Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Amendment · HAMDT

HAMDT 876 (110th)

An amendment numbered 1 printed in House Report 110-416 to clarify that `valid existing rights' associated with existing mining claims would be protected under the Act. It would clarify that in addition to paying a 4% royalty, existing operations will still need to come into compliance with the Act within 10 years; would clarify that the claim maintenance and location fees currently allotted to administration of the mining laws will continue to be so allotted with the balance going to clean-up of abandoned hardrock mines, subject to appropriations; would clarify that user fees assessed by the BLM to process mining permit applications will be used for administration of the mining law program; would limit the purview of section 504-citizen suits--to permits issued pursuant to title III of the Act; and finally, would clarify that nothing under the Act will affect the sovereign immunity of any Indian Tribe.

passedUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

—

Last action

—

Status

On agreeing to the Rahall amendment (A001) as modified Agreed to by voice vote. (text as modified: CR H12421)

Sponsors

Rep. Rahall, Nick J., II [D-WV-3]

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

3 February 2022

Records

Official amendment HAMDT 876 (110th) from United States at United States Congress. Status: On agreeing to the Rahall amendment (A001) as modified Agreed to by voice vote. (text as modified: CR H12421).

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

No documents linked.

Leesvertaling

Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

Sponsors

Related records

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.