European Union · Record · QUESTION_WRITTEN_PRIORITY
P-9-2020-006814
Personal protective equipment (PPE) and its use in the rescEU programme – standards and certifications
Introduced
11 December 2020
Last action
—
Status
QUESTION_WRITTEN_PRIORITY
Sponsors
—
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
11 December 2020
Official titles
Authentic titles published by the source. The stored canonical title is not replaced.
1 official language
Czech
Osobní ochranné prostředky (OOP) a jejich využití v programu rescEU – normy a certifikace
Records
Official record P-9-2020-006814 from European Union at European Parliament. Dated 11 December 2020. Status: QUESTION_WRITTEN_PRIORITY.
Timeline
No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
7 official files
Personal protective equipment (PPE) and its use in the rescEU programme – standards and certifications
Personal protective equipment (PPE) and its use in the rescEU programme – standards and certifications
QUESTION_WRITTEN_PRIORITY · EN · 16 December 2020
Personal protective equipment (PPE) and its use in the rescEU programme – standards and certifications
QUESTION_WRITTEN_PRIORITY · EN · 16 December 2020
Personal protective equipment (PPE) and its use in the rescEU programme – standards and certifications
QUESTION_WRITTEN_PRIORITY · EN · 16 December 2020
Answer
QUESTION_WRITTEN_ANSWER
Osobní ochranné prostředky (OOP) a jejich využití v programu rescEU – normy a certifikace
QUESTION_WRITTEN_PRIORITY · CS · 16 December 2020
Osobní ochranné prostředky (OOP) a jejich využití v programu rescEU – normy a certifikace
QUESTION_WRITTEN_PRIORITY · CS · 16 December 2020
Osobní ochranné prostředky (OOP) a jejich využití v programu rescEU – normy a certifikace
QUESTION_WRITTEN_PRIORITY · CS · 16 December 2020
Sponsors
No sponsors or actors listed by the source.
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.