Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.
Records
Question· Mündliche Frage18/6996open
Germany · German Bundestag · 11 December 2015
Original text of the question(s):<br />
<br />
What conclusion does the federal government draw from the fact that freezing the employer's share of contributions to statutory health insurance obviously leads to an ever-increasing burden on employees? And is the federal government considering setting an upper limit for additional contributions in this legislative period or even in 2016? Introduce an increase in the employer contribution, which is currently frozen at 7.3 percent?
Question· Schriftliche Frage18/6403open
Germany · German Bundestag · 16 October 2015
Original text of the question(s):<br />
<br />
Is the Federal Government prepared to review the classification of Serbia as a safe country of origin in view of the fact that the European Court of Human Rights stated in its judgment of July 7, 2015 (ref.: 60125/11, V. M. et al. vs. Belgium) that it had received reports about the lack of access to healthcare, housing or education, as well as discrimination and mistreatment of people Are there Roma backgrounds that confirm the protection requests of families with small children?
Question· Schriftliche Frage18/6301open
Germany · German Bundestag · 9 October 2015
Original text of the question(s):<br />
<br />
Can the Federal Government rule out that the obligation to take “objective” measures in the respective “Domestic Regulation” chapters of the planned trade agreements TTIP, TiSA and CETA may conflict with the requirements for the basic tariff in private health insurance, according to which the basic tariff corresponds in type, scope and amount to the benefits of statutory health insurance must correspond (Section 12 Paragraph 1a Sentence 1 of the Insurance Supervision Act (VAG) and the amount to be paid by the policyholder for the basic tariff must not exceed the maximum amount in statutory health insurance (Section 12 Paragraph 1c Sentence 1 VAG) (please explain)?
Question· Schriftliche Frage18/6301open
Germany · German Bundestag · 9 October 2015
Original text of the question(s):<br />
<br />
According to the Federal Government's estimate, how many EU immigrants, especially from Romania and Bulgaria, live in Germany, and how high could the number of those from this group be who are denied inclusion in statutory health insurance due to previous insurance periods that are difficult to determine?
Question· Mündliche Frage18/5341open
Germany · German Bundestag · 26 June 2015
Original text of the question(s):<br />
<br />
For what reasons does the federal government now want to stick to publishing the nursing grades until the evaluation system for nursing facilities has been revised, even though the nursing grades themselves are not meaningful in the opinion of the health insurance medical service and "very good" overall grades are awarded across the board, even if important core areas of the Care are at best 'sufficient'" (Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung from June 22, 2015 "Care TÜV is being reformed")?<br />
<br />
Until the rating system for care facilities is revised, how does the federal government want to ensure that those in need of care and their relatives can get a meaningful picture of individual care facilities and not just a good overall grade about deficits in the care facilities? Care to be deceived?
Question· Schriftliche Frage18/5040open
Germany · German Bundestag · 29 May 2015
Original text of the question(s):<br />
<br />
What measures is the Federal Government taking to adapt the standard system of statutory health insurance (GKV) to the needs of refugees in need of protection and to ensure the care of traumatized refugees who have fallen under the responsibility of the GKV-financed health care system since the period of receipt was shortened to 15 months under the Asylum Seekers' Benefits Act and at the same time Costs for psychotherapy in the specialized psychosocial centers for refugees are not covered by health insurance companies (see Mainz report from May 12, 2015)?
Question· Schriftliche Frage18/4908open
Germany · German Bundestag · 15 May 2015
Original text of the question(s):<br />
<br />
To the knowledge of the Federal Government, how many decisions has the Federal Social Court made between 2009 and today, and how many of them related to statutory health insurance?
Report· Bericht, Gutachten, Programm18/4283open
Germany · German Bundestag · 11 March 2015
Bericht zu der durch das Büro für Technikfolgen-Abschätzung beim Deutschen Bundestag durchgeführten Untersuchung: Medizinisch-technischen Fortschritt (MTF) im Gesundheitswesen, Institutionen sowie Arzneimittel und Medizinprodukte im Innovationsprozess, Entwicklung der Gesundheitsausgaben, MTF und Gesundheitskosten sowie Beitrag zum Gesundheitszustand, Gesundheitswirtschaft als Wachstums- und Beschäftigungschance, Fallstudien, Schlussfolgerungen und Handlungsoptionen
Question· Schriftliche Frage18/4140open
Germany · German Bundestag · 27 February 2015
Originaltext der Frage(n):<br /> <br /> Inwiefern ist nach Ansicht der Bundesregierung das Mindestlohngesetz bei der Entlohnung von Haushaltshilfen nach §§ 24h und 38 SGB V und § 10 des Zweiten Gesetzes über die Krankenversicherung der Landwirte (KVLG 1989) durch gesetzliche Krankenkassen anzuwenden, und welchen Handlungsbedarf sieht sie?
Report· Bericht, Gutachten, Programm18/4256open
Germany · German Bundestag · 24 February 2015
Bestandsaufnahme und Problemaufbereitung, Todesverständnis, Todeskriterien, Feststellung des Todes, Todesverständnis und -kriterium im Kontext der Organtransplantation, Information, Aufklärung und Beratung, Schlussfolgerungen und Empfehlungen
Question· Schriftliche Frage18/4044open
Germany · German Bundestag · 20 February 2015
Original text of the question(s):<br />
<br />
Does the Federal Government share the assessment that in order for health insurance to cover the costs of the morning-after pill as a non-prescription finished medicinal product, a legal regulation (e.g. application of Section 129 Paragraph 5a SGB V) is necessary in any case in order to ensure a uniform pharmacy retail price for emergency contraceptives that are dispensed at the expense of the statutory health insurance, to ensure this, and is the federal government planning to do the same?
Question· Schriftliche Frage18/4001open
Germany · German Bundestag · 13 February 2015
Original text of the question(s):<br />
<br />
As part of the planned introduction of a criminal offense for corruption in the healthcare system, which I also support, the Federal Government considers a clarification in Book Five of the Social Security Code to be necessary, which enables a practical demarcation between punishable behavior and cooperation between service providers that is desired in terms of health policy, and if not, from which Reasons not?