European Union · Record · QUESTION_WRITTEN_PRIORITY
P-8-2015-014482
Possible granting of market economy status to China
Introduced
5 November 2015
Last action
—
Status
QUESTION_WRITTEN_PRIORITY
Sponsors
—
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
5 November 2015
Official titles
Authentic titles published by the source. The stored canonical title is not replaced.
1 official language
English
Possible granting of market economy status to China
Records
Official record P-8-2015-014482 from European Union at European Parliament. Dated 5 November 2015. Status: QUESTION_WRITTEN_PRIORITY.
Timeline
No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
11 official files
Possible granting of market economy status to China
Possible granting of market economy status to China
QUESTION_WRITTEN_PRIORITY · EN · 8 June 2018
Possible granting of market economy status to China
QUESTION_WRITTEN_PRIORITY · EN · 8 June 2018
Possible granting of market economy status to China
QUESTION_WRITTEN_PRIORITY · EN · 8 June 2018
Possible granting of market economy status to China
QUESTION_WRITTEN_PRIORITY · EN · 8 June 2018
Possible granting of market economy status to China
QUESTION_WRITTEN_PRIORITY · EN · 8 June 2018
Answer
QUESTION_WRITTEN_ANSWER
Possible attribution du statut d'économie de marché à la Chine
QUESTION_WRITTEN_PRIORITY · FR · 8 June 2018
Possible attribution du statut d'économie de marché à la Chine
QUESTION_WRITTEN_PRIORITY · FR · 8 June 2018
Possible attribution du statut d'économie de marché à la Chine
QUESTION_WRITTEN_PRIORITY · FR · 8 June 2018
Possible attribution du statut d'économie de marché à la Chine
QUESTION_WRITTEN_PRIORITY · FR · 8 June 2018
Possible attribution du statut d'économie de marché à la Chine
QUESTION_WRITTEN_PRIORITY · FR · 8 June 2018
Sponsors
No sponsors or actors listed by the source.
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.