Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 11 March 2026.#QI v European Commission.#Public service – Civil servants – Moral harassment – Article 12a of the Staff Regulations – Request for assistance – Article 24 of the Staff Regulations – Rejection of the request – New and substantial facts which may justify the presentation of a request for review of a previous decision – Initiation of proof of the alleged moral harassment – Responsibility.#Case T-6/25.

Records

Official record CELEX 62025TJ0006_INF from European Union at Court of Justice of the European Union. Dated 11 March 2026. Status: decided.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

• Arrêt du Tribunal (dixième chambre) du 11 mars 2026.#QI contre Commission européenne.#Fonction publique – Fonctionnaires – Harcèlement moral – Article 12 bis du statut – Demande d’assistance – Article 24 du statut – Rejet de la demande – Faits nouveaux et substantiels pouvant justifier la présentation d’une demande tendant au réexamen d’une décision antérieure – Commencement de preuve du harcèlement moral allégué – Responsabilité.#Affaire T-6/25.

  judgment · FR · 11 March 2026

  ViewDownloadOpen at official source

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.