Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

Defence

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

144 records in EU in 2020

All countriesUnited States · 41,749Ireland · 23,760United Kingdom · 15,991Germany · 5,712France · 4,098Netherlands · 3,840Austria · 3,566European Union · 2,430Belgium · 5Search this topic

Records

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0081_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 2 April 2020.#João Miguel Barata v European Parliament.#Civil service — Officials — Promotion — Certification procedure — 2016 promotion exercise — Exclusion of the applicant from the final list of officials authorised to take part in the training programme — Article 45a of the Staff Regulations — Obligation to state reasons — Manifest error of assessment — Equal treatment — Rights of the defence.#Case T-81/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 2 April 2020

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0081decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 2 April 2020.#João Miguel Barata v European Parliament.#Civil service — Officials — Promotion — Certification procedure — 2016 promotion exercise — Exclusion of the applicant from the final list of officials authorised to take part in the training programme — Article 45a of the Staff Regulations — Obligation to state reasons — Manifest error of assessment — Equal treatment — Rights of the defence.#Case T-81/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 2 April 2020

Report· CCCELEX 62019CC0104decided

Opinion of Advocate General Pitruzzella delivered on 4 March 2020.#Donex Shipping and Forwarding BV v Staatssecretaris van Financiën.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common commercial policy – Dumping – Anti-dumping duty imposed on imports of certain iron or steel fasteners originating in the People’s Republic of China – Regulation (EC) No 91/2009 – Validity – Regulation (EC) No 384/96 – Article 2(10) and (11) – Rights of the defence.#Case C-104/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 March 2020

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0170_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 12 February 2020 (Extracts).#Alex Kande Mupompa v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo — Freezing of funds — Continued inclusion of the applicant’s name on the list of persons covered — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of the defence — Obligation on the Council to disclose new evidence justifying the renewal of restrictive measures — Error of law — Manifest error of assessment — Right to property — Right to respect for private and family life — Proportionality — Presumption of innocence — Plea of illegality — Modification of the form of order sought.#Case T-170/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 February 2020

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0163_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 12 February 2020 (Extracts).#Gabriel Amisi Kumba v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo — Freezing of funds — Continued inclusion of the applicant’s name on the list of persons covered — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of the defence — Obligation on the Council to disclose new evidence justifying the renewal of restrictive measures — Error of law — Manifest error of assessment — Right to property — Proportionality — Presumption of innocence — Plea of illegality.#Case T-163/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 February 2020

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0168_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 12 February 2020.#John Numbi v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Renewal of the listing of the applicant’s name on the list of persons concerned – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Obligation for the Council to communicate the new elements justifying the renewal of the restrictive measures – Error of law – Manifest error of assessment – Right to property – Proportionality – Presumption of innocence – Plea of illegality.#Case T-168/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 February 2020

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0172_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 12 February 2020.#Muhindo Akili Mundos v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Renewal of the listing of the applicant’s name on the list of persons covered by restrictive measures adopted autonomously by the Union – First listing of applicant’s name on the list of persons covered by the Sanctions Committee of the United Nations Security Council – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Obligation for the Council to communicate the new elements justifying the renewal of the restrictive measures – Error of law – Manifest error of assessment – Right to property – Proportionality – Presumption of innocence – Plea of illegality.#Case T-172/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 February 2020

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0173_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 12 February 2020.#Emmanuel Ramazani Shadary v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Renewal of the listing of the applicant’s name on the list of persons concerned – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Obligation for the Council to communicate the new elements justifying the renewal of the restrictive measures – Error of law – Manifest error of assessment – Right to property – Proportionality – Presumption of innocence – Plea of illegality.#Case T-173/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 February 2020

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0163decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 12 February 2020 (Extracts).#Gabriel Amisi Kumba v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo — Freezing of funds — Continued inclusion of the applicant’s name on the list of persons covered — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of the defence — Obligation on the Council to disclose new evidence justifying the renewal of restrictive measures — Error of law — Manifest error of assessment — Right to property — Proportionality — Presumption of innocence — Plea of illegality.#Case T-163/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 February 2020

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0165_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 12 February 2020.#Delphin Kahimbi Kasagwe v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo — Freezing of funds — Renewal of the listing of the applicant’s name on the list of persons concerned — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of the defence — Obligation for the Council to communicate the new elements justifying the renewal of the restrictive measures — Error of law — Manifest error of assessment — Right to property — Right to respect for private and family life — Proportionality — Presumption of innocence — Plea of illegality.#Case T-165/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 February 2020

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0164_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 12 February 2020.#Ilunga Kampete v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Renewal of the listing of the applicant’s name on the list of persons concerned – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Obligation for the Council to communicate the new elements justifying the renewal of the restrictive measures – Error of law – Manifest error of assessment – Proportionality – Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure – Plea of illegality.#Case T-164/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 February 2020

