Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

European Union · Record · QUESTION_WRITTEN_PRIORITY

P-8-2018-001694

Avis 2/15 rendu le 16 mai 2017 par la Cour de justice de l'Union européenne (CJUE) et ses implications juridiques tant sur l'accord avec Singapour et le Japon que sur les modalités de vote au sein du Conseil

openEuropean Union· European Parliament· FR

Introduced

20 March 2018

Last action

20 March 2018 · Written question

Status

QUESTION_WRITTEN_PRIORITY

Sponsors

Claude ROLIN

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

20 March 2018

Official sourceDownload fileView documentsShare

Official titles

Authentic titles published by the source. The stored canonical title is not replaced.

1 official language

  • English

    Opinion 2/15 of 16 May 2017 of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) and its legal implications on both the agreements with Singapore and Japan and the Council's voting methods

Records

Official record P-8-2018-001694 from European Union at European Parliament. Dated 20 March 2018. Status: QUESTION_WRITTEN_PRIORITY.

Timeline

  1. 20 March 2018

    Written question

    Avis 2/15 rendu le 16 mai 2017 par la Cour de justice de l'Union européenne (CJUE) et ses implications juridiques tant sur l'accord avec Singapour et le Japon que sur les modalités de vote au sein du Conseil

    Source: QUESTION_WRITTEN_PRIORITY

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

11 official files

Answer

View fileDownload file

This file cannot be previewed here. Use View or Download.

Reading translation

Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

  • Answer

    QUESTION_WRITTEN_ANSWER

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Opinion 2/15 of 16 May 2017 of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) and its legal implications on both the agreements with Singapore and Japan and the Council's voting methods

    QUESTION_WRITTEN_PRIORITY · EN · 26 March 2018

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Opinion 2/15 of 16 May 2017 of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) and its legal implications on both the agreements with Singapore and Japan and the Council's voting methods

    QUESTION_WRITTEN_PRIORITY · EN · 26 March 2018

    DownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Avis 2/15 rendu le 16 mai 2017 par la Cour de justice de l'Union européenne (CJUE) et ses implications juridiques tant sur l'accord avec Singapour et le Japon que sur les modalités de vote au sein du Conseil

    QUESTION_WRITTEN_PRIORITY · FR · 26 March 2018

    DownloadOpen at official source

    Reading translation

    Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

    On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

  • Avis 2/15 rendu le 16 mai 2017 par la Cour de justice de l'Union européenne (CJUE) et ses implications juridiques tant sur l'accord avec Singapour et le Japon que sur les modalités de vote au sein du Conseil

    QUESTION_WRITTEN_PRIORITY · FR · 26 March 2018

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Reading translation

    Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

    On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

  • Avis 2/15 rendu le 16 mai 2017 par la Cour de justice de l'Union européenne (CJUE) et ses implications juridiques tant sur l'accord avec Singapour et le Japon que sur les modalités de vote au sein du Conseil

    QUESTION_WRITTEN_PRIORITY · FR · 26 March 2018

    DownloadOpen at official source

    Reading translation

    Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

    On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

  • Avis 2/15 rendu le 16 mai 2017 par la Cour de justice de l'Union européenne (CJUE) et ses implications juridiques tant sur l'accord avec Singapour et le Japon que sur les modalités de vote au sein du Conseil

    QUESTION_WRITTEN_PRIORITY · FR · 26 March 2018

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Reading translation

    Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

    On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

  • Avis 2/15 rendu le 16 mai 2017 par la Cour de justice de l'Union européenne (CJUE) et ses implications juridiques tant sur l'accord avec Singapour et le Japon que sur les modalités de vote au sein du Conseil

    QUESTION_WRITTEN_PRIORITY · FR · 26 March 2018

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Reading translation

    Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

    On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

  • Opinion 2/15 of 16 May 2017 of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) and its legal implications on both the agreements with Singapore and Japan and the Council's voting methods

    QUESTION_WRITTEN_PRIORITY · EN · 26 March 2018

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Opinion 2/15 of 16 May 2017 of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) and its legal implications on both the agreements with Singapore and Japan and the Council's voting methods

    QUESTION_WRITTEN_PRIORITY · EN · 26 March 2018

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Opinion 2/15 of 16 May 2017 of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) and its legal implications on both the agreements with Singapore and Japan and the Council's voting methods

    QUESTION_WRITTEN_PRIORITY · EN · 26 March 2018

    DownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.