Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

European Union

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

1,551 records in EU in 2023

All countriesEuropean Union · 19,773France · 7,181Ireland · 5,714United Kingdom · 1,357Netherlands · 778Austria · 331Germany · 305United States · 141Belgium · 1Estonia · 1Search this topic

Records

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0349decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 1 February 2023.#Hacker-Pschorr Bräu GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark HACKER SPACE – Earlier EU word mark HACKER-PSCHORR and earlier EU figurative mark Hacker Pschorr, as well as earlier national word marks HACKERBRÄU and HACKER – Relative ground for refusal – Identification of the ground on which the opposition is based – Article 8(1)(a) and (b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 2(2)(c) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625.#Case T-349/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 1 February 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0568decided

Judgment of the General Court (Single Judge) of 1 February 2023.#Zoubier Harbaoui v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark GC GOOGLE CAR – Earlier EU word mark GOOGLE – Relative ground for refusal – Taking unfair advantage of the distinctive character or repute of the earlier mark – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-568/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 1 February 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0565decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 1 February 2023.#Foundation for the Protection of the Traditional Cheese of Cyprus named Halloumi v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark Papouis Halloumi – Earlier EU collective word mark HALLOUMI – Relative ground for refusal – Similarity of the signs – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-565/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 1 February 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0772decided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 February 2023.#Brobet ltd. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU figurative mark efbet – Genuine use of a mark – Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Proof of genuine use – Article 95 of Regulation 2017/1001 – Article 27(4) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625.#Case T-772/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 1 February 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0470decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 1 February 2023.#Oleksandr Viktorovych Klymenko v Council of the European Union.#Non-contractual liability – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine – List of the persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Limitation – Partial inadmissibility – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals – Non-material damage – Fact of damage – Causal link.#Case T-470/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 1 February 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0671decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 1 February 2023.#NFL Properties Europe GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark DUUUVAL – Earlier EU figurative mark GROUPE DUVAL – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-671/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 1 February 2023

Record· COCELEX 62022CO0702_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 1 February 2023.#Okan Balaban v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-702/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 1 February 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0558decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 1 February 2023.#Foundation for the Protection of the Traditional Cheese of Cyprus named Halloumi v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark fino Cyprus Halloumi Cheese – Earlier EU collective word mark HALLOUMI – Relative ground for refusal – Similarity of the signs – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-558/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 1 February 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0569decided

Judgment of the General Court (Single Judge) of 1 February 2023.#Zoubier Harbaoui v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark GOOGLE CAR – Earlier EU word mark GOOGLE – Relative ground for refusal – Taking unfair advantage of the distinctive character or repute of the earlier mark – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-569/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 1 February 2023

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0158_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 31 January 2023.#Criminal proceedings against Lluís Puig Gordi and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – European arrest warrant – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – Surrender procedures between Member States – Conditions for execution – Jurisdiction of the issuing judicial authority – Second paragraph of Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right of access to a tribunal previously established by law – Possibility of issuing a new European arrest warrant relating to the same person.#Case C-158/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 31 January 2023

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0158decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 31 January 2023.#Criminal proceedings against Lluís Puig Gordi and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – European arrest warrant – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – Surrender procedures between Member States – Conditions for execution – Jurisdiction of the issuing judicial authority – Second paragraph of Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right of access to a tribunal previously established by law – Possibility of issuing a new European arrest warrant relating to the same person.#Case C-158/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 31 January 2023

Record· COCELEX 62022CO0580decided

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 30 January 2023.#bonnanwalt Vermögens- und Beteiligungsgesellschaft mbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request demonstrating that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal allowed to proceed.#Case C-580/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 January 2023

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0205decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 January 2023.#Criminal proceedings against V.S.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Directive (EU) 2016/680 – Article 4(1)(a) to (c) – Principles relating to processing of personal data – Purpose limitation – Data minimisation – Article 6(a) – Clear distinction between personal data of different categories of data subjects – Article 8 – Lawfulness of processing – Article 10 – Transposition – Processing of biometric data and genetic data – Concept of ‘processing authorised by Member State law’ – Concept of ‘strictly necessary’ – Discretion – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Articles 7, 8, 47, 48 and 52 – Right to effective judicial protection – Presumption of innocence – Limitation – Intentional criminal offence subject to public prosecution – Accused persons – Collection of photographic and dactyloscopic data in order for them to be entered in a record and taking of a biological sample for the purpose of creating a DNA profile – Procedure for enforcement of collection – Systematic nature of the collection.#Case C-205/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 January 2023

Report· CCCELEX 62021CC0660decided

Opinion of Advocate General Pikamäe delivered on 26 January 2023.#Criminal proceedings against K.B. and F.S.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal correctionnel de Villefranche-sur-Saône.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Directive 2012/13/EU – Articles 3 and 4 – Obligation for the competent authorities to inform suspects and accused persons promptly of their right to remain silent – Article 8(2) – Right to invoke a breach of that obligation – National legislation prohibiting the trial court from raising such a breach of its own motion – Articles 47 and 48 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.#Case C-660/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 January 2023

