Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#“YETTEL BULGARIA” EAD v FB.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – Requirement to indicate the reasons justifying the need for a response by the Court as well as the link between the provisions of Union law whose interpretation is requested and the applicable national legislation – Absence details sufficient – ​​Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-502/25.

Records

Official record CELEX 62025CO0502_INF from European Union at Court of Justice of the European Union. Dated 18 December 2025. Status: decided.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

• Ordonnance de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 18 décembre 2025.#« YETTEL BULGARIA » EAD contre FB.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 53, paragraphe 2, et article 94 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Exigence d’indication des raisons justifiant la nécessité d’une réponse par la Cour ainsi que du lien entre les dispositions du droit de l’Union dont l’interprétation est demandée et la législation nationale applicable – Absence de précisions suffisantes – Irrecevabilité manifeste.#Affaire C-502/25.

  judgment · FR · 18 December 2025

  ViewDownloadOpen at official source

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.