Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

European Union

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

251 records in EU in 2019

Records

Decision· DCELEX 32019D1918in force

Council Decision (EU) 2019/1918 of 8 November 2019 on the signing, on behalf of the European Union, and provisional application of the Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Union and the Islamic Republic of Mauritania on an extension to the Protocol setting out the fishing opportunities and financial contribution provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Islamic Republic of Mauritania, expiring on 15 November 2019

European Union · EUR-Lex · 8 November 2019

Decision· DCELEX 32019D1911in force

Council Decision (EU) 2019/1911 of 8 November 2019 on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union in the relevant Committees of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe as regards the proposals for modifications to UN Regulations Nos 0, 16, 17, 21, 29, 43, 44, 48, 53, 55, 58, 67, 74, 80, 83, 85, 86, 98, 107, 112, 113, 115, 116, 123, 129, 135, 148, 149 and 150, as regards the proposal for modifications to Global Technical Regulation (GTR) No 2, as regards the proposal for amendments to Mutual Resolution MR.1, as regards the proposals for amendments to Consolidated Resolutions R.E.3 and R.E.5, and as regards the proposals for authorisations to develop an amendment to GTR No 6 and to develop a new GTR on the Determination of Electrified Vehicle Power

European Union · EUR-Lex · 8 November 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0380_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 7 November 2019 (Extracts).#Intas Pharmaceuticals Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark INTAS — Earlier EU and national figurative trade marks including the word element ‘indas’ — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs and of the goods — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Proof of genuine use of the earlier marks — Article 47 of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-380/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 November 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0240decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 7 November 2019.#A9.com, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Application for an EU figurative mark representing a bell — Absolute ground for refusal — Obligation to state reasons — Article 94 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-240/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 November 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0346_INFdecided

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 7 November 2019.#Rose Vision, SL v European Commission.#Appeal — Projects financed by the European Union in the area of research — Seventh Framework programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) — Grant agreements relating to the FIRST, FutureNEM, sISI, 4NEM and SFERA projects — Audits finding irregularities in the implementation of certain projects — European Commission decisions suspending payment of the amounts payable under other projects — Action for compensation and annulment.#Case C-346/18 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 November 2019

Report· CCCELEX 62018CC0659decided

Opinion of Advocate General Bobek delivered on 7 November 2019.#Criminal proceedings against VW.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Instrucción de Badalona.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive 2013/48/EU — Article 3(2) — Right of access to a lawyer — Circumstances in which the right of access to a lawyer must be guaranteed — Non-appearance — Derogations from the right of access to a lawyer — Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Right to effective judicial protection.#Case C-659/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 November 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0240_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 7 November 2019.#A9.com, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Application for an EU figurative mark representing a bell — Absolute ground for refusal — Obligation to state reasons — Article 94 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-240/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 November 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0380decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 7 November 2019 (Extracts).#Intas Pharmaceuticals Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark INTAS — Earlier EU and national figurative trade marks including the word element ‘indas’ — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs and of the goods — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Proof of genuine use of the earlier marks — Article 47 of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-380/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 November 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0346decided

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 7 November 2019.#Rose Vision, SL v European Commission.#Appeal — Projects financed by the European Union in the area of research — Seventh Framework programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) — Grant agreements relating to the FIRST, FutureNEM, sISI, 4NEM and SFERA projects — Audits finding irregularities in the implementation of certain projects — European Commission decisions suspending payment of the amounts payable under other projects — Action for compensation and annulment.#Case C-346/18 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 November 2019

Record· COCELEX 62019CO0296decided

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 6 November 2019.#Etnia Dreams, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — No identification of the earlier mark in the notice of opposition — Principles of equal treatment and sound administration — Equality of arms — Legitimate expectations — Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.#Case C-296/19 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 November 2019

Record· COCELEX 62019CO0285_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 6 November 2019.#André Geske v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — EU trade mark — Application for registration of the figurative sign SATISFYERMEN — Dismissal of application — Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.#Case C-285/19 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 November 2019

Record· COCELEX 62019CO0285decided

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 6 November 2019.#André Geske v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — EU trade mark — Application for registration of the figurative sign SATISFYERMEN — Dismissal of application — Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.#Case C-285/19 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 November 2019