Report· CCCELEX 62021CC0689decided

Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar delivered on 26 January 2023.#X v Udlændinge- og Integrationsministeriet.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Østre Landsret.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Citizenship of the European Union – Article 20 TFEU – Article 7 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Citizen holding the nationality of a Member State and the nationality of a third country – Loss of the nationality of the Member State by operation of law upon reaching the age of 22 on the ground of lack of a genuine link with that Member State where no application to retain nationality has been made before the date on which that age is reached – Loss of citizenship of the Union – Examination of the proportionality of the consequences of that loss from the point of view of EU law – Limitation period.#Case C-689/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 January 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0351decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 25 January 2023.#De Dietrich Process Systems GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark SCHEIBEL – Absolute ground for invalidity – Article 7(1)(c) and Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(c) and Article 59(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-351/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 January 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0703decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 25 January 2023.#Zielonogórski Klub Żużlowy Sportowa S.A. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark FALUBAZ – Absolute ground for invalidity – Bad faith – Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-703/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 January 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0163_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 25 January 2023.#Emilio De Capitani v Council of the European Union.#Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Documents concerning an ongoing legislative procedure – Council working groups – Documents concerning a legislative proposal to amend Directive 2013/34/EU on the annual financial statements, consolidated financial statements and related reports of certain types of undertakings – Partial refusal to grant access – Action for annulment – Interest in bringing proceedings – Admissibility – First subparagraph of Article 4(3) of Regulation No 1049/2001 – Exception relating to the protection of the decision-making process.#Case T-163/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 January 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0351_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 25 January 2023.#De Dietrich Process Systems GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark SCHEIBEL – Absolute ground for invalidity – Article 7(1)(c) and Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(c) and Article 59(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-351/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 January 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0320_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 25 January 2023.#Scania CV AB v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU figurative mark V8 – Absolute grounds for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – No distinctive character acquired through use – Article 7(3) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-320/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 January 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0352decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 25 January 2023.#De Dietrich Process Systems GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark KARR – Absolute ground for invalidity – Article 7(1)(c) and Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(c) and Article 59(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-352/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 January 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0320decided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 25 January 2023.#Scania CV AB v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU figurative mark V8 – Absolute grounds for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – No distinctive character acquired through use – Article 7(3) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-320/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 January 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0163decided

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 25 January 2023.#Emilio De Capitani v Council of the European Union.#Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Documents concerning an ongoing legislative procedure – Council working groups – Documents concerning a legislative proposal to amend Directive 2013/34/EU on the annual financial statements, consolidated financial statements and related reports of certain types of undertakings – Partial refusal to grant access – Action for annulment – Interest in bringing proceedings – Admissibility – First subparagraph of Article 4(3) of Regulation No 1049/2001 – Exception relating to the protection of the decision-making process.#Case T-163/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 January 2023

Record· TOCELEX 62021TO0785_INFdecided

Order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 25 January 2023.#SC Ha Ha Ha Production SRL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Action for annulment – EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark SMILEY – Earlier EU word marks SMILEY, SMILEY TV and SMILEY – Cross-claim – No interest in bringing proceedings – Inadmissibility.#Case T-785/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 January 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0352_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 25 January 2023.#De Dietrich Process Systems GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark KARR – Absolute ground for invalidity – Article 7(1)(c) and Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(c) and Article 59(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-352/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 January 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0703_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 25 January 2023.#Zielonogórski Klub Żużlowy Sportowa S.A. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark FALUBAZ – Absolute ground for invalidity – Bad faith – Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-703/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 January 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0758_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 18 January 2023.#Dorsum Informatikai Fejlesztő és Szolgáltató Zrt. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark Clavis – Earlier EU word mark CLAVIS – Failure to identify the earlier trade mark in the notice of opposition – Conditions for admissibility of the opposition.#Case T-758/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 January 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0443_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 18 January 2023.#YAplus DBA Yoga Alliance v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark YOGA ALLIANCE INDIA INTERNATIONAL – Earlier EU figurative mark yoga ALLIANCE – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Examination of the facts by EUIPO of its own motion – Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-443/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 January 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0528decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 18 January 2023.#Neratax LTD v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word marks ELLO and MORFAT and EU figurative marks ELLO ERMOL, Ello creamy and MORFAT Creamy – Absolute ground for invalidity – Bad faith – Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-528/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 January 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0758decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 18 January 2023.#Dorsum Informatikai Fejlesztő és Szolgáltató Zrt. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark Clavis – Earlier EU word mark CLAVIS – Failure to identify the earlier trade mark in the notice of opposition – Conditions for admissibility of the opposition.#Case T-758/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 January 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0443decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 18 January 2023.#YAplus DBA Yoga Alliance v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark YOGA ALLIANCE INDIA INTERNATIONAL – Earlier EU figurative mark yoga ALLIANCE – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Examination of the facts by EUIPO of its own motion – Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-443/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 January 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0528_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 18 January 2023.#Neratax LTD v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word marks ELLO and MORFAT and EU figurative marks ELLO ERMOL, Ello creamy and MORFAT Creamy – Absolute ground for invalidity – Bad faith – Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-528/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 January 2023

PreviousPage 31 of 32Next