκτησίας – Άρθρο 9, παράγραφος 5 – Προσωρινά μέτρα – Μη κίνηση διαδικασίας επί της ουσίας – Εθνική ρύθμιση δυνάμει της οποίας διατηρούνται σε ισχύ τα αποτελέσματα προσωρινών μέτρων που μπορούν να επισπεύσουν τα αποτελέσματα μιας απόφασης επί της ουσίας.#Υπόθεση C-132/25.
judgment · EL · 23 April 2026
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Sentencia del Tribunal de Justicia (Sala Octava) de 23 de abril de 2026.#M.M. Ristorazione Srl contra Villa Ramazzini Srl.#Petición de decisión prejudicial planteada por la Corte suprema di cassazione.#Procedimiento prejudicial — Propiedad intelectual — Directiva 2004/48/CE — Respeto de los derechos de propiedad intelectual — Artículo 9, apartado 5 — Medidas provisionales — No interposición de una acción sobre el fondo — Normativa nacional que establece el mantenimiento de los efectos de las medidas cautelares que pueden anticipar los efectos de una resolución sobre el fondo.#Asunto C-132/25.
judgment · ES · 23 April 2026
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
A Bíróság ítélete (nyolcadik tanács), 2026. április 23.#M.M. Ristorazione Srl kontra Villa Ramazzini Srl.#A Corte suprema di cassazione által benyújtott előzetes döntéshozatal iránti kérelem.#Előzetes döntéshozatal – Szellemi tulajdon – 2004/48/EK irányelv – A szellemitulajdon‑jogok érvényesítése – A 9. cikk (5) bekezdése – Ideiglenes intézkedések – Az érdemi határozathoz vezető eljárás megindításának hiánya – Az érdemi határozat joghatásait megelőlegező ideiglenes intézkedések hatályának fenntartását előíró nemzeti szabályozás.#C-132/25. sz. ügy.
judgment · HU · 23 April 2026
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
2026 m. balandžio 23 d. Teisingumo Teismo (aštuntoji kolegija) sprendimas.#M.M. Ristorazione Srl prieš Villa Ramazzini Srl.#Prašymas priimti prejudicinį sprendimą – Intelektinė nuosavybė – Direktyva 2004/48/EB – Intelektinės nuosavybės teisių gynimas – 9 straipsnio 5 dalis – Laikinosios priemonės – Proceso dėl bylos esmės nepradėjimas – Nacionalinės teisės nuostatos, numatančios laikinųjų priemonių, kuriomis siekiama iš anksto numatyti sprendimo dėl bylos esmės baigtį, palikimą galioti.#Byla C-132/25.
judgment · LT · 23 April 2026
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Tiesas spriedums (astotā palāta), 2026. gada 23. aprīlis.#M.M. Ristorazione Srl pret Villa Ramazzini Srl.#Lūgums sniegt prejudiciālu nolēmumu – Intelektuālais īpašums – Direktīva 2004/48/EK – Intelektuālā īpašuma tiesību piemērošana – 9. panta 5. punkts – Pagaidu pasākumi – Tiesvedības neuzsākšana attiecīgās lietas sakarā – Valsts tiesiskais regulējums, kurā paredzēts atstāt spēkā pagaidu pasākumus, kas ļauj prognozēt par lietas būtību pieņemamā nolēmuma sekas.#Lieta C-132/25.
judgment · LV · 23 April 2026
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Sentenza tal-Qorti tal-Ġustizzja (It-Tmien Awla) tat-23 ta’ April 2026.#M.M. Ristorazione Srl vs Villa Ramazzini Srl.#Rinviju għal deċiżjoni preliminari – Proprjetà intellettwali – Direttiva 2004/48/KE – Rispett tad-drittijiet tal-proprjetà intellettwali – Artikolu 9(5) – Miżuri provviżorji – Assenza li jingħata bidu għal azzjoni li twassal għal deċiżjoni fil-mertu – Leġiżlazzjoni nazzjonali li tipprevedi ż-żamma tal-effetti ta’ miżuri provviżorji maħsuba sabiex jantiċipaw l-effetti ta’ deċiżjoni fil-mertu.#Kawża C-132/25.
judgment · MT · 23 April 2026
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Rozsudek Soudního dvora (osmého senátu) ze dne 23. dubna 2026.#M.M. Ristorazione Srl v. Villa Ramazzini Srl.#Řízení o předběžné otázce – Duševní vlastnictví – Směrnice 2004/48/ES – Dodržování práv duševního vlastnictví – Článek 9 odst. 5 – Předběžná opatření – Nezahájení řízení vedoucího k rozhodnutí ve věci samé – Vnitrostátní právní úprava, která stanoví zachování účinků předběžných opatření, jež mají předjímat účinky rozhodnutí ve věci samé.#Věc C-132/25.
judgment · CS · 23 April 2026
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Arrest van het Hof (Achtste kamer) van 23 april 2026.#M.M. Ristorazione Srl tegen Villa Ramazzini Srl.#Prejudiciële verwijzing – Intellectuele eigendom – Richtlijn 2004/48/EG – Handhaving van intellectuele-eigendomsrechten – Artikel 9, lid 5 – Voorlopige maatregelen – Geen procedure ingesteld die leidt tot een beslissing ten principale – Nationale regeling waarbij de gevolgen worden gehandhaafd van voorlopige maatregelen die vooruitlopen op de gevolgen van een beslissing ten principale.#Zaak C-132/25.
