European Union · Record · QUESTION_WRITTEN_PRIORITY
P-9-2020-005905
The European Electronic Communications Code and the potential illegality of child protection tools
Introduced
29 October 2020
Last action
—
Status
QUESTION_WRITTEN_PRIORITY
Sponsors
—
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
29 October 2020
Official titles
Authentic titles published by the source. The stored canonical title is not replaced.
1 official language
Slovak
Európsky kódex elektronických komunikácií a potenciálna nezákonnosť nástrojov na ochranu detí
Records
Official record P-9-2020-005905 from European Union at European Parliament. Dated 29 October 2020. Status: QUESTION_WRITTEN_PRIORITY.
Timeline
No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
7 official files
The European Electronic Communications Code and the potential illegality of child protection tools
The European Electronic Communications Code and the potential illegality of child protection tools
QUESTION_WRITTEN_PRIORITY · EN · 3 November 2020
The European Electronic Communications Code and the potential illegality of child protection tools
QUESTION_WRITTEN_PRIORITY · EN · 3 November 2020
The European Electronic Communications Code and the potential illegality of child protection tools
QUESTION_WRITTEN_PRIORITY · EN · 3 November 2020
Answer
QUESTION_WRITTEN_ANSWER
Európsky kódex elektronických komunikácií a potenciálna nezákonnosť nástrojov na ochranu detí
QUESTION_WRITTEN_PRIORITY · SK · 3 November 2020
Európsky kódex elektronických komunikácií a potenciálna nezákonnosť nástrojov na ochranu detí
QUESTION_WRITTEN_PRIORITY · SK · 3 November 2020
Európsky kódex elektronických komunikácií a potenciálna nezákonnosť nástrojov na ochranu detí
QUESTION_WRITTEN_PRIORITY · SK · 3 November 2020
Sponsors
No sponsors or actors listed by the source.
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.