European Union · Record · TJ
CELEX 62025TJ0007_INF
Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 11 March 2026.#Daniel Puppan v European Parliament.#Personnel case - officials - assessment - assessment year 2023 - assessment report - action for annulment - time limit - rejection - promotion - promotion year 2023 - award of points for merit - duty to state reasons - manifestly incorrect assessment - liability.#Case T-7/25.
Introduced
11 March 2026
Last action
—
Status
decided
Sponsors
—
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
11 March 2026
Records
Official record CELEX 62025TJ0007_INF from European Union at Court of Justice of the European Union. Dated 11 March 2026. Status: decided.
Timeline
No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
2 official files
Arrêt du Tribunal (troisième chambre) du 11 mars 2026.#Daniel Puppan contre Parlement européen.#Fonction publique – Fonctionnaires – Notation – Exercice de notation 2023 – Rapport de notation – Recours en annulation – Délai de recours – Irrecevabilité – Promotion – Exercice de promotion 2023 – Attribution de points de mérite – Obligation de motivation – Erreur manifeste d’appréciation – Responsabilité.#Affaire T-7/25.
Arrêt du Tribunal (troisième chambre) du 11 mars 2026.#Daniel Puppan contre Parlement européen.#Fonction publique – Fonctionnaires – Notation – Exercice de notation 2023 – Rapport de notation – Recours en annulation – Délai de recours – Irrecevabilité – Promotion – Exercice de promotion 2023 – Attribution de points de mérite – Obligation de motivation – Erreur manifeste d’appréciation – Responsabilité.#Affaire T-7/25.
judgment · FR · 11 March 2026
Rettens dom (Tredje Afdeling) af 11. marts 2026.#Daniel Puppan mod Europa-Parlamentet.#Personalesag – tjenestemænd – bedømmelse – bedømmelsesåret 2023 – bedømmelsesrapport – annullationssøgsmål – søgsmålsfrist – afvisning – forfremmelse – forfremmelsesåret 2023 – tildeling af point for fortjeneste – begrundelsespligt – åbenbart urigtigt skøn – ansvar.#Sag T-7/25.
judgment · DA · 11 March 2026
Sponsors
No sponsors or actors listed by the source.
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.