European Union · Record · CO
CELEX 62025CO0642_INF
Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 16 March 2026.#Dragoș Ionuț Onescu v European Commission.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Lack of clarity and precision of the pleas – Appeal in part manifestly unfounded and in part manifestly inadmissible.#Case C-642/25 P.
Introduced
16 March 2026
Last action
—
Status
decided
Sponsors
—
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
16 March 2026
Records
Official record CELEX 62025CO0642_INF from European Union at Court of Justice of the European Union. Dated 16 March 2026. Status: decided.
Timeline
No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
2 official files
Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 16 March 2026.#Dragoș Ionuț Onescu v European Commission.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Lack of clarity and precision of the pleas – Appeal in part manifestly unfounded and in part manifestly inadmissible.#Case C-642/25 P.
Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 16 March 2026.#Dragoș Ionuț Onescu v European Commission.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Lack of clarity and precision of the pleas – Appeal in part manifestly unfounded and in part manifestly inadmissible.#Case C-642/25 P.
judgment · EN · 16 March 2026
Ordonnance de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 16 mars 2026.#Dragoș Ionuț Onescu contre Commission européenne.#Pourvoi – Article 181 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Défaut de clarté et de précision des moyens – Pourvoi en partie manifestement non fondé et en partie manifestement irrecevable.#Affaire C-642/25 P.
judgment · FR · 16 March 2026
Sponsors
No sponsors or actors listed by the source.
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.