Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Person

Official portrait of Neil Duncan-Jordan

Neil Duncan-Jordan

United Kingdom · Official source

Memberships

  • Labour · Commons · present
  • · Commons · 4 July 2024 – present

Votes

Browse all 240 votes

Showing the 24 most recent votes of 240. Browse the full list

Records

Browse all 104 records
Motion· Early Day MotionEDM 938open

Retaining the Triple Lock on pensions

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 12 October 2026

That this House urges the Government to retain the triple lock on pensions in its current form; recognises that the triple lock doesn’t apply to the old state pension system that the majority of pensioners receive; expresses concern that 1.9 million pensioners are currently living in poverty; regrets that, even with the triple lock, many pensioners cannot afford to heat their homes or pay bills without cutting back on essentials, while means-tested Pension Credit fails to reach up to 800,000 of the poorest pensioners; believes this demonstrates the benefits of universalism and the shortcomings of an expensive, bureaucratic means-tested system; rejects claims that pensioners have it too good, noting the UK provides a less generous State Pension than comparable countries despite having an older retirement age than the OECD average; opposes pitting old against young and defends the intergenerational solidarity the State Pension is founded upon; further believes that younger generations will need the State Pension even more as the strength of occupational pension provision worsens; also believes that protecting the State Pension against rising living costs is essential to ensuring future generations can retire securely, and that an expansive social care system free at the point of use is essential to older people’s welfare; further rejects funding decent social care by cutting other parts of the social safety net; and calls on the Government to fund both strong pensions and a National Care Service through progressive taxation, ensuring that after a lifetime of work people can enjoy dignity.

Motion· Early Day MotionEDM 795open

Royal National Lifeboat Institution

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 10 September 2026

That this House gives its unreserved support to the Royal National Lifeboat Institution (RNLI), its many local lifeboat stations around the country and the thousands of staff and volunteers that are involved in upholding the charity’s long-held aims and values; recognises that their job is to rescue those in danger without fear or favour, saving lives based on need rather than engaging in political debates; is appalled that the RNLI has recently been the target of unwarranted and unacceptable public criticism, including protests outside its headquarters in the Poole constituency, the abuse of local volunteers and the intimidatory tactics whereby personal addresses of volunteers have been published online, alongside accusations that they are traitors; believes that the RNLI represents the very best of Britain and that criticism of the charity is unpatriotic; and calls on hon. Members of both Houses to stand in solidarity with the charity and the selfless work of all who are involved.

Motion· Early Day MotionEDM 789open

Review of Personal Independence Payment

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 9 September 2026

That this House requests that the Review of Personal Independence Payment (PIP) takes account of the findings of the recent Disability Rights UK, Toynbee Hall, and Commission on Social Security co-produced survey of disabled people in receipt of PIP; notes its key findings that disabled people have major problems with the level, criteria, and processes for PIP; understands that there are further concerns arising from co-produced research by Durham University and Disability Rights UK, that the activity trap is preventing disabled people from engaging in sports and recreation for fear of losing access to PIP; further notes that PIP is essential to working-age disabled people both in and out of work; considers that the PIP Review should prioritise designing a fairer system over working to pre-determined financial projections; and recommends that, to pursue true co-production, the Review must fully engage with disabled people’s organisations to shape Review recommendations.

Showing the 24 most recent records of 104. Browse the full list