Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

European Union

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

630 records in EU in 2026

Records

Record· COCELEX 62025CO0665_INFdecided

Order of the Court of 14 January 2026.#Josep Francesc Gómez Jiménez and Others v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-665/25 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 January 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62025TJ0229_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 14 January 2026.#Ionfarma, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark DESMOMED – Prior national word mark DERMOMED – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – No similarity between the goods at issue – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-229/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 January 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62025TJ0230_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 14 January 2026.#Ionfarma, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark DESMOMED – Prior national word mark DERMOMED – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – No similarity between the goods at issue – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-230/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 January 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62025TJ0117_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 14 January 2026.#Atlas Invest BV v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for the European Union figurative mark BioTechUSA – Absolute ground for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-117/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 January 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62025TJ0140_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 14 January 2026.#Variuscard Produktions- und Handels GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU word mark CRYPTOSTAMP – Absolute ground for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Equal treatment – Principle of good administration.#Case T-140/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 January 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0549_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 14 January 2026.#Schönegger Käse-Alm GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark Rebell – Declaration of revocation in part – Decision taken following the annulment by the General Court of an earlier decision – Article 72(6) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Interruption of proceedings – Article 106(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Resumption of proceedings – Article 72(1) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 – Application for revocation – Article 63(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Notifications to representatives – Article 60(1) of Delegated Regulation 2018/625.#Case T-549/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 January 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62025TJ0009_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 14 January 2026.#Kct GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for a European Union trade mark consisting of the movement of a folding window – Absolute ground for refusal – Sign consisting exclusively of a feature of the goods which is necessary to obtain a technical result – Article 7(1)(e)(ii) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-9/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 January 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0176_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 14 January 2026.#Feras Al Akhras v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Syria – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources and subject to restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – ‘Family membership’ criterion – Criterion of ‘association with members of the Assad or Makhlouf families’ – Plea of illegality – Obligation to state reasons – Communication of the restrictive measures – Error of assessment – Proportionality – Freedom to conduct a business – Right to property.#Case T-176/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 January 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62025TJ0229decided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 14 January 2026.#Ionfarma, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark DESMOMED – Prior national word mark DERMOMED – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – No similarity between the goods at issue – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-229/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 January 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62025TJ0230decided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 14 January 2026.#Ionfarma, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark DESMOMED – Prior national word mark DERMOMED – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – No similarity between the goods at issue – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-230/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 January 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0628decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 14 January 2026.#Lego A/S v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#European Union design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered EU design representing a building block from a toy building set – Earlier EU design – Ground for invalidity – No individual character – No different overall impression – Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.#Case T-628/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 January 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0549decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 14 January 2026.#Schönegger Käse-Alm GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark Rebell – Declaration of revocation in part – Decision taken following the annulment by the General Court of an earlier decision – Article 72(6) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Interruption of proceedings – Article 106(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Resumption of proceedings – Article 72(1) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 – Application for revocation – Article 63(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Notifications to representatives – Article 60(1) of Delegated Regulation 2018/625.#Case T-549/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 January 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0232decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 14 January 2026.#Euro Asia Cargo Private Ltd v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine – Prohibitions relating to dual-use goods and technology – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the prohibitions – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – Annex IV to Decision (CFSP) 2014/512 and Annex IV to Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 – Right to be heard – Obligation to state reasons – Error of assessment – Freedom to conduct a business.#Case T-232/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 January 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0619decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 14 January 2026.#Kimpton Hotel & Restaurant Group LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Applications for the EU word marks Kimkom and Kimsum – Earlier EU word mark KIMPTON – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Similarity of the services – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Cases T-619/24 and T-621/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 January 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0176decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 14 January 2026.#Feras Al Akhras v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Syria – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources and subject to restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – ‘Family membership’ criterion – Criterion of ‘association with members of the Assad or Makhlouf families’ – Plea of illegality – Obligation to state reasons – Communication of the restrictive measures – Error of assessment – Proportionality – Freedom to conduct a business – Right to property.#Case T-176/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 January 2026

Record· TOCELEX 62025TO0200decided

Order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 14 January 2026.#Giftrans SRL and Florin Giurgiuman v European Commission.#Action for annulment – Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – Administrative investigation conducted by OLAF to support or complement the EPPO’s activity – Article 101(3)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1939 – OLAF Final Report – Act not open to challenge – Inadmissibility.#Case T-200/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 January 2026

Record· TOCELEX 62025TO0200_INFdecided

Order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 14 January 2026.#Giftrans SRL and Florin Giurgiuman v European Commission.#Action for annulment – Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – Administrative investigation conducted by OLAF to support or complement the EPPO’s activity – Article 101(3)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1939 – OLAF Final Report – Act not open to challenge – Inadmissibility.#Case T-200/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 January 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0619_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 14 January 2026.#Kimpton Hotel & Restaurant Group LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Applications for the EU word marks Kimkom and Kimsum – Earlier EU word mark KIMPTON – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Similarity of the services – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Cases T-619/24 and T-621/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 January 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0517decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 14 January 2026.#Froneri Bulgaria EOOD v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#European Union design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered EU design representing a box with a lid – Grounds for invalidity – Individual character – Different overall impression – Novelty – Articles 5 and 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 in the version prior to Regulation (EU) 2024/2822.#Case T-517/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 January 2026

Proposal· PCCELEX 52026PC0005open

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the position to be adopted, on behalf of the European Union, within the Joint Committee established under the Protocol to the Agreement on the international occasional carriage of passengers by coach and bus (Interbus Agreement) regarding the international regular and special regular carriage of passengers by coach and bus, as regards draft Decision No x/xxxx of that Committee establishing its Rules of Procedure

European Union · European Commission · 14 January 2026

PreviousPage 13 of 13