PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

European Union · Record · TJ

CELEX 62025TJ0376

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 2 September 2026.#Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU design – Invalidity proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Design representing a footwear sole – Prior EU designs – Grounds for invalidity – Individual character – Different overall impression – Degree of attention of an informed user – Degree of freedom of the designer – Article 25(1)(b) and Article 6(1) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 in the version prior to Regulation (EU) 2024/2822.#Case T-376/25.

decidedEuropean Union· Court of Justice of the European Union· EN

Introduced

2 September 2026

Last action

Status

decided

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

2 September 2026

Official titles

Authentic titles published by the source. The stored canonical title is not replaced.

1 official language
  • French

    Arrêt du Tribunal (septième chambre) du 2 septembre 2026.#Puma SE contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#Dessin ou modèle de l’Union européenne – Procédure de nullité – Enregistrement international désignant l’Union européenne – Dessin ou modèle représentant la semelle de chaussure – Dessins ou modèles de l’Union européenne antérieurs – Motif de nullité – Caractère individuel – Impression globale différente – Degré d’attention de l’utilisateur averti – Degré de liberté du créateur – Article 25, paragraphe 1, sous b), et article 6, paragraphe 1, du règlement (CE) no 6/2002 dans sa version antérieure au règlement (UE) 2024/2822.#Affaire T-376/25.

Records

Official record CELEX 62025TJ0376 from European Union at Court of Justice of the European Union. Dated 2 September 2026. Status: decided.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

2 official files

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 2 September 2026.#Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU design – Invalidity proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Design representing a footwear sole – Prior EU designs – Grounds for invalidity – Individual character – Different overall impression – Degree of attention of an informed user – Degree of freedom of the designer – Article 25(1)(b) and Article 6(1) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 in the version prior to Regulation (EU) 2024/2822.#Case T-376/25.

View fileDownload file

  • Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 2 September 2026.#Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU design – Invalidity proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Design representing a footwear sole – Prior EU designs – Grounds for invalidity – Individual character – Different overall impression – Degree of attention of an informed user – Degree of freedom of the designer – Article 25(1)(b) and Article 6(1) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 in the version prior to Regulation (EU) 2024/2822.#Case T-376/25.

    judgment · EN · 2 September 2026

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Arrêt du Tribunal (septième chambre) du 2 septembre 2026.#Puma SE contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#Dessin ou modèle de l’Union européenne – Procédure de nullité – Enregistrement international désignant l’Union européenne – Dessin ou modèle représentant la semelle de chaussure – Dessins ou modèles de l’Union européenne antérieurs – Motif de nullité – Caractère individuel – Impression globale différente – Degré d’attention de l’utilisateur averti – Degré de liberté du créateur – Article 25, paragraphe 1, sous b), et article 6, paragraphe 1, du règlement (CE) no 6/2002 dans sa version antérieure au règlement (UE) 2024/2822.#Affaire T-376/25.

    judgment · FR · 2 September 2026

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.