PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

European Union · Record · TJ

CELEX 62025TJ0635

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 2 September 2026.#Health Labs Care S.A. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark NPhealthLABS+ – Earlier national company name Health Labs – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Right to prohibit the use of a subsequent mark – Likelihood of confusion – Similarity of signs – Distinctiveness – Right to be heard – Article 94(1) and Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Rejection of the opposition.#Case T-635/25.

decidedEuropean Union· Court of Justice of the European Union· EN

Introduced

2 September 2026

Last action

Status

decided

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

2 September 2026

Records

Official record CELEX 62025TJ0635 from European Union at Court of Justice of the European Union. Dated 2 September 2026. Status: decided.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

  • Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 2 September 2026.#Health Labs Care S.A. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark NPhealthLABS+ – Earlier national company name Health Labs – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Right to prohibit the use of a subsequent mark – Likelihood of confusion – Similarity of signs – Distinctiveness – Right to be heard – Article 94(1) and Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Rejection of the opposition.#Case T-635/25.

    judgment · EN · 2 September 2026

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.