Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

European Union · Record · CO

CELEX 62025CO0220

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 9 December 2025.#ER v Miskolci Törvényszék.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Pécsi Törvényszék.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94(b) and (c) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Requirement to set out the legal context of the dispute in the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need for a reply to the questions referred – Lack of sufficient details – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-220/25.

decidedEuropean Union· Court of Justice of the European Union· EN

Introduced

9 December 2025

Last action

9 December 2025 · Decided

Status

decided

Sponsors

—

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

9 December 2025

Official sourceDownload fileView documentsShare

Records

Official record CELEX 62025CO0220 from European Union at Court of Justice of the European Union. Dated 9 December 2025. Status: decided.

Timeline

  1. 9 December 2025

    Decided

    Source: work_date_document

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

23 official files

A Bíróság végzése (kilencedik tanács), 2025. december 9.#ER kontra Miskolci Törvényszék.#A Pécsi Törvényszék (Magyarország) által benyújtott Előzetes döntéshozatal iránti kérelem.#Előzetes döntéshozatal – A Bíróság eljárási szabályzata 53. cikkének (2) bekezdése, valamint 94. cikkének b) és c) pontja – Az alapeljárásbeli jogvita jogszabályi hátterének bemutatására, valamint az előzetes döntéshozatalra előterjesztett kérdésekre adandó válasz szükségességét igazoló okok kifejtésére vonatkozó követelmény – Kellően részletes ismertetés hiánya – Nyilvánvaló elfogadhatatlanság.#C-220/25. sz. ügy.

View fileDownload file

Reading translation

Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

  • A Bíróság végzése (kilencedik tanács), 2025. december 9.#ER kontra Miskolci Törvényszék.#A Pécsi Törvényszék (Magyarország) által benyújtott Előzetes döntéshozatal iránti kérelem.#Előzetes döntéshozatal – A Bíróság eljárási szabályzata 53. cikkének (2) bekezdése, valamint 94. cikkének b) és c) pontja – Az alapeljárásbeli jogvita jogszabályi hátterének bemutatására, valamint az előzetes döntéshozatalra előterjesztett kérdésekre adandó válasz szükségességét igazoló okok kifejtésére vonatkozó követelmény – Kellően részletes ismertetés hiánya – Nyilvánvaló elfogadhatatlanság.#C-220/25. sz. ügy.

    judgment · HU · 9 December 2025

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Ordonnance de la Cour (neuvième chambre) du 9 décembre 2025.#ER contre Miskolci Törvényszék.#Demande de décision préjudicielle, introduite par la Pécsi Törvényszék.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 53, paragraphe 2, et article 94, sous b) et c), du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Exigence de présentation du contexte réglementaire du litige au principal ainsi que des raisons justifiant la nécessité d’une réponse aux questions préjudicielles – Absence de précisions suffisantes – Irrecevabilité manifeste.#Affaire C-220/25.

    judgment · FR · 9 December 2025

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Reading translation

    Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

    On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

  • Domstolens beslut (nionde avdelningen) av den 9 december 2025.#ER mot Miskolci Törvényszék.#Begäran om förhandsavgörande från Pécsi Törvényszék.#Mål C-220/25.

    judgment · SV · 9 December 2025

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Reading translation

    Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

    On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

  • Sklep Sodišča (deveti senat) z dne 9. decembra 2025.#ER proti Miskolci Törvényszék.#Predlog za sprejetje predhodne odločbe, ki ga je vložilo Pécsi Törvényszék.#Zadeva C-220/25.

    judgment · SL · 9 December 2025

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Reading translation

    Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

    On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

  • Uznesenie Súdneho dvora (deviata komora) z 9. decembra 2025.#ER proti Miskolci Törvényszék.#Návrh na začatie prejudiciálneho konania, ktorý podal Pécsi Törvényszék.#Vec C-220/25.

    judgment · SK · 9 December 2025

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Reading translation

    Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

    On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

  • Ordonanța Curții (Camera a noua) din 9 decembrie 2025.#ER împotriva Miskolci Törvényszék.#Cererea de decizie preliminară formulată de Pécsi Törvényszék.#Cauza C-220/25.

