Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Bill · HJRES

H.J.Res. 114 (96th)

A joint resolution proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to limit the number of consecutive Congresses in which Senators and Representatives may serve.

referredUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

18 January 1979

Last action

18 January 1979 · Introduced

Status

Referred to House Committee on the Judiciary.

Sponsors

Rep. Lagomarsino, Robert J. [R-CA-19], Rep. Pritchard, Joel [R-WA-1], Rep. Hollenbeck, Harold C. [R-NJ-9], Rep. Burgener, Clair W. [R-CA-43], Rep. Murphy, Austin J. [D-PA-20], Rep. Dannemeyer, William E. [R-CA-39], Rep. Luken, Thomas A. [D-OH-1], Rep. Walker, Robert S. [R-PA-16], Rep. Goodling, William F. [R-PA-19], Rep. Stark, Fortney Pete [D-CA-13], Rep. Cleveland, James C. [R-NH-2], Rep. Winn, Larry, Jr. [R-KS-3], Rep. Edwards, Mickey [R-OK-5], Rep. Bedell, Berkley W. [D-IA-6]

Subjects

Rule of law

Source updated

14 June 2021

Rule of law

Summary

Constitutional Amendment - Declares that no person shall be a Senator or Member of the House of Representatives during more than six consecutive Congresses.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 18 January 1979

    Introduced

    Referred to House Committee on the Judiciary.

    Source: IntroReferral

  2. 18 January 1979

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  3. 18 January 1979

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Leesvertaling

Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.