PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

European Union · Record · CO

CELEX 62025CO0698

Order of the Court of Justice (Eighth Chamber) of 2 June 2026.#LG v Gesico Outsourcing Integral, S.L.#Preliminary ruling procedure — Article 53, paragraph 2, of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — European Social Charter — Amount of remuneration due for overtime work — Manifest incompetence of the Court of Justice. #Case C-698/25.

decidedEuropean Union· Court of Justice of the European Union· ES

Introduced

2 June 2026

Last action

Status

decided

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

2 June 2026

Records

Official record CELEX 62025CO0698 from European Union at Court of Justice of the European Union. Dated 2 June 2026. Status: decided.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

2 official files

  • Ordonnance de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 2 juin 2026.#LG contre Gesico Outsourcing Integral, S.L.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 53, paragraphe 2, du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Charte sociale européenne – Montant de la rémunération due au titre d’heures de travail supplémentaires – Incompétence manifeste de la Cour.#Affaire C-698/25.

    judgment · FR · 2 June 2026

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Auto del Tribunal de Justicia (Sala Octava) de 2 de junio de 2026.#LG contra Gesico Outsourcing Integral, S.L.#Procedimiento prejudicial — Artículo 53, apartado 2, del Reglamento de Procedimiento del Tribunal de Justicia — Carta Social Europea — Importe de la remuneración adeudada en concepto de horas de trabajo extraordinarias — Incompetencia manifiesta del Tribunal de Justicia.#Asunto C-698/25.

    judgment · ES · 2 June 2026

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.