    judgment · RO · 9 December 2025

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Reading translation

    Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

    On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

  • Despacho do Tribunal de Justiça (Nona Secção) de 9 de dezembro de 2025.#ER contra Miskolci Törvényszék.#Pedido de decisão prejudicial apresentado pelo Pécsi Törvényszék.#Reenvio prejudicial – Artigo 53.°, n.° 2, e artigo 94.°, alíneas b) e c), do Regulamento de Processo do Tribunal de Justiça – Exigência de apresentação do contexto regulamentar do litígio no processo principal e das razões que justificam a necessidade de uma resposta às questões prejudiciais – Falta de precisões suficientes – Inadmissibilidade manifesta.#Processo C-220/25.

    judgment · PT · 9 December 2025

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Reading translation

    Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

    On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

  • Postanowienie Trybunału (dziewiąta izba) z dnia 9 grudnia 2025 r.#ER przeciwko Miskolci Törvényszék.#Wniosek o wydanie orzeczenia w trybie prejudycjalnym złożony przez Pécsi Törvényszék.#Sprawa C-220/25.

    judgment · PL · 9 December 2025

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Reading translation

    Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

    On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

  • Beschikking van het Hof (Negende kamer) van 9 december 2025.#ER tegen Miskolci Törvényszék.#Verzoek van de Pécsi Törvényszék om een prejudiciële beslissing.#Prejudiciële verwijzing – Artikel 53, lid 2, en artikel 94, onder b) en c), van het Reglement voor de procesvoering van het Hof – Vereiste om de juridische context van het hoofdgeding uiteen te zetten en om de redenen te vermelden waarom een antwoord op de prejudiciële vragen noodzakelijk is – Onvoldoende preciseringen – Kennelijke niet-ontvankelijkheid.#Zaak C-220/25.

    judgment · NL · 9 December 2025

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Reading translation

    Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

    On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

  • Digriet tal-Qorti tal-Ġustizzja (Id-Disa’ Awla) tad-9 ta’ Diċembru 2025.#ER vs Miskolci Törvényszék.#Talba għal deċiżjoni preliminari, imressqa mill-Pécsi Törvényszék.#Kawża C-220/25.

    judgment · MT · 9 December 2025

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Reading translation

    Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

    On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

  • Tiesas (devītā palāta) rīkojums, 2025. gada 9. decembris.#ER pret Miskolci Törvényszék.#Pécsi Törvényszék lūgums sniegt prejudiciālu nolēmumu.#Lieta C-220/25.

    judgment · LV · 9 December 2025

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Reading translation

    Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

    On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

  • 2025 m. gruodžio 9 d. Teisingumo Teismo (devintoji kolegija) nutartis.#ER prieš Miskolci Törvényszék.#Pécsi Törvényszék prašymas priimti prejudicinį sprendimą.#Byla C-220/25.

    judgment · LT · 9 December 2025

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Reading translation

    Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

    On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

  • Ordinanza della Corte (Nona Sezione) del 9 dicembre 2025.#ER contro Miskolci Törvényszék.#Domanda di pronuncia pregiudiziale proposta da Pécsi Törvényszék.#Domanda di pronuncia pregiudiziale – Articolo 53, paragrafo 2, e articolo 94, lettere b) e c), del regolamento di procedura della Corte – Requisito relativo alla presentazione del contesto normativo del procedimento principale nonché dei motivi che giustificano la necessità di una risposta alle questioni pregiudiziali – Insussistenza di sufficienti precisazioni – Irricevibilità manifesta.#Causa C-220/25.

    judgment · IT · 9 December 2025

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Reading translation

    Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

    On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

  • Rješenje Suda (deveto vijeće) od 9. prosinca 2025.#ER protiv Miskolci Törvényszék.#Zahtjev za prethodnu odluku koji je uputio Pécsi Törvényszék.#Predmet C-220/25.

    judgment · HR · 9 December 2025

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Reading translation

    Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

    On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

  • Unionin tuomioistuimen määräys (yhdeksäs jaosto) 9.12.2025.#ER vastaan Miskolci Törvényszék.#Pécsi Törvényszékin esittämä ennakkoratkaisupyyntö.#Asia C-220/25.

