European Union · Record · QUESTION_WRITTEN_PRIORITY
P-8-2018-001694
Opinion 2/15 of 16 May 2017 of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) and its legal implications on both the agreements with Singapore and Japan and the Council's voting methods
Introduced
20 March 2018
Last action
—
Status
QUESTION_WRITTEN_PRIORITY
Sponsors
—
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
20 March 2018
Official titles
Authentic titles published by the source. The stored canonical title is not replaced.
1 official language
English
Opinion 2/15 of 16 May 2017 of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) and its legal implications on both the agreements with Singapore and Japan and the Council's voting methods
Records
Official record P-8-2018-001694 from European Union at European Parliament. Dated 20 March 2018. Status: QUESTION_WRITTEN_PRIORITY.
Timeline
No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
11 official files
Opinion 2/15 of 16 May 2017 of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) and its legal implications on both the agreements with Singapore and Japan and the Council's voting methods
Opinion 2/15 of 16 May 2017 of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) and its legal implications on both the agreements with Singapore and Japan and the Council's voting methods
QUESTION_WRITTEN_PRIORITY · EN · 26 March 2018
Opinion 2/15 of 16 May 2017 of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) and its legal implications on both the agreements with Singapore and Japan and the Council's voting methods
QUESTION_WRITTEN_PRIORITY · EN · 26 March 2018
Opinion 2/15 of 16 May 2017 of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) and its legal implications on both the agreements with Singapore and Japan and the Council's voting methods
QUESTION_WRITTEN_PRIORITY · EN · 26 March 2018
Opinion 2/15 of 16 May 2017 of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) and its legal implications on both the agreements with Singapore and Japan and the Council's voting methods
QUESTION_WRITTEN_PRIORITY · EN · 26 March 2018
Opinion 2/15 of 16 May 2017 of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) and its legal implications on both the agreements with Singapore and Japan and the Council's voting methods
QUESTION_WRITTEN_PRIORITY · EN · 26 March 2018
Answer
QUESTION_WRITTEN_ANSWER
Avis 2/15 rendu le 16 mai 2017 par la Cour de justice de l'Union européenne (CJUE) et ses implications juridiques tant sur l'accord avec Singapour et le Japon que sur les modalités de vote au sein du Conseil
QUESTION_WRITTEN_PRIORITY · FR · 26 March 2018
Avis 2/15 rendu le 16 mai 2017 par la Cour de justice de l'Union européenne (CJUE) et ses implications juridiques tant sur l'accord avec Singapour et le Japon que sur les modalités de vote au sein du Conseil
QUESTION_WRITTEN_PRIORITY · FR · 26 March 2018
Avis 2/15 rendu le 16 mai 2017 par la Cour de justice de l'Union européenne (CJUE) et ses implications juridiques tant sur l'accord avec Singapour et le Japon que sur les modalités de vote au sein du Conseil
QUESTION_WRITTEN_PRIORITY · FR · 26 March 2018
Avis 2/15 rendu le 16 mai 2017 par la Cour de justice de l'Union européenne (CJUE) et ses implications juridiques tant sur l'accord avec Singapour et le Japon que sur les modalités de vote au sein du Conseil
QUESTION_WRITTEN_PRIORITY · FR · 26 March 2018
Avis 2/15 rendu le 16 mai 2017 par la Cour de justice de l'Union européenne (CJUE) et ses implications juridiques tant sur l'accord avec Singapour et le Japon que sur les modalités de vote au sein du Conseil
QUESTION_WRITTEN_PRIORITY · FR · 26 March 2018
Sponsors
No sponsors or actors listed by the source.
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.