Proposal· PCCELEX 52019PC0575open

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the position to be adopted, on behalf of the European Union, in the International Maritime Organization during the 31st session of the IMO Assembly on the adoption of amendments to resolution A.658(16) on the use and fitting of retro-reflective materials on Life-Saving Appliances, Procedures for Port State Control, 2017 (resolution A.1119(30)) and the Survey Guidelines under the Harmonized System of Survey and Certification (HSSC), (resolution A.1120(30))

European Union · European Commission · 6 November 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62017CJ0663_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 5 November 2019.#European Central Bank (ECB) and Others v Trasta Komercbanka and Others.#Appeal — Admissibility — Representation of a party before the Court — Power of attorney given to the lawyer — Power of attorney withdrawn by the liquidator of the appellant company — Further steps in the proceedings by the decision-making body of the appellant company — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 47 — Right to an effective remedy — Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 — Prudential supervision of credit institutions — Decision to withdraw a credit institution’s authorisation — Action for annulment before the General Court of the European Union — Admissibility — Whether the shareholders of the company whose authorisation has been withdrawn are directly concerned.#Joined Cases C-663/17 P, C-665/17 P and C-669/17 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 November 2019

Record· COCELEX 62019CO0622_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 5 November 2019.#Luz Saúde, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — EU trade mark — Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed — Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law — Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-622/19 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 November 2019

Record· COCELEX 62019CO0622decided

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 5 November 2019.#Luz Saúde, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — EU trade mark — Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed — Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law — Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-622/19 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 November 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0361decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 5 November 2019.#Agricultural and Processed Food Products Export Development Authority (APEDA) v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU figurative mark SIR BASMATI RICE — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-361/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 November 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62017CJ0663decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 5 November 2019.#European Central Bank (ECB) and Others v Trasta Komercbanka and Others.#Appeal — Admissibility — Representation of a party before the Court — Power of attorney given to the lawyer — Power of attorney withdrawn by the liquidator of the appellant company — Further steps in the proceedings by the decision-making body of the appellant company — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 47 — Right to an effective remedy — Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 — Prudential supervision of credit institutions — Decision to withdraw a credit institution’s authorisation — Action for annulment before the General Court of the European Union — Admissibility — Whether the shareholders of the company whose authorisation has been withdrawn are directly concerned.#Joined Cases C-663/17 P, C-665/17 P and C-669/17 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 November 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0361_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 5 November 2019.#Agricultural and Processed Food Products Export Development Authority (APEDA) v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU figurative mark SIR BASMATI RICE — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-361/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 November 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62017CJ0395_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 31 October 2019.#European Commission v Kingdom of the Netherlands.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Own resources — Association of the Overseas Countries and Territories (OCT) with the European Union — Decision 91/482/EEC — Decision 2001/822/EC — Acceptance for import into the European Union free of customs duties of products originating in the OCTs — Movement certificate EUR. 1 — Wrongful issue of certificates by the authorities of an OCT — Customs duties not collected by the importing Member States — Article 4(3) TEU — Principle of sincere cooperation — Liability of the Member State having special relations with the OCTs concerned — Obligation to compensate the loss of the European Union’s own resources caused by the wrongful issue of EUR.1 certificates — Imports of milk powder and rice from Curaçao and of groats and meal from Aruba.#Case C-395/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 31 October 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62017CJ0391_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 31 October 2019.#European Commission v United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Own resources — Association of the Overseas Countries and Territories (OCT) with the European Union — Decision 91/482/EEC — Article 101(2) — Acceptance for import into the European Union free of customs duties of products not originating in the OCT but which are in free circulation in an OCT and are re-exported as such to the European Union — Export certificates EXP — Wrongful issue of certificates by the authorities of an OCT — Article 4(3) TEU — Principle of sincere cooperation — Liability of the Member State having special relations with the OCT concerned — Obligation to compensate for the loss of the European Union’s own resources caused by the wrongful issue of export certificates EXP — Imports of aluminium from Anguilla.#Case C-391/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 31 October 2019

Record· COCELEX 62019CO0408_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 31 October 2019.#Hochmann Marketing GmbH v Council of the European Union.#Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Letter of the Council of the European Union stating that it is not entitled to modify the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Act not open to challenge — Manifest inadmissibility of the action at first instance — Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.#Case C-408/19 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 31 October 2019

