European Union · Record · QUESTION_WRITTEN_PRIORITY
P-8-2017-001140
State of play in development of the Mediterranean Corridor
Introduced
21 February 2017
Last action
—
Status
QUESTION_WRITTEN_PRIORITY
Sponsors
—
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
21 February 2017
Official titles
Authentic titles published by the source. The stored canonical title is not replaced.
1 official language
English
State of play in development of the Mediterranean Corridor
Records
Official record P-8-2017-001140 from European Union at European Parliament. Dated 21 February 2017. Status: QUESTION_WRITTEN_PRIORITY.
Timeline
No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
11 official files
State of play in development of the Mediterranean Corridor
State of play in development of the Mediterranean Corridor
QUESTION_WRITTEN_PRIORITY · EN · 7 June 2018
State of play in development of the Mediterranean Corridor
QUESTION_WRITTEN_PRIORITY · EN · 7 June 2018
State of play in development of the Mediterranean Corridor
QUESTION_WRITTEN_PRIORITY · EN · 7 June 2018
State of play in development of the Mediterranean Corridor
QUESTION_WRITTEN_PRIORITY · EN · 7 June 2018
State of play in development of the Mediterranean Corridor
QUESTION_WRITTEN_PRIORITY · EN · 7 June 2018
Answer
QUESTION_WRITTEN_ANSWER
Situación del desarrollo del Corredor Mediterráneo
QUESTION_WRITTEN_PRIORITY · ES · 7 June 2018
Situación del desarrollo del Corredor Mediterráneo
QUESTION_WRITTEN_PRIORITY · ES · 7 June 2018
Situación del desarrollo del Corredor Mediterráneo
QUESTION_WRITTEN_PRIORITY · ES · 7 June 2018
Situación del desarrollo del Corredor Mediterráneo
QUESTION_WRITTEN_PRIORITY · ES · 7 June 2018
Situación del desarrollo del Corredor Mediterráneo
QUESTION_WRITTEN_PRIORITY · ES · 7 June 2018
Sponsors
No sponsors or actors listed by the source.
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.