    judgment · FI · 9 December 2025

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Reading translation

    Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

    On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

  • Euroopa Kohtu määrus (üheksas koda), 9.12.2025.#ER versus Miskolci Törvényszék.#Eelotsusetaotlus, mille on esitanud Pécsi Törvényszék.#Eelotsusetaotlus – Euroopa Kohtu kodukorra artikli 53 lõige 2 ja artikli 94 punktid b ja c – Nõue esitada andmed põhikohtuasja õigusliku tausta kohta ja põhjused, mille tõttu on tarvis vastust eelotsuse küsimustele – Piisavate täpsustuste puudumine – Ilmselge vastuvõetamatus.#Kohtuasi C-220/25.

    judgment · ET · 9 December 2025

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Reading translation

    Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

    On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

  • Auto del Tribunal de Justicia (Sala Novena) de 9 de diciembre de 2025.#ER contra Miskolci Törvényszék.#Petición de decisión prejudicial planteada por el Pécsi Törvényszék.#Procedimiento prejudicial — Artículos 53, apartado 2, y 94, letras b) y c), del Reglamento de Procedimiento del Tribunal de Justicia — Exigencia de presentación del contexto normativo del litigio principal y de las razones que justifican la necesidad de una respuesta a las cuestiones prejudiciales — Falta de precisiones suficientes — Inadmisibilidad manifiesta.#Asunto C-220/25.

    judgment · ES · 9 December 2025

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Reading translation

    Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

    On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

  • Διάταξη του Δικαστηρίου (ένατο τμήμα) της 9ης Δεκεμβρίου 2025.#ER κατά Miskolci Törvényszék.#Αίτηση του Pécsi Törvényszék για την έκδοση προδικαστικής αποφάσεως.#Υπόθεση C-220/25.

    judgment · EL · 9 December 2025

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Reading translation

    Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

    On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

  • Beschluss des Gerichtshofs (Neunte Kammer) vom 9. Dezember 2025.#ER gegen Miskolci Törvényszék.#Vorabentscheidungsersuchen des Pécsi Törvényszék.#Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung – Art. 53 Abs. 2 und Art. 94 Buchst. b und c der Verfahrensordnung des Gerichtshofs – Erfordernis, Angaben zum rechtlichen Kontext des Ausgangsverfahrens sowie zu den Gründen zu machen, aus denen sich die Notwendigkeit einer Antwort auf die Vorlagefragen ergibt – Keine hinreichenden Angaben – Offensichtliche Unzulässigkeit.#Rechtssache C-220/25.

    judgment · DE · 9 December 2025

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Reading translation

    Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

    On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

  • Domstolens kendelse (Niende Afdeling) af 9. december 2025.#ER mod Miskolci Törvényszék.#Anmodning om præjudiciel afgørelse indgivet af Pécsi Törvényszék.#Præjudiciel forelæggelse – artikel 53, stk. 2, og artikel 94, litra b) og c), i Domstolens procesreglement – krav om angivelse af den lovgivningsmæssige sammenhæng for tvisten i hovedsagen samt af grundene til, at der er behov for besvarelse af de præjudicielle spørgsmål – utilstrækkelige præciseringer – åbenbart afvisningsgrundlag.#Sag C-220/25.

    judgment · DA · 9 December 2025

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Reading translation

    Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

    On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

  • Usnesení Soudního dvora (devátého senátu) ze dne 9. prosince 2025.#ER v. Miskolci Törvényszék.#Žádost o rozhodnutí o předběžné otázce, kterou podal Pécsi Törvényszék.#Řízení o předběžné otázce – Článek 53 odst. 2 a článek 94 jednacího řádu Soudního dvora – Požadavek uvedení právního rámce sporu v původním řízení, jakož i důvodů, které odůvodňují nezbytnost odpovědi na předběžné otázky – Nedostatečná upřesnění – Zjevná nepřípustnost.#Věc C-220/25.

    judgment · CS · 9 December 2025

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Reading translation

    Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

    On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

  • Определение на Съда (девети състав) от 9 декември 2025 г.#ER срещу Miskolci Törvényszék.#Преюдициално запитване, отправено от Pécsi Törvényszék.#Дело C-220/25.

    judgment · BG · 9 December 2025

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Reading translation

    Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

    On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

  • Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 9 December 2025.#ER v Miskolci Törvényszék.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Pécsi Törvényszék.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94(b) and (c) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Requirement to set out the legal context of the dispute in the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need for a reply to the questions referred – Lack of sufficient details – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-220/25.

    judgment · EN · 9 December 2025

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.