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0704decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 12 February 2020.#Criminal proceedings against Nikolay Boykov Kolev and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 267 TFEU — Implementation of a preliminary ruling of the Court — Power of a higher court to impose an injunction relating to the detailed rules for implementation — Procedural autonomy of the Member States — Principle of effectiveness — Observance of the rights of the defence.#Case C-704/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 February 2020

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0170decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 12 February 2020 (Extracts).#Alex Kande Mupompa v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo — Freezing of funds — Continued inclusion of the applicant’s name on the list of persons covered — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of the defence — Obligation on the Council to disclose new evidence justifying the renewal of restrictive measures — Error of law — Manifest error of assessment — Right to property — Right to respect for private and family life — Proportionality — Presumption of innocence — Plea of illegality — Modification of the form of order sought.#Case T-170/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 February 2020

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0165decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 12 February 2020.#Delphin Kahimbi Kasagwe v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo — Freezing of funds — Renewal of the listing of the applicant’s name on the list of persons concerned — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of the defence — Obligation for the Council to communicate the new elements justifying the renewal of the restrictive measures — Error of law — Manifest error of assessment — Right to property — Right to respect for private and family life — Proportionality — Presumption of innocence — Plea of illegality.#Case T-165/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 February 2020

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0172decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 12 February 2020.#Muhindo Akili Mundos v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Renewal of the listing of the applicant’s name on the list of persons covered by restrictive measures adopted autonomously by the Union – First listing of applicant’s name on the list of persons covered by the Sanctions Committee of the United Nations Security Council – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Obligation for the Council to communicate the new elements justifying the renewal of the restrictive measures – Error of law – Manifest error of assessment – Right to property – Proportionality – Presumption of innocence – Plea of illegality.#Case T-172/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 February 2020

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0171decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 12 February 2020.#Évariste Boshab v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Renewal of the listing of the applicant’s name on the list of persons concerned – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Obligation for the Council to communicate the new elements justifying the renewal of the restrictive measures – Error of law – Manifest error of assessment – Right to property – Right to respect for private and family life – Proportionality – Presumption of innocence – Plea of illegality.#Case T-171/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 February 2020

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0176decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 12 February 2020.#Lambert Mende Omalanga v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Renewal of the listing of the applicant’s name on the list of persons concerned – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Obligation for the Council to communicate the new elements justifying the renewal of the restrictive measures – Error of law – Manifest error of assessment – Right to property – Right to respect for private and family life – Proportionality – Presumption of innocence – Plea of illegality – Modification of the forms of order sought.#Case T-176/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 February 2020

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0173decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 12 February 2020.#Emmanuel Ramazani Shadary v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Renewal of the listing of the applicant’s name on the list of persons concerned – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Obligation for the Council to communicate the new elements justifying the renewal of the restrictive measures – Error of law – Manifest error of assessment – Right to property – Proportionality – Presumption of innocence – Plea of illegality.#Case T-173/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 February 2020

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0177decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 12 February 2020.#Jean-Claude Kazembe Musonda v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Renewal of the listing of the applicant’s name on the list of persons concerned – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Obligation for the Council to communicate the new elements justifying the renewal of the restrictive measures – Error of law – Manifest error of assessment – Proportionality – Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure – Plea of illegality.#Case T-177/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 February 2020

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0167decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 12 February 2020.#Célestin Kanyama v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo — Freezing of funds — Renewal of the applicant’s name on the list of persons concerned — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of the defence — Obligation for the Council to communicate the new elements justifying the renewal of the restrictive measures — Error of law — Manifest error of assessment — Right to property — Right to respect for private and family life — Proportionality — Presumption of innocence — Plea of illegality.#Case T-167/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 February 2020

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0166decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 12 February 2020.#Ferdinand Ilunga Luyoyo v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Renewal of the listing of the applicant’s name on the list of persons concerned – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Obligation for the Council to communicate the new elements justifying the renewal of the restrictive measures – Error of law – Manifest error of assessment – Right to property – Right to respect for private and family life – Proportionality – Presumption of innocence – Plea of illegality.#Case T-166/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 February 2020

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0175decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 12 February 2020.#Éric Ruhorimbere v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Renewal of the listing of the applicant’s name on the list of persons concerned – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Obligation for the Council to communicate the new elements justifying the renewal of the restrictive measures – Error of law – Manifest error of assessment – Right to property – Right to respect for private and family life – Proportionality – Presumption of innocence – Plea of illegality.#Case T-175/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 February 2020

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0168decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 12 February 2020.#John Numbi v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Renewal of the listing of the applicant’s name on the list of persons concerned – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Obligation for the Council to communicate the new elements justifying the renewal of the restrictive measures – Error of law – Manifest error of assessment – Right to property – Proportionality – Presumption of innocence – Plea of illegality.#Case T-168/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 February 2020