Report· CCCELEX 62018CC0507decided

Opinion of Advocate General Sharpston delivered on 31 October 2019.#NH v Associazione Avvocatura per i diritti LGBTI - Rete Lenford.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Equal treatment in employment and occupation — Directive 2000/78/EC — Article 3(1)(a), Article 8(1) and Article 9(2) — Prohibition of discrimination based on sexual orientation — Conditions for access to employment or to occupation — Concept — Public statements ruling out recruitment of homosexual persons — Article 11(1), Article 15(1) and Article 21(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Defence of rights — Sanctions — Legal entity representing a collective interest — Standing to bring proceedings without acting in the name of a specific complainant or in the absence of an injured party — Right to damages.#Case C-507/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 31 October 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62017CJ0391decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 31 October 2019.#European Commission v United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Own resources — Association of the Overseas Countries and Territories (OCT) with the European Union — Decision 91/482/EEC — Article 101(2) — Acceptance for import into the European Union free of customs duties of products not originating in the OCT but which are in free circulation in an OCT and are re-exported as such to the European Union — Export certificates EXP — Wrongful issue of certificates by the authorities of an OCT — Article 4(3) TEU — Principle of sincere cooperation — Liability of the Member State having special relations with the OCT concerned — Obligation to compensate for the loss of the European Union’s own resources caused by the wrongful issue of export certificates EXP — Imports of aluminium from Anguilla.#Case C-391/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 31 October 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62017CJ0395decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 31 October 2019.#European Commission v Kingdom of the Netherlands.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Own resources — Association of the Overseas Countries and Territories (OCT) with the European Union — Decision 91/482/EEC — Decision 2001/822/EC — Acceptance for import into the European Union free of customs duties of products originating in the OCTs — Movement certificate EUR. 1 — Wrongful issue of certificates by the authorities of an OCT — Customs duties not collected by the importing Member States — Article 4(3) TEU — Principle of sincere cooperation — Liability of the Member State having special relations with the OCTs concerned — Obligation to compensate the loss of the European Union’s own resources caused by the wrongful issue of EUR.1 certificates — Imports of milk powder and rice from Curaçao and of groats and meal from Aruba.#Case C-395/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 31 October 2019

Record· COCELEX 62019CO0408decided

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 31 October 2019.#Hochmann Marketing GmbH v Council of the European Union.#Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Letter of the Council of the European Union stating that it is not entitled to modify the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Act not open to challenge — Manifest inadmissibility of the action at first instance — Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.#Case C-408/19 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 31 October 2019

Decision· DCELEX 32021D0570in force

Council Decision (EU) 2021/570 of 24 October 2019 on the signing, on behalf of the Union, and provisional application of the Protocol to the Euro-Mediterranean Interim Association Agreement on trade and cooperation between the European Community, of the one part, and the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) for the benefit of the Palestinian Authority of the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, of the other part, on a Framework Agreement between the European Union and the Palestinian Authority of the West Bank and the Gaza Strip on the general principles for its participation in Union programmes

European Union · EUR-Lex · 24 October 2019

Record· COCELEX 62019CO0613_SUMdecided

Beschikking van het Hof (Kamer voor toelating van hogere voorzieningen) van 24 oktober 2019.#Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG tegen Bureau voor intellectuele eigendom van de Europese Unie (EUIPO).#Hogere voorziening – Gemeenschapsmodel – Toelating van hogere voorzieningen – Artikel 170 ter van het Reglement voor de procesvoering van het Hof – Verzoek dat het belang van een vraag voor de eenheid, de samenhang of de ontwikkeling van het Unierecht niet aantoont – Niet-toelating van de hogere voorziening.#Zaak C-613/19 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 October 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0498_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 24 October 2019.#ZPC Flis sp.j. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark Happy Moreno choco — Earlier national figurative marks MORENO — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Substitution of the list of goods covered by the earlier national figurative marks — Rectification of the decision of the Board of Appeal — Article 102(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Legal basis — Previous decision-making practice — Legal certainty — Legitimate expectations.#Case T-498/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 October 2019

PreviousPage 5 of 6Next