Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Amendment · HAMDT

HAMDT 685 (101st)

An amendment comprised of several amendments en bloc to require USDA to conduct an evaluation, including onsite reviews and surveys, of how the conservation compliance provisions in current law are being implemented; to allow USDA to levy monetary penalties for violations of the conservation compliance and "sodbuster" provisions in current law--rather than cutting off all farm program benefits, as is now required. The amount of the penalty would depend on the severity of the violation, and benefits would still be cut off for certain repeat violations. ("Sodbuster" bars farming of highly erodible lands unless approved conservation measures have been implemented). The amendment also directs USDA to provide additional information to producers regarding the "flexible base" planting provisions in the bill; and, authorizes USDA to take certain steps to increase Conservation Reserve Program enrollment in environmentally sensitive areas such as the Great Lakes and the Chesapeake Bay area.

passedUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

—

Last action

—

Status

On agreeing to the de la Garza amendments (A044) Agreed to by voice vote.

Sponsors

Rep. de la Garza, E. [D-TX-15]

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

8 July 2021

Records

Official amendment HAMDT 685 (101st) from United States at United States Congress. Status: On agreeing to the de la Garza amendments (A044) Agreed to by voice vote..

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

No documents linked.

Leesvertaling

Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

Sponsors

Related records

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.