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0169decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 12 February 2020.#Roger Kibelisa Ngambasai v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Renewal of the listing of the applicant’s name on the list of persons concerned – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Obligation for the Council to communicate the new elements justifying the renewal of the restrictive measures – Error of law – Manifest error of assessment – Proportionality – Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure – Plea of illegality.#Case T-169/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 February 2020

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0167_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 12 February 2020.#Célestin Kanyama v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo — Freezing of funds — Renewal of the applicant’s name on the list of persons concerned — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of the defence — Obligation for the Council to communicate the new elements justifying the renewal of the restrictive measures — Error of law — Manifest error of assessment — Right to property — Right to respect for private and family life — Proportionality — Presumption of innocence — Plea of illegality.#Case T-167/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 February 2020

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0174_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 12 February 2020.#Kalev Mutondo v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Renewal of the listing of the applicant’s name on the list of persons concerned – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Obligation for the Council to communicate the new elements justifying the renewal of the restrictive measures – Error of law – Manifest error of assessment – Right to property – Proportionality – Presumption of innocence – Plea of illegality.#Case T-174/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 February 2020

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0171_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 12 February 2020.#Évariste Boshab v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Renewal of the listing of the applicant’s name on the list of persons concerned – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Obligation for the Council to communicate the new elements justifying the renewal of the restrictive measures – Error of law – Manifest error of assessment – Right to property – Right to respect for private and family life – Proportionality – Presumption of innocence – Plea of illegality.#Case T-171/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 February 2020

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0169_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 12 February 2020.#Roger Kibelisa Ngambasai v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Renewal of the listing of the applicant’s name on the list of persons concerned – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Obligation for the Council to communicate the new elements justifying the renewal of the restrictive measures – Error of law – Manifest error of assessment – Proportionality – Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure – Plea of illegality.#Case T-169/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 February 2020

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0175_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 12 February 2020.#Éric Ruhorimbere v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Renewal of the listing of the applicant’s name on the list of persons concerned – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Obligation for the Council to communicate the new elements justifying the renewal of the restrictive measures – Error of law – Manifest error of assessment – Right to property – Right to respect for private and family life – Proportionality – Presumption of innocence – Plea of illegality.#Case T-175/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 February 2020

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0166_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 12 February 2020.#Ferdinand Ilunga Luyoyo v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Renewal of the listing of the applicant’s name on the list of persons concerned – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Obligation for the Council to communicate the new elements justifying the renewal of the restrictive measures – Error of law – Manifest error of assessment – Right to property – Right to respect for private and family life – Proportionality – Presumption of innocence – Plea of illegality.#Case T-166/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 February 2020

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0164decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 12 February 2020.#Ilunga Kampete v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Renewal of the listing of the applicant’s name on the list of persons concerned – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Obligation for the Council to communicate the new elements justifying the renewal of the restrictive measures – Error of law – Manifest error of assessment – Proportionality – Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure – Plea of illegality.#Case T-164/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 February 2020

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0174decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 12 February 2020.#Kalev Mutondo v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Renewal of the listing of the applicant’s name on the list of persons concerned – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Obligation for the Council to communicate the new elements justifying the renewal of the restrictive measures – Error of law – Manifest error of assessment – Right to property – Proportionality – Presumption of innocence – Plea of illegality.#Case T-174/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 February 2020

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0176_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 12 February 2020.#Lambert Mende Omalanga v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Renewal of the listing of the applicant’s name on the list of persons concerned – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Obligation for the Council to communicate the new elements justifying the renewal of the restrictive measures – Error of law – Manifest error of assessment – Right to property – Right to respect for private and family life – Proportionality – Presumption of innocence – Plea of illegality – Modification of the forms of order sought.#Case T-176/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 February 2020

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0177_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 12 February 2020.#Jean-Claude Kazembe Musonda v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Renewal of the listing of the applicant’s name on the list of persons concerned – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Obligation for the Council to communicate the new elements justifying the renewal of the restrictive measures – Error of law – Manifest error of assessment – Proportionality – Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure – Plea of illegality.#Case T-177/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 February 2020

Record· COCELEX 62019CO0011decided

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 6 February 2020.#Azienda ULSS n. 6 Euganea v Pia Opera Croce Verde Padova.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Public procurement – Directive 2014/24/EU – Article 10(h) – Article 12(4) – Specific exclusions for service contracts – Civil defence, civil protection, and danger prevention services – Non-profit organisations or associations – Ordinary and emergency medical transport services – Regional legislation requiring priority to be given to recourse to a partnership between contracting authorities – Freedom of the Member States to choose how services are provided – Limits – Obligation to state reasons.#Case C-11/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 February 2020

PreviousPage 3 of 3