Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Bill · HJRES

H.J.Res. 88 (109th)

Marriage Protection Amendment

passedUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

6 June 2006

Last action

18 July 2006 · Passed

Status

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

Sponsors

Rep. Musgrave, Marilyn N. [R-CO-4], Rep. McIntyre, Mike [D-NC-7], Rep. Aderholt, Robert B. [R-AL-4], Rep. Akin, W. Todd [R-MO-2], Rep. Alexander, Rodney [R-LA-5], Rep. Bachus, Spencer [R-AL-6], Rep. Bartlett, Roscoe G. [R-MD-6], Rep. Barrett, J. Gresham [R-SC-3], Rep. Barton, Joe [R-TX-6], Rep. Beauprez, Bob [R-CO-7], Rep. Bishop, Sanford D. [D-GA-2], Sen. Blackburn, Marsha [R-TN], Sen. Boozman, John [R-AR], Rep. Brady, Kevin [R-TX-8], Rep. Brown, Henry E., Jr. [R-SC-1], Rep. Burton, Dan [R-IN-5], Rep. Cannon, Chris [R-UT-3], Rep. Cantor, Eric [R-VA-7], Rep. Carter, John R. [R-TX-31], Rep. Chabot, Steve [R-OH-1], Rep. Chocola, Chris [R-IN-2], Rep. Cole, Tom [R-OK-4], Rep. Conaway, K. Michael [R-TX-11], Rep. Cubin, Barbara [R-WY-At Large], Rep. Culberson, John Abney [R-TX-7], Rep. Davis, Lincoln [D-TN-4], Rep. Davis, Jo Ann [R-VA-1], Rep. Davis, Geoff [R-KY-4], Rep. Deal, Nathan [R-GA-9], Rep. Doolittle, John T. [R-CA-4], Rep. Drake, Thelma D. [R-VA-2], Rep. Duncan, John J., Jr. [R-TN-2], Rep. Emerson, Jo Ann [R-MO-8], Rep. Everett, Terry [R-AL-2], Rep. Feeney, Tom [R-FL-24], Rep. Forbes, J. Randy [R-VA-4], Rep. Foxx, Virginia [R-NC-5], Rep. Franks, Trent [R-AZ-8], Rep. Garrett, Scott [R-NJ-5], Rep. Gingrey, Phil [R-GA-11], Rep. Goode, Virgil H., Jr. [R-VA-5], Rep. Goodlatte, Bob [R-VA-6], Rep. Gutknecht, Gil [R-MN-1], Rep. Hall, Ralph M. [R-TX-4], Rep. Harris, Katherine [R-FL-13], Rep. Hayes, Robin [R-NC-8], Rep. Hayworth, J. D. [R-AZ-5], Rep. Herger, Wally [R-CA-2]

Subjects

Rule of law

Source updated

15 August 2025

Rule of law

Summary

Constitutional Amendment - Marriage Protection Amendment - Declares that: (1) marriage in the United States shall consist only of the union of a man and a woman; and (2) neither the U.S. Constitution nor the constitution of any state shall be construed to require that marriage or the legal incidents of marriage be conferred upon any other union.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 6 June 2006

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  2. 6 June 2006

    Introduced

    Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

    Source: IntroReferral

  3. 6 June 2006

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  4. 17 July 2006

    Reported

    Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 918 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.J. Res. 88 with 1 hour and 30 minutes of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit. During consideration of H.J. Res. 88 pursuant to this resolution, notwithstanding the operation of the previous question, the Chair may postpone further consideration of the joint resolution to a time designated by the Speaker.

    Source: Floor

  5. 18 July 2006

    Passed

    Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

    Source: Floor

  6. 18 July 2006

    Vote

    On passage Failed by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 236 - 187, 1 Present (Roll no. 378). (text: CR H5297)

    Source: Floor

  7. 18 July 2006

    Vote

    Failed of passage/not agreed to in House: On passage Failed by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 236 - 187, 1 Present (Roll no. 378).(text: CR H5297)

    Source: Floor

  8. 18 July 2006

    Floor

    The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule. (consideration: CR H5320)

    Source: Floor

  9. 18 July 2006

    Floor

    Rule provides for consideration of H.J. Res. 88 with 1 hour and 30 minutes of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit. During consideration of H.J. Res. 88 pursuant to this resolution, notwithstanding the operation of the previous question, the Chair may postpone further consideration of the joint resolution to a time designated by the Speaker.

    Source: Floor

  10. 18 July 2006

    Floor

    Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 918. (consideration: CR H5297-5321)

    Source: Floor

  11. 18 July 2006

    Passed

    Rule H. Res. 918 passed House.

    Source: Floor

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

Documents

3 official files

Introduced in House (text)

View fileDownload file

This file cannot be previewed here. Use View or Download.

Leesvertaling

Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Introduced in House (text)

    Introduced in House · EN · 6 June 2006

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Introduced in House (PDF)

    Introduced in House · EN · 6 June 2006

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Introduced in House

    summary · EN · 6 June 2006

    Open at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

Sponsors

Showing 48 of 136 sponsors and actors.

Related records

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.