European Union · Record · QUESTION_WRITTEN_PRIORITY
P-9-2020-004150
Dangers of automatic facial recognition - latest revelations by journalists in the ‘PimEyes’ case
Introduced
13 July 2020
Last action
—
Status
QUESTION_WRITTEN_PRIORITY
Sponsors
—
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
13 July 2020
Official titles
Authentic titles published by the source. The stored canonical title is not replaced.
1 official language
English
Dangers of automatic facial recognition - latest revelations by journalists in the ‘PimEyes’ case
Records
Official record P-9-2020-004150 from European Union at European Parliament. Dated 13 July 2020. Status: QUESTION_WRITTEN_PRIORITY.
Timeline
No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
7 official files
Dangers of automatic facial recognition - latest revelations by journalists in the ‘PimEyes’ case
Dangers of automatic facial recognition - latest revelations by journalists in the ‘PimEyes’ case
QUESTION_WRITTEN_PRIORITY · EN · 15 July 2020
Dangers of automatic facial recognition - latest revelations by journalists in the ‘PimEyes’ case
QUESTION_WRITTEN_PRIORITY · EN · 15 July 2020
Dangers of automatic facial recognition - latest revelations by journalists in the ‘PimEyes’ case
QUESTION_WRITTEN_PRIORITY · EN · 15 July 2020
Answer
QUESTION_WRITTEN_ANSWER
Gefahren der automatischen Gesichtserkennung – neueste Enthüllungen von Journalisten im Fall „PimEyes“
QUESTION_WRITTEN_PRIORITY · DE · 15 July 2020
Gefahren der automatischen Gesichtserkennung – neueste Enthüllungen von Journalisten im Fall „PimEyes“
QUESTION_WRITTEN_PRIORITY · DE · 15 July 2020
Gefahren der automatischen Gesichtserkennung – neueste Enthüllungen von Journalisten im Fall „PimEyes“
QUESTION_WRITTEN_PRIORITY · DE · 15 July 2020
Sponsors
No sponsors or actors listed by the source.
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.