judgment · NL · 23 April 2026
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Wyrok Trybunału (ósma izba) z dnia 23 kwietnia 2026 r.#M.M. Ristorazione Srl przeciwko Villa Ramazzini Srl.#Wniosek o wydanie orzeczenia w trybie prejudycjalnym złożony przez Corte suprema di cassazione.#Odesłanie prejudycjalne – Własność intelektualna – Dyrektywa 2004/48/WE – Egzekwowanie praw własności intelektualnej – Artykuł 9 ust. 5 – Środki tymczasowe – Brak wszczęcia procedury prowadzącej do decyzji merytorycznej – Uregulowania krajowe przewidujące utrzymanie skutków środków tymczasowych mających uprzedzać skutki orzeczenia co do istoty sprawy.#Sprawa C-132/25.
judgment · PL · 23 April 2026
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Hotărârea Curții (Camera a opta) din 23 aprilie 2026.#M.M. Ristorazione Srl împotriva Villa Ramazzini Srl.#Trimitere preliminară – Proprietate intelectuală – Directiva 2004/48/CE – Respectarea drepturilor de proprietate intelectuală – Articolul 9 alineatul (5) – Măsuri provizorii – Lipsa inițierii unei acțiuni care să conducă la o decizie pe fond – Reglementare națională care prevede menținerea efectelor unor măsuri provizorii prin care se urmărește anticiparea efectelor unei decizii pe fond.#Cauza C-132/25.
judgment · RO · 23 April 2026
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Rozsudok Súdneho dvora (ôsma komora) z 23. apríla 2026.#M.M. Ristorazione Srl proti Villa Ramazzini Srl.#Návrh na začatie prejudiciálneho konania – Duševné vlastníctvo – Smernica 2004/48/ES – Vymožiteľnosť práv duševného vlastníctva – Článok 9 ods. 5 – Predbežné opatrenia – Neprijatie návrhu na začatie konania vedúceho k rozhodnutiu vo veci samej – Vnútroštátna právna úprava stanovujúca zachovanie účinkov predbežných opatrení, ktoré môžu predvídať účinky rozhodnutia vo veci samej.#Vec C-132/25.
judgment · SK · 23 April 2026
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Acórdão do Tribunal de Justiça (Oitava Secção) de 23 de abril de 2026.#M.M. Ristorazione Srl contra Villa Ramazzini Srl.#Pedido de decisão prejudicial apresentada por Corte suprema di cassazione.#Reenvio prejudicial — Propriedade intelectual — Diretiva 2004/48/CE — Respeito dos direitos de propriedade intelectual — Artigo 9.o, n.o 5 — Medidas provisórias — Não instauração da ação relativa ao mérito — Legislação nacional que prevê a manutenção dos efeitos de medidas provisórias destinadas a antecipar os efeitos de uma decisão relativa ao mérito.#Processo C-132/25.
judgment · PT · 23 April 2026
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Arrêt de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 23 avril 2026.#M.M. Ristorazione Srl contre Villa Ramazzini Srl.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Propriété intellectuelle – Directive 2004/48/CE – Respect des droits de propriété intellectuelle – Article 9, paragraphe 5 – Mesures provisoires – Absence d’engagement d’une action conduisant à une décision au fond – Réglementation nationale prévoyant le maintien des effets de mesures provisoires tendant à anticiper les effets d’une décision au fond.#Affaire C-132/25.
judgment · FR · 23 April 2026
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Sentenza della Corte (Ottava Sezione) del 23 aprile 2026.#M.M. Ristorazione Srl contro Villa Ramazzini Srl.#Rinvio pregiudiziale – Proprietà intellettuale – Direttiva 2004/48/CE – Rispetto dei diritti di proprietà intellettuale – Articolo 9, paragrafo 5 – Misure provvisorie – Assenza di esercizio di un’azione di merito – Normativa nazionale che prevede il mantenimento degli effetti dei provvedimenti cautelari idonei ad anticipare gli effetti della sentenza di merito.#Causa C-132/25.
judgment · IT · 23 April 2026
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Breithiúnas na Cúirte (An tOchtú Dlísheomra) 2026 Aibreán 23.#M.M. Ristorazione Srl v Villa Ramazzini Srl.#Tarchur chun réamhrialú – Maoin intleachtúil – Treoir 2004/48/CE – Cearta maoine intleachtúla a fhorfheidhmiú – Airteagal 9(5) – Bearta sealadacha – Mainneachtain imeachtaí a thionscnamh as a n‑eascraíonn cinneadh ar shubstaint an cháis – Reachtaíocht náisiúnta lena bhforáiltear do leanúint i bhfeidhm éifeachtaí de bhearta sealadacha atá ceaptha chun éifeachtaí cinneadh ar shubstaint an cháis a thuar.#Cás C-132/25.
judgment · GA · 23 April 2026
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 23 April 2026.#M.M. Ristorazione Srl v Villa Ramazzini Srl.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Intellectual property – Directive 2004/48/EC – Enforcement of intellectual property rights – Article 9(5) – Provisional measures – Failure to institute proceedings leading to a decision on the merits of the case – National legislation providing for the continuation of the effects of provisional measures intended to anticipate the effects of a decision on the merits of the case.#Case C-132/25.
judgment · EN · 23 April 2026
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Leesvertaling
Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.
Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.
Sponsors
- · CJ · Court of Justice of the European Union
- · fc7a5e9f-5469-11ec-91ac-01aa75ed71a1 · fc7a5e9f-5469-11ec-91ac-01aa75ed71a1
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.
- Official source: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:62025CJ0132
- Open data entity: http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/d482349d-3eed-11f1-814f-01aa75ed71a1
- eurlex · 62025CJ0132 · source updated 23 April 2026