Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Amendment · HAMDT

HAMDT 950 (104th)

An amendment, printed as amendment No. 2 in House Report 104-480, to modify a study of ammunition capable of penetrating police body armor. The amendment would also eliminate provisions of the bill which, 1. Require the disclosure of certain records to the FBI; 2. allow the admissibility of wiretapping evidence obtained in "good faith"; 3. establishes streamlined procedures for removal of alien terrorist; 4. authorizes the Executive Branch to officially identify organizations as being "Terrorist Organizations". The amendment would also delete the so-called "should have known" standard and the "reasonable cause to believe" standard for determining criminal culpability for providing material support to a terrorist or terrorist organization, excludes black or smokeless powder from the list of explosives to be reviewed by the Explosive Materials Taggants Study, and deletes provisions allowing the FBI to obtain telephone billing records of individuals.

passedUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

—

Last action

—

Status

On agreeing to the Barr amendment (A002) Agreed to by recorded vote: 246 - 171 (Roll no. 61).

Sponsors

Rep. Barr, Bob [R-GA-7]

Subjects

Police

Source updated

15 August 2021

Police

Records

Official amendment HAMDT 950 (104th) from United States at United States Congress. Status: On agreeing to the Barr amendment (A002) Agreed to by recorded vote: 246 - 171 (Roll no. 61)..

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

No documents linked.

Leesvertaling

Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

Sponsors

